Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: Sotomayor says she chose word poorly
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/29/09 | Ben Feller - ap

Posted on 05/29/2009 1:03:13 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – The White House says Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor acknowledges she made a poor word choice in a 2001 speech in which she said that a Latina judge would often reach a better conclusion than a white male judge who hasn't lived the same life.

That's according to presidential spokesman Robert Gibbs. He says he has not talked directly to Sotomayor about it but has spoken to people who have.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chose; poorly; racist; soniasotomayor; sotomayor; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last
DUhhh... Uhhh,, DUhhh.. (/Gibbs)
1 posted on 05/29/2009 1:03:13 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Me thinkest thou protest too much....


2 posted on 05/29/2009 1:04:18 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Which word, Judge?


3 posted on 05/29/2009 1:04:34 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (doubleplusungood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
White House: Sotomayor says she chose word poorly

Yeah, she messed up. She told the truth about her racist viewpoints.

4 posted on 05/29/2009 1:04:39 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Man, if I could make a dryer spin like that I would be rich...


5 posted on 05/29/2009 1:04:41 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Sotomayor says she chose word poorly

of course she did, wink wink

6 posted on 05/29/2009 1:05:04 PM PDT by rockabyebaby (We are soooooooooooooooooooooooo screwed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So which word was poorly chosen? Does she mean she should have said “Hispanic” rather than “Latina”? Or “suburban” rather than “white”? Or “worse” rather than “better”?


7 posted on 05/29/2009 1:05:17 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Exactly. She’s not refuting what she said, just the way she said it. Liberals-it’s not wrong unless you get caught. And not even then, if you can escape the consequences. Even better, if you can perform the magic trick of demonising your opposition for calling you out on it.


8 posted on 05/29/2009 1:05:36 PM PDT by mrsmel (Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

That’s alright mama. Your pres__ent, Barck the Kenyan also chose his nominee for the Supreme Court poorly. Right on par for this administration.


9 posted on 05/29/2009 1:05:44 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (You can't build a "wind farm" without "Big Oil's" petroleum products.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Now that sure sounds like a person qualified to choose words that will affect the whole nation on the Court...


10 posted on 05/29/2009 1:05:46 PM PDT by LRS (Just contracts; just laws; just a constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

puhleeeeezzzzeeeeeeeee.......She said what she said because that is what she believes.


11 posted on 05/29/2009 1:06:12 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Gibblets trying to whitewash the radical


12 posted on 05/29/2009 1:06:24 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This racist woman has no business on the USSC, period.


13 posted on 05/29/2009 1:06:33 PM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The supremes CANNOT choose words poorly. Words have meanings, especially at their level!


14 posted on 05/29/2009 1:06:57 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Was waiting for this.

Liberals are allowed to “explain” and “put things in context”.

Meanwhile, a Republican gets fried for the use of the nonsense word “macaca” which is tortured to give it a racial connotation that was never remotely intended.


15 posted on 05/29/2009 1:06:59 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What word, “White”?

No babe, you made a poor concept choice.


16 posted on 05/29/2009 1:07:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Sticks and stones will break my bones but WORDS will ALWAYS hurt me” is the liberal mantra. So the goose gets it too.


17 posted on 05/29/2009 1:07:22 PM PDT by spald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Interesting that the White House seems to be going on the defensive.

Time to press the battle harder.


18 posted on 05/29/2009 1:07:34 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Chose a word poorly, eh? Sorta like Turbo Tax Timmy “forgot” to pay his taxes, right?


19 posted on 05/29/2009 1:07:36 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

No freaking crap. That whole sentence and the intent behind it is garbage. It’s an insult to all my ancestors who busted their butts day in and day out to rise up from poverty and provide a life for themselves.


20 posted on 05/29/2009 1:07:38 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. 2010 awaits.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson