Posted on 05/25/2009 10:02:19 AM PDT by ikez78
PING
It’ll never be published by the NYT.
Innerestin’
gonna need more details....before this is sufficiently ignored by the msm
Great information, but the source author needs to find a good editor, lots of typos and grammar problems!
Great information, but the source author needs to find a good editor, lots of typos and grammar problems!
Bookmarked
Thanks for the ping Ikez78.
#
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/harmony/pdf/CTCForeignFighter.19.Dec07.pdf
COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER AT WEST POINT - Harmony Project
“AL-QA’IDA’S FOREIGN FIGHTERS IN IRAQ
A First Look at the Sinjar Records”
by Joseph Felter and Brian Fishman
(December 19, 2007)
Saddam Hussein: Formally jihadi #1 and the tutti capo tutti of arab terrorism.
thank you
BTW -
Here is a good link for the Sinjar Records in English (606 names)
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/harmony/FF-Bios-Trans.pdf
Expect the authors to suddenly find their positions eliminated or downgraded to GS-3.
I have been reading that the combat captured insurgents have been mostly foreign fighters. This report is specific to the Al Qaeda (Al Qaida) originated ISI organization. In this report it states that the vast majority of the fighters today have nothing to do with Al Qaeda but the report doesnt state were those groups originated from.
Who are the other groups and are they mostly home grown combatants or mostly foreign fighters?
A study by The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point of al Qaeda documents deemed the "Sinjar Records" indicates that al Qaeda was, in fact, able to operate inside the country during the rule of the former regime. The center also has previously posted internal al Qaeda documents in which al Qaeda members revealed to one another that "some of them went to Saddam" likely in referrence to al Qaeda members fleeing Afghanistan to Iraq.
"Let's be clear on this -- there wasn't any al-Qaeda in Iraq until the Bush administration invaded that country. If you want a second opinion about this, ask me again in a couple of weeks."
please point them out. i am the author and did it very late. sorry.
editing now...
Should say, “-— hotly contested ISSUE that —”
It looks like you caught the other ones.
That, or I was being too critical! ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.