Posted on 05/13/2009 3:00:04 PM PDT by pissant
The Maxim Hot 100--and it's No. 1 hottest female--were just announced, and joining the bootylicious ranks of Scarlett Johansson, Megan Fox and Jessica Biel is ... drumroll ... Olivia Wilde, who plays Dr. Remy Hadley on House.
Now. Wilde is drop-dead gorgeous, with stunning, almost feline features and one of those enviably lithe yoga-bods. She's definitely very attractive. But is she hot? There's a noted absence of those signature lad-mag curves that have characterized most of the other No. 1 hotties. Meaning either Maxim is being more expansive in its evals--she's intelligent (spent time at Andover and Georgetown Day) and a talented actress, in addition to being really, really hot. Or it's giving her extra hot-points for making out with Mischa Barton as her lesbian lover on The O.C. Not sure. What do you think?
The other gals who made the cut--including our first lady, at No. 93:
2. Megan Fox
3. Bar Refaeli
4. Malin Akerman
5. Mila Kunis
6. Eliza Dushku
7. Adriana Lima
8. Rihanna
9. Jordana Brewster
10. Jennifer Love Hewitt
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.newsweek.com ...
The Obama-googles must be equivalent to about a case of beer....
Helen Thomas must be on there too.
Even after two hours in the salon chair, Michele is barely attractive. There is no natural beauty there-—her “beauty” is all smoke, mirrors and special effects.
But hey, those are her good points! 0:)
93 out of 100 is not that great. I still don’t find her looks all that bad. I am surprised that FREEPERS respond to her looks so much when actually what we should discuss is her ugly insides. Who cares what she looks like. I mean we had some ugly First Ladies who were very nice. Barabra Bush was pretty dang ugly but at least had a wonderful heart and loved America. Michelle does not have a nice heart or loves America.
Maxim magazine has to give away subscriptions to keep up its circulation at a point high enough where it can sell ad space. I’ve had a subscription for the last three years and haven’t paid a cent.
You can add it to the endangered media list.
Never heard of any of them,,,,are they significant to society?
Hey, theres a good one, we can now refer to her as Old #93,
I’ve never even opened one before. Not that I have anything against scantily clad women, It just looks like a Cosmopolitan for metrosexuals.
Michelle's arms seems to be the “butt of jokes”. Hide those anacondas girl, nothing to brag about!
She’s 93 on the Worst Looking list, right? This headline must be a mistake.
She’s hot?? I guess if you’re attracted to gangly and awkward women with horse teeth.
Hey, give the old girl a break. Barbara Bush was pretty good looking when she was young.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcus_e/2975071997/
the “INSIDES” radiate OUTSIDE....I think that’s what freepers respond to....she’s got an ugly attitude and it shows.
Is there a semi-nude photo as is typical of Maxim “babes”?
I would think that the attractive women a man actually knows might be more important than a list of women most men will never ever meet. This is really just the media trying to imagine we need them.
Unfortunatly for Michelle Bela Abzub, Nancy Pelosi, and Helen Thomas came in 10 rankings ahead of her.
Where did Aunt Esther come in?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.