How many murders are prevented when a scum murderer is executed or murdered by a fellow criminal? In each case--the scum criminal executed, the abortionist murdered--that murdering individual will murder no more, and that is all that may be reasonably drawn from such a thing.
It is non-related to ask if such a death prevents other killings done by other people not involved in the death of the object individual of the 'sequitur'.
700 people at his funeral...
Most of them had never met him...
He was “ushering” at his church...
How sweet...
But how many of the 700 attended a funeral for the thousands of innocent babies that he murdered ???
And how many of the 700 would even condemn the life that he led “outside of the church” ???
There’s something horribly guoulish about the reporting on this death and burial/funeral...
>> That, my FRiend is a non sequitur!
The issue is the effective value of relying on arbitrary unlawful killing of abortionists to solve the abortion issue. The is the simple perspective that’s being debated. My comment is relevant.
You're analogy is nonsense. Abortion is a business of supply and demand. The abortionist performs a service for a clientele that demands it. Your jailhouse murderer provides no such service nor does he act in the interest of a client. The notion that you can dismiss, as irrelevant, the claim that the market will still fulfill the demands of the public based upon your argument here is truly bizarre.
>> It is non-related to ask if such a death prevents other killings done by other people not involved in the death of the object individual of the ‘sequitur’.
The children I’m referring to would have been those on Tiller’s schedule following his death. The abortions may still take place, however, at a different facility.
Some speculate that the children scheduled for death have luckily evaded Tiller’s craft. Well, they won’t die in his hands, but they may die by the hand of another.
My comment is relevant: “How many unborn children have been saved because of this event? Perhaps none.”
If you still think it’s twisted logic, please FRiend, expand your reasoning as to why.