Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The main difference in 2009 is that an unfounded fear of depleting global resources has been replaced with an exaggerated fear of global warming.

Keep hope alive! Bailey's coming back!

1 posted on 05/15/2009 5:40:32 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

The mother’s milk....freebies from DC.


2 posted on 05/15/2009 5:48:18 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Alternative energy needs to stand on it’s own period.

The nuke technology is interesting.


3 posted on 05/15/2009 5:54:39 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy. 2010 awaits.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

In the upper midwest, a grid-tied photo-voltaic system cost about $8-12 per watt installed. For an average home at northern latitudes with good solar exposure, a 6 or 7 kilowatt system (w/4 solar hrs./day) might do the trick. That’d be a bill anywhere from $48,000 to 84,000 for the set-up. Government grants and credits are supposed to cut this in half, so the homeowner would be paying an average of $33,000 for the system. With cap and trade and an additional electrical cost of $1,000-$1,500 per household, realizing energy costs approaches some believable threshold if one plans on staying in one place for 20 years or so.

Of course, liberty and utility independence are the biggest reasons I can think of for owning a PV system. Cutting costs ain’t even on the list.


4 posted on 05/15/2009 6:03:12 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Palin/Bachman 2012: Conservative Viagra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Actually, If they really wanted it they wouldn’t doo it via sponsoring... they would do it by awarding a cash-prize (tax-free) to the entity that accomplished the goal they wanted.

IE, Say that Government wanted 20% of our energy provided by solar; so they offer $50bn to the entity that put 20% solar energy into the grid. (With some specs, of course.) Then award the money to whomever does it. In a situation like one company providing %11, and one providing 14%... they might be able to file for it jointly, as their combined input is 25% of the grid, which exceeds the 20% mark they wanted.

Just my idea there.


5 posted on 05/15/2009 6:30:17 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mojave
helping the United States achieve “energy independence.”

"Protectionists!"

6 posted on 05/15/2009 6:36:28 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Not true, the subsidize for ethanol took place well after carter and it's billions per year.
9 posted on 05/15/2009 8:46:12 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
The Torture Debate Shows Our Vulnerability to Radical Evil

Napolitano Pulls Right-Wing Extremism Report

Sen. Graham is Sponsoring a Bill That Will Result in a National Anti-gun Database

More Americans "Pro-Life" Than "Pro-Choice" for First Time And the GOP should move to the center?

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

11 posted on 05/15/2009 10:30:09 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; SunkenCiv; Ernest_at_the_Beach; george76; BOBTHENAILER
I suppose I'm just a skeptic in all this....but the alternatives to 'fossil' fuels is .....what?

Wind power; requires a backup generating system when the winds are too low charge a grid, or too high, in which case the windmills are shut down to save the structures. Fossil fuels are the backup....(Thank you T.Boone!)

Nuclear! I'd invest in nuke power in a NY minute....except there's no locality that wants a nuke power plant built near it, thanks to Hollywood and shysters.

Solar! That's the ticket! Acres and acres of solar panels in the pristine praries and deserts of the West...'Where the buffalo roam and the deer and the antelope play'! Of course there will be a backup fossil fuel generation plant when the seldomly heard of cloudy day occurs. Damn....a discouraging word....right T.Boone?

Lignified plant material! During the Global Warming hoax, millions upon millions of trees have been planted to offset the CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning SUVs, jet aircraft and Toyota Prius (the statistical numbers game applies here, one SUV is replaced by three Prius rounding out the equation).

Just think of the wonderful transformation of energy technology if we can shake down fossil fuel energy providers to fund the plantings of more and more trees which can be used as a primary source of energy (and exercise) to warm our homes in the winter (Thank you, Ben Franklin!) and warm them in the summer as well.

Think of the traditions saved as well. The Yule log will be resurrected from oblivion, the Christmas Tree will provide a symbol of faith and joy.... and warmth a week later. We might even sneak a few lumps of coal from the brat's stocking for added heat. What the hell, it's Christmas....or winter solstice...or whatever.

Yessiree! We're embarked on a new journey into the discovery of new energy solutions which wouldn't have been possible had we not developed technologies to convert fossil fuels to energy in the first place. It's a new age!

(It's up to all of you to name this 'New Age')

Cough...cough...
12 posted on 05/16/2009 1:00:40 AM PDT by BIGLOOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Sure. Why use the petroleum God put in the ground for that purpose when we can burn the world’s food in our vehicles?


13 posted on 05/16/2009 4:00:39 AM PDT by RoadTest (For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus - I Tim 2:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“They don’t really care how much it costs.”

“They don’t really care how much it costs.”

“They don’t really care how much it costs.”

“They don’t really care how much it costs.”


(Wanna BET!?)

15 posted on 05/16/2009 4:55:27 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

As I sit here in my office in 2009, the relics of those 70’s heady days of youth are about me. The south wall all of glass has been remodeled to include Low E insulating but is still floor to ceiling glass to permit the winter sunlight to strike the brown quarry tile floor. It is a very effective passive solar collector and has provided some warmth for virtually no cost for 34 winters. The eve overhang is just the correct dimension to prevent the warmth to collect in the summer and add to the A/C load.

The active so;ar collectors are long gone. Like the gas plant in the article they never worked well enought to be worthwhile. The trees however have grown and completely shade the house during summer providing the cool shade that reduces the interior temps.

I have been there and done that, I read the Mother Earth News from cover to cover and implemented many of the suggestions. I sold my wood burner because my insurance company frowned on solid fuel heating systems. That was ok because my chainsaw was worn out and gathering the wood was becoming more trouble than it was worth to a 65+er. I also sold my ‘78 GMC longbed after 25+ years of faithful service and shudder at the thought of piling up a load of wood in my new Sprinter van that replaced the pickup.

Having been there the current talk is deja vu ll overagain except for one thing. I worked over a nearly 10 year period as a subcontractor on three TVA Nuclear plants. Coupled with a pumped storage plant, they are proving to be the most effective of all the energy of that bygone era.


16 posted on 05/16/2009 4:57:38 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The main difference in 2009 is that an unfounded fear of depleting global resources has been replaced with an exaggerated fear of global warming.

Soon to be followed by an over-the-top fear of water disappearing.

22 posted on 05/16/2009 5:07:38 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4HPIC_enUS310US310&q=Great+Plains+Coal+Gasification+Plant+in+Beulah%2c+North+Dakota

will get you hits with GLOWING praise for gasification!

(No mention of COST; though.)


23 posted on 05/16/2009 5:11:19 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The photo is of the successfully operating coal gassification plant at Eastman Chemical Co in Kingsport TN and has been operational since about 1980.

This plant production is converted into feed stock that allows Eastman to be the world low cost producer of many products. Although they are currently a little slow as are most chemical companies, the production of filter tow is booming and they have trouble keeping up. The Chinese are addicted to smoking and come to Kingsport to buy an unimaginable quantity of the filter material.The gas plant allows that to happen.

I noted in a post above my efforts. As a young Jaycee, my close friends and buddies were the engineers who designed, built and operated this facility. Those were truly hedy days. The young engineers of today are being asked to work on throughly plowed ground. Eastman buys the coal just north of here in south west Virginia where there is a never ending supply.

24 posted on 05/16/2009 5:11:39 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The Bum Rap on Biofuels
American Thinker | 5-13-08 | Herbert Meyer
Posted on 05/14/2008 3:59:06 AM PDT by Renfield
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2015711/posts

Campaign to vilify ethanol revealed
ethanol producer Magazine | May 16, 2008 | By Kris Bevill
Posted on 05/17/2008 9:22:13 AM PDT by Kevin J waldroup
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2017389/posts


27 posted on 05/16/2009 7:29:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson