Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1

I hope Chrysler and SCOTUS can set this right. When it comes to the using of TARP funds it seems like a gigantic money-laundering scam, really. The government BOUGHT these companies and the right to oversee them with the stimulus money, it was all sleight of hand, IMHO... I hate to see what this will do to Chrysler itself...

If the Congress passes an Unconstitutional Law, and the President signs it, and then SCOTUS rules against the TARP funds altogether, does the US get their money back (meaning the tax payers), or are they going to say it’s all gone?

What about all the other companies who received funds. Would they then owe them back to the government? [I’d love to see ACORN slapped with a bill of a few million dollars that they received.] I’m guessing TARP receiving companies are going to be spending the money as quick as they can now, eh? Seems like that would be a typical reaction...

At least SCOTUS recognizes the importance of overseeing what the Executive Branch is doing in the private affairs of these countries. Can’t see how it is Constitutional for the President to appoint a board of directors, or hire and fire within a company.

Could we possibly be seeing our system work though??? Checks and Balances? Is someone on SCOTUS waking up to the nightmare they are forcing on us, and against the Constitution? I sure hope so...


100 posted on 06/08/2009 1:53:55 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyRocks
Is someone on SCOTUS waking up to the nightmare they are forcing on us, and against the Constitution? I sure hope so...

I hope so, too. I wouldn't have thought that Ginsburg would have been the one to do it. But maybe Bambi is getting a tad too arrogant. Dictators frequently overreach.

107 posted on 06/08/2009 2:03:00 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks
If the Congress passes an Unconstitutional Law, and the President signs it, and then SCOTUS rules against the TARP funds altogether, does the US get their money back (meaning the tax payers), or are they going to say it’s all gone?

Treasury has already admitted they cannot account for $9 TRILLION. We've been suckered thanks to the idiots who voted this baffoon into office. Hopefully this is the first of many interruptions into the current administration's dictatorial takeover of this nation through willful violation of Constitutional rights and the rule of law. Me thinks 0 screwed up with the statement that this was out of SCOTUS' control. I pray SCOTUS will provide the checks and balances that Congress is willfully disregarding.
226 posted on 06/08/2009 5:28:09 PM PDT by callisto (It's the three T's: Too Many Taxes, Trillions in Debt, and Transparency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks; livius
Could we possibly be seeing our system work though??? Checks and Balances? Is someone on SCOTUS waking up to the nightmare they are forcing on us, and against the Constitution? I sure hope so...

Not a snowballs chance in hell.

In a Dictatorship, the law is whatever the Dictator says it is.

Ginsburg is merely playing a game to give the appearance that that the SCOTUS is looking at this objectively.

No way she gives it to the full court.

She is a democrat.

234 posted on 06/08/2009 6:10:59 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson