Yeah, at one point, they realize how stupid they are to basically subsidizing 0bama all the time when they don't get much from him.
The paragraph is from imdb, and there's nothing more there.
1 posted on
05/09/2009 1:33:20 AM PDT by
paudio
To: paudio
I suppose he’s going to “bail” them out for this and then impose his will and force them to put his face 24-7, mafya knee breaker loan shark style.
2 posted on
05/09/2009 1:37:59 AM PDT by
JudgemAll
(control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
To: paudio
"Networks Likely To Turn Down Obama Primetime Request"
I wouldn't bet on it. They've sold their souls to Ø, and he's not about to give them back. He owns them.
5 posted on
05/09/2009 1:50:01 AM PDT by
ChicagahAl
(Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
To: paudio
Obama is on TV almost everyday now. He never has anyhting new to say, so I just change the channel or go do something else. I wonder if these White House PR guys ever heard of “over saturation”.
To: paudio
Bull crap. They are Hussein worshipers through and through. They’ll bow their knees before him and obey.
14 posted on
05/09/2009 3:27:55 AM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm SO glad I no longer belong to the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: paudio
OBAMA: BAD FOR PROFITS
16 posted on
05/09/2009 5:01:04 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: paudio
Networks take a big hit when they pre-empt their normal schedule like this. Not only are they losing the ad revenue as the article states, but they're losing one important thing that provides "brand/product differentiation" for them compared to other media outlets: their prime-time programs.
18 posted on
05/09/2009 6:23:40 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
To: paudio
He’s fired CEO’s and nationalized our auto industry. Think that he will let a few media bigwigs stand in his way?
19 posted on
05/09/2009 6:27:05 AM PDT by
listenhillary
(Rahm Emmanuel slip - A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.)
To: paudio
How long before this Democrat Congress and Democrat Administration get the bright idea to start appropriating public money to buy the same air time for these important and necessary "public" national leadership events on network TV?
After all, this is chump change to them and it's all a part of "serving the people" and keeping them properly informed, is it not?
22 posted on
05/09/2009 7:14:33 AM PDT by
Gritty
(The world has concluded Obama is nourished by applause for his perpetual candidacy-VD Hanson)
To: paudio
Dear networks. So you think you are tough enough to turn your master away? What part of THIS don't you pansies understand:
"Who the f*** do you think you're dealing with? We'll have the IRS audit your fund. Every one of your employees. Your investors. Then we will have the Securities and Exchange Commission rip through your books looking for anything and everything and nothing we find to destroy you with."
24 posted on
05/09/2009 8:29:10 AM PDT by
Enterprise
(The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
To: paudio
"We will continue to make our decisions on White House requests on a case-by-case basis, but the Fox decision gives us cover to reject a request if we feel that there is no urgent breaking news that is going to be discussed," one network exec told the trade publication." You people at the networks don't quite understand do you? First, it is never a request from Obama, it is a demand. Second, it doesn't matter if YOU lose money, it only matters that the messiah gets on prime time at a time of his convenience. So as the great Pamela Lee said - "Suck it."
25 posted on
05/09/2009 8:32:57 AM PDT by
Enterprise
(The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
To: paudio
Pretty brave of them. I’ve heard this administration has specialist in kneecaps and legs willing to apply their expertise.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson