Posted on 05/18/2009 5:20:59 PM PDT by JohnD9207
A Texas mother of twins got the shock of her life when doctors revealed that her 11-month-old boys do not have the same father.
Mia Washington decided to get some expert advice when she and her partner noticed that twins Justin and Jordan had different facial features.
Paternity tests then revealed what had happened — two eggs had been fertilized by two different sperm and there was a 99.99% chance the twins had different dads.
Doctors at the DNA lab in Dallas, Texas had never seen such a result.
Washington later admitted she had had an affair and got pregnant by two different men at the same time.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
*“Out of all people in America and of all people in the world, it had to happen to me, she told myfoxdfw.com. “I’m very shocked.”*
Obviously she’s a big fan of Maury Povich.
Ahem! How the h--- do you think the bitches get pregnant?
I think it was right. Dogs do that all the time.
ROTFL!
Oh, those wacky Democrats! Yes they can.
I just had a gut feeling mom was black. Thank you Lord for good intuition.
Now THAT is what we used to call a gang bang.
Let your mind run with that for awhile."
The term "sloppy seconds" comes to mind.
Isn't that what parents of fraternal twins often notice? Why is this cause for alarm?
The first throught that came to mind: EWWWW!!!!!!
I HATE it when that happens... :)
How about DNA tests for all newborn babies? That would insure the husband or boy friend wouldn’t be required to pay for another man’s child. The real father does the screwing and I see no problem with him being screwed or the mommy dearest having her dirty drawers shown in public.
Love the alliteration! LMAO!
I was only commenting on Mama’s lack of viable brain cells...not making any type of statement.
But since you mentioned it...I do not agree with DNA testing on all infants. It is nothing more than requring a woman to prove she had not been unfaithful.
I do think that when a woman sues for support for a child born out of wedlock, the burden of proving paternity is on her.
Right you are!
No, it is protection for a man who might be required to raise or pay for another man’s child. Can you tell me one reason a decent woman wouldn’t want the test?
I am a “decent woman.” Three sons, one husband. I have never even thought of being unfaithful. But I’ll be damned if I would ever allow DNA testing just to prove my husband was the father of my children.
If my husband requested a DNA test when my kids were born, he wouldn’t be my husband much longer.
I wish you could live the hell a lot of men have lived because of their “decent women’s” affairs. I have never been unfaithful to a wife. That didn’t stop my first wife having a long term affair. I imagine she would have gotten her bloomers in an uproar also if I had requested a DNA test. ;0)
I did notice the “my kids” part. How about your husband’s kids? My ex wife always referred to our kids as hers.
They are my kids. They are my husbands kids as well. Sometimes a pronoun is just a pronoun.
I am not trying to pick a fight with you are convince you to change your mind. Nor am I minimalizing the hell you have been through.
We are of two different opinions on this. I’m sorry your wife cheated on you, but that does not make us all guilty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.