Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LaBruzzo's welfare drug testing plan dead in committee
Times Picayune ^ | May 12, 2009 | Bill Barrow

Posted on 05/13/2009 10:44:00 AM PDT by BBell

BATON ROUGE -- A proposal to require drug testing of adult applicants for cash public assistance programs died by a single vote today in a House committee.

The House Health and Welfare Committee's action leaves in place the state's present use of questionnaires to screen applicants for public assistance, with state employees ordering laboratory drug tests for applicants who demonstrate the possibility of testing positive. Applicants who test positive must undergo state-paid treatment plans to receive benefits.

Rep. John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, wanted to require drug testing of all applicants and leave in place the treatment requirements for anyone who tested positive. He originally aimed House Bill 137 at recipients of the state primary assistance program for families. He amended his bill, he said, to affect only adult applicants for cash assistance.

That was not enough to satisfy concerns of his colleagues who said the bill could be found unconstitutional because it requires tests without cause. Some lawmakers also cited concerns that the state health and social service offices that handle the existing program cannot reliably predict how much LaBruzzo's bill would cost.

When he first pitched the idea, LaBruzzo argued that he would save money, presumably from more applicants being denied benefits. He shied away from that argument during today's hearing, instead saying he wants to help more drug addicts get treatment.

As for constitutional concerns, LaBruzzo said he believes language saying the tests would be intended to "test applicants' job readiness" would satisfy the courts. He compared the resulting testing model to potential employers requiring drug tests of all job applicants.

The Department of Social Services, which administers federally financed public assistance programs, did not take a formal position on the bill publicly. But Assistant Secretary Alison Neustrom told lawmakers that the current drug

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: deugtesting; eugenics; johnlabruzzo; labruzzo; welfare
This is the same guy who last year wanted to pay welfare mama's and daddy's do get sterilized. He realizes what a drain these people can be.
1 posted on 05/13/2009 10:44:01 AM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BBell
This is the same guy who last year wanted to pay welfare mama's and daddy's do get sterilized. He realizes what a drain these people can be.

Amen to that. I'll be willing to guess that like with all other potential winning issues for the GOP, a few spineless members of the GOP voted against this.

2 posted on 05/13/2009 10:45:44 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Liberals are so heavily into evolution, but don’t hesitate to interfere with “survival of the fittest” and the culling of the herds.


3 posted on 05/13/2009 10:51:02 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (If global warming didn't exist, Al Gore would have had to invent it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

>>Liberals are so heavily into evolution,
Huh?
>>but don’t hesitate to interfere with “survival of the fittest” and the culling of the herds.

Seen Idiocracy? (I heartily recommend it)


4 posted on 05/13/2009 10:57:18 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Well then they’d better stop testing people in the workplace for drugs because this should be equal treatment for all!


5 posted on 05/13/2009 11:04:54 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

If they can’t get off drugs, how are you going to get them off the public dole. Maybe a drug test for public monies would be an incentive. Or maybe not.


6 posted on 05/13/2009 2:21:30 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson