[csense]

How many murders are prevented when a scum murderer is executed or murdered by a fellow criminal? In each case--the scum criminal executed, the abortionist murdered--that murdering individual will murder no more, and that is all that may be reasonably drawn from such a thing.

You're analogy is nonsense. Abortion is a business of supply and demand. The abortionist performs a service for a clientele that demands it. Your jailhouse murderer provides no such service nor does he act in the interest of a client. The notion that you can dismiss, as irrelevant, the claim that the market will still fulfill the demands of the public based upon your argument here is truly bizarre.

[MHGinTN]

You are more irrational than Gene Eric! I suspect you come on these abortion discussion threads to be just that, irrational, pushing the extremes to destory reasoned discussion. Well, you've succeeded!

Let me 'splain' it for you one more time:

A non-sequitur is when the poster speciously tries to equate the death of an individual performing abortions as an impediment to behavior done by someone else performing abortions. It is about as rational as claiming the execution of a murderer will be an impediment to someone somewhere else performing murders.

The only definite result that can be verified with Tiller's murder is that Tiller will never perform another abortion. To try and fabricate a correlation to other abortionists positively or negatively is a non-sequitur.