[a fool in paradise]

It was all a cover anyway. The Sex Positive agenda doesn’t CARE about the cause, advocates only believe that there should be NO moral judgements over sexual pairings of ANY kind.

[C210N]

Some of these scientists should persue the existance of such a gene, and determine whether its presence can ultimately lead to the organisms cells chemically transforming into Salt.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

 

[ClearCase_guy]

As far as I can see it's either:

A) A chosen lifestyle
B) Genetic flaw
C) Mental illness

They tell me it's not a choice; now they tell me it's not a gene. So, we're back where we were 40 years ago -- homosexuals suffer from a mental illness and in many cases they can be cured. The biggest roadblock to curing these sick people is the current "sex positive" view of their malady.

[HerrBlucher]

What crap, there are lots of gay gene’s......Gene Robinson for example.

Now that we have gender selection through abortion the gay gene advocates are starting to think its not such a good idea to promote the gay gene idea.

[r9etb]

includes an admission that there is no "gay" gene

Sorry, Bob. That's not what the statement actually says.

But then, it's WND, so what do you expect?

[ChetNavVet]

“The activist researchers themselves have reluctantly reached that conclusion.”

Are these researchers government funded?

They, and all tax drainees, should all be fired and forced to pick lettuce as thier pennance.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

I’ve wonder how genetics would account for lisping and swishing.

[Leg Olam]

‘no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors.’

Beige....yes, It must be beige with lavender trim and those shoes just must go...

[PLD]

Like we didn’t know this..the smart people of this country know there is no gay gene..more likely these poor fools were raped by a person when they were young..Watch your children folks the Queers are on the run..

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

I wonder how genetics would account for lisping and swishing.

[Erik Latranyi]

If homosexuality was genetic, would liberals favor abortions for babies with such a genetic structure or would they scream “genocide”?

[laotzu]

There is no consensus among scientists..

Science can only be established by voter approved opinion.

Galileo was a fraud.

[EternalVigilance]

Committee for the Traditional Family BUMP.

[SonOfDarkSkies]

I thought he died several years ago...

[ontap]

Well that settles it. This guy will never win the Miss USA crown.

[HighlyOpinionated]

It’s a choice after all.

So how does this affect the “gay marriage” issue?

[Seruzawa]

Mental Health professionals once again admit they are idiots.

Seriously, I’ve never met a shrink who wasn’t crazy. How are they gonna help anybody?

[Wil H]

Byrd wrote. "The activist researchers themselves have reluctantly reached that conclusion. There is no gay gene. There is no simple biological pathway to homosexuality."

Dumb B@stard! I'm going to run into his office and tear his diploma right off the wall!

How dare he say that ! This guy has no right being a doctor, he must be dragged through the dirt in the media and hounded out of the medical profession immediately!!

I'm going to scream and scream 'til I'm sick!

So there!

[scripter]

I posted this a couple of days ago:

Simon LeVay is a scientist who also happens to be gay. Here is what he said in 1996:

People who think gays and lesbians are born that way are also more likely to support gay rights.

LeVay makes an interesting statement. Yet:

• no credible scientist will state gays are born with their same-sex attraction
• there isn't a single credible study supporting the born that way theory
• the ex-gay population is growing
• environment is a key factor in all studies on same-sex attraction

Since science doesn't support the born that way theory, why do so many people support gay rights? Why should homosexuals be given any rights based on sexual behavior alone?