Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Was Right To Torture Terror Suspects - It Saved Lives, Claims Unrepentant George Bush
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | May 29th 2009

Posted on 05/29/2009 10:14:59 AM PDT by Steelfish

I was right to torture terror suspects - it saved lives, claims unrepentant George Bush

By DAVID GARDNER 29th May 2009

George Bush has defended his decision to allow the use of torture on terror suspects in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks.

The former president broke his silence on the scandal to insist that controversial interrogation methods like waterboarding and sleep deprivation helped save lives.

Mr Bush was echoing claims made by his former Vice President Dick Cheney that the harsh interrogation techniques vilified by the Obama administration gained valuable intelligence.

The ex-president was careful to avoid words like ‘torture’ and ‘abuse’ in his first public comments on the lighting rod issue.

Unlike Mr Cheney, he also shied away from directly criticising President Obama, who has banned the CIA from using the techniques.

Speaking in Benton, Michigan, Mr Bush talked about the ‘fog of war’ following the terror attacks on New York and Washington in 2001.

‘It was a rollercoaster of emotions, it really was.

'I vowed to take whatever steps that were necessary to protect you,’ he said to a largely sympathetic crowd of about 2,500 people in his first formal post-presidential address on Thursday night.

He said some did not understand the seriousness of the threats faced by the US after 9/11 and claimed his overriding duty was to do whatever was required to protect the public.

‘The first thing you ask is, what’s legal? What do the lawyers say is possible? I made the decision, within the law, to get information so I can say to myself, I’ve done what it takes to do my duty to protect the American people,' he said.

‘You have to make tough decisions. They’ve captured a guy who murdered 3,000 citizens and that affected me.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; US: Michigan; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; cheney; cia; ciainterrogation; ciainterrogationmemo; georgewbush; michigan; presbush; presidentbush; waterboarding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
The headline is of course highly editorialized since it equates water-boarding with torture. Why do newspaper editors allow for such biased and explosive headlines? How low does journalism get?
1 posted on 05/29/2009 10:14:59 AM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Editors are the ones who write the headline.


2 posted on 05/29/2009 10:15:51 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I Was Right To Torture Terror Suspects

Is that a direct quote?

3 posted on 05/29/2009 10:17:20 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Peter2:16; 2Jedismom; 2Trievers; 4mycountry; A_perfect_lady; Alberta's Child; Allegra; AllieOop; ..

~~God bless Pres. George W. Bush for his steadfastness in protecting us!


4 posted on 05/29/2009 10:18:01 AM PDT by STARWISE (They (LIBS-STILL) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war- Richard Miniter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Why do newspaper editors allow for such biased and explosive headlines?

The sole purpose of the headline is to get your attention, in the hopes that you will end up buying the paper.

5 posted on 05/29/2009 10:18:23 AM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Bush is evil, Cheney is evil - blah, blah, blah...

No bias here.

6 posted on 05/29/2009 10:18:40 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“How low does journalism get?”

Further... no quotations. When was this statement made?

Ah Yes, the wonderful British Press.


7 posted on 05/29/2009 10:18:46 AM PDT by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I Was Right To Torture Terror Suspects - It Saved Lives, ................................ Oh Yeah, are they sure it wasn’t Winston Churchill who first said that?


8 posted on 05/29/2009 10:19:13 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

I miss having a President with a set!


9 posted on 05/29/2009 10:19:29 AM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
NO. The ex-president was careful to avoid words like ‘torture’ and ‘abuse’ in his first public comments on the lighting rod issue.
10 posted on 05/29/2009 10:20:19 AM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Their overriding hatred of Pres. Bush and Repubs taints everything they do.


11 posted on 05/29/2009 10:20:19 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Is that a direct quote?"

Of course not, they just put their own spin on his words:

The ex-president was careful to avoid words like ‘torture’ and ‘abuse’ in his first public comments on the lighting rod issue.

12 posted on 05/29/2009 10:21:24 AM PDT by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
"The ex-president was careful to avoid words like ‘torture’ and ‘abuse’ in his first public comments on the lighting rod issue. "

So the editor admits he's putting words in Bush's mouth in the headlines. This editor should be waterboarded until he promises to uphold some decent editorial standards.

13 posted on 05/29/2009 10:21:24 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The author is really no better than the headline author:

"George Bush has defended his decision to allow the use of torture on terror suspects in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks... The ex-president was careful to avoid words like ‘torture’ and ‘abuse’ in his first public comments..."

14 posted on 05/29/2009 10:22:26 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The Daily Mail was hugely anti-war and hates GW Bush.


15 posted on 05/29/2009 10:22:37 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
I was right to torture terror suspects

Where's the video of this. Seems like it would be all over the 24hr news shows.

16 posted on 05/29/2009 10:24:59 AM PDT by McGruff (My experience as a white man makes me better than a latina woman. That's ok right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Why do newspaper editors allow for such biased and explosive headlines?

Simply - to sell more newspapers.

If it bleeds, it leads.

17 posted on 05/29/2009 10:25:00 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Again, let's get right to the point of this:

Bush: Saving American lives is more important that the temporary discomfort and fright of terrorists.

BO: The continued comfort and well being of terrorists is more important than saving American lives.

18 posted on 05/29/2009 10:27:46 AM PDT by La Lydia (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

UNREPENTENT

So I guess that would have applied to Truman for bombing Japan - twice

So I guess that would apply to Eisenhower

So I guess that would apply to Schwartzkopf


19 posted on 05/29/2009 10:29:12 AM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan; Borges

This is NOT a case where an editor simply jazzed up a headline. The article itself uses “torture” throughout as if there is no question at all, that water-boarding fits the definition.

This is a propaganda piece, period.


20 posted on 05/29/2009 10:29:48 AM PDT by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson