Posted on 05/26/2009 9:48:50 AM PDT by DesertRenegade
“Does it take a published scientific paper to prove that those who practice homosexual behavior can change? “
Several high profile homosexual men fathered children before “realizing they were gay.” Sorry, but if a woman can ever arouse you to the point of going through sex, etc, I’d say you’re not “inherently” gay as they like to claim they are.
Propaganda works. Although we know that ultimately truth will prevail, sometimes it takes a long while.
Who cares? If someone wants to be gay then that’s their business. Just don’t ask me to pay for it or expect me to afford anyone special considerations for it.
“The 65 or so TV characters, who portray friendly, sympathetic, clean-cut, and sanitized homosexuals, work hard to persuade us that accepting homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle is necessary to our well-being as a civil society”
Nice. Straight to the point.
This sums up the entire socialist agenda.
Yes, actually. Any moron can scrawl stuff in the Kalamazoo Fishwrapper, precisely because they don't do peer review.
The DSM paraphilia list grows shorter all the time.
They’ve been attempting to declassify pedophilia for some time.
Peter Singer is all about legalizing sex with animals.
Sodom, meet Gomorrah.
Let the fire fall.
I am always impressed when I see what 2% of the population has been able to accomplish. They are a huge political force that consumes huge amounts of the public thought bandwidth. It is truly amazing.
Why don’t any TV shows feature “the funny, lovable necrophiliac next door”?
Correct. That leads to the conclusion that’s its all about their genitals (OCD).
I’m sure that’s next!
Step One would be to say that since homosexuality is in the mainstream, we WILL allow it to be taught about in schools IF (a very big "if") it is taught about as a chosen lifestyle by some.
Step Two would be to slowly introduce to any "teachings" of homosexuality, the problems of such a lifestyle (HIV, AIDS, and other communicable diseases, etc.). Make sure there eventually is enough information to dissuade people from wanting to enter into such a lifestyle.
Name people and their stories who lived that life, saw the idiocy of it and gave it up. Spin the lifestyle as not something good (won't be hard!), but remember to stick to the truth and use it to fight back at the eventual backlash the homos will mount as they will try to bury the truth of their chosen "liefstyle".
Whether you are born homosexual or become homosexual it manifests itself in behavior and all behavior can be changed.
I have a family member who is homosexual. They have said it is the most superficial and egotistical life style ever (their words) in the history of the world.
I asked are you happy. No, but they will never let me leave.
We’re currently averaging 9 years from utterly impossible crazy laugh-your-butt-off joke to law.
Recent example: pedos included in hate crime law.
No they don't. But try get the facts out there for all to see, especially to those in political office, which unfortunately are homosexuals doing all they can to suppress truth and make it illegal to distribute the truth to the general public. You risk being charged by human rights commissions of "hate crimes" simply for raising the question of whether or not homosexual behavior is a learned/chosen behavior and not one someone is "born" with.
For every year that goes by in which the truth of homosexualy is suppressed, is another year that these Homosexual anarchists succeed in warping the minds of, and converting children entering and in the public school system.
There needs to be a much stronger voice that can't be shut down by the homo anarchists and MSM that promotes it.
I’ve related this beofre at FR. Decades ago I worked for College Textbook publishers. We sold an abnormal psych textbook which, when I started with the compnay had homosexuality listed as abberant behavior. Within a year of my employment, a new edition came out which no longer listed homosexuality as abberant behavior, but still isolated the behavior as ‘destructive’. A couple of years later, another edition came out which listed homosexuality as an alternate lifestyle of risky behavior. By the time I left the company, the current edition didn’t even list homosexuality except in an off-hand way as an alternate lifetsyle in normal society.
I doubt it.
Normal sane people would find it morally repugnant and very offensive...much as they should all those “funny homos”.
Have you ever seen a gay porn mag?
Unless you have the stomach strength of a buzzard, I don’t recommend it.
The word “vile” doesn’t even come close....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.