Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: luv2ndamend
2 posted on
05/08/2009 9:37:09 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(Iron Maiden's gonna get ya, no matter how far!)
To: luv2ndamend
Our rights as Americans are being stripped away at a speed I never thought I’d see in my lifetime. If ever an American needed to be an armed citizen, it is now.
To: luv2ndamend
Division of Thought Crime. Or is it Pre-Crime? Or is it mere oppression of undesirables, much as old gun control laws came into being to disarm blacks?
4 posted on
05/08/2009 9:38:52 PM PDT by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: luv2ndamend
They don't want to find out just how dangerous patriotic American could be.
6 posted on
05/08/2009 9:39:30 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: luv2ndamend
Bills like this will turn “potential threats” into real ones ...
7 posted on
05/08/2009 9:39:43 PM PDT by
clamper1797
(FUBO ... protege of the unholy union of Karl Marx and affirmative action)
To: luv2ndamend
Republican Peter King is anti-gun? I did not know that.
To: luv2ndamend
could potentially deny firearms to pro-lifers, gun-rights advocates, tax protesters, animal rights activists, and ................. Freepers
10 posted on
05/08/2009 9:41:40 PM PDT by
umgud
(Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
To: luv2ndamend
Who needs liberals when RINOS do the job for them!!
To: luv2ndamend
"[Rep. King] would deny citizens their civil liberties based on no due process," objected Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America. "A 'known terrorist?' Look, if the guy has committed an act of terrorism, we shouldn't have to worry about him being able to buy a gun; he should be in jail!" And this is the same guy that gets smoochy-smoochy air-time on Hannity.....
Another Defender of Freedom /s
To: luv2ndamend
13 posted on
05/08/2009 9:48:17 PM PDT by
GOP Poet
To: luv2ndamend
These bastards are sinister. They just can’t leave it alone.
14 posted on
05/08/2009 9:55:12 PM PDT by
Finalapproach29er
(A woman will be the next President; I hope it's Palin instead of HRC.)
To: luv2ndamend
“Our rights as Americans are being stripped away at a speed I never thought I’d see in my lifetime.”
This is just the beginning.
0bama is a hard-core leftist.
You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
I hope all of the foolish Republicans who refuse to wake up and acknowledge that these are extreme leftists at the helm are taking note.
These are Communists.
Poo-poo all you want—you’ll be wishing you listened to people like me in a few years.
Best of luck to you in the new Amerika.
15 posted on
05/08/2009 9:55:43 PM PDT by
Boucheau
To: luv2ndamend
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." How is this possible? Unlike the 1st Amendment which places restrictions upon Congress and the Federal Government the 2nd Amendment prohibits EVERYONE from infringing the rights of the people.
To: luv2ndamend
17 posted on
05/08/2009 9:58:27 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
To: luv2ndamend
And, the nefarious deeds of a crafty terrorist need not involve guns at all. I’m sure they would be happy to produce a mushroom cloud rather than a hail of bullets.
18 posted on
05/08/2009 9:59:45 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
To: luv2ndamend
Left-wing extremists at D.U. (Democratic Underground) called for the "communistic-islamic" overthrow of U.S. in 2004 Posted on Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:50:33 PM ET by ETL:
"...Any weapons we resort to must be "real" weapons not pistols. i.e. Rifles and shotguns. Due to concerns of re-supply (you have to plan for a long battle) such weapons should be limited to very small number of different rounds."
"if it is decided to fight, be prepared to fight, bring a backpack, entrenching tool, tent, and other equipment of an Infantrymen. You will need it for Bush and his supporters decides it is better to fight than to accept the will of the people, the fight to overthrow them will be a long fight."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2228933/posts
20 posted on
05/08/2009 10:03:20 PM PDT by
ETL
(ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: luv2ndamend; All
Any of you ever think that these outlandish attempts are a good way to flush out targets for re-election?
This will get zero traction.....the Dims are afraid of the NRA and Repubs don't have the nads to support it.
21 posted on
05/08/2009 10:06:02 PM PDT by
Pistolshot
(The Soap-box, The Ballot-box, The Jury-box, And The Cartridge-Box ...we are past 2 of them.)
To: luv2ndamend
Typical World Net Daily, a flashy headline which the details of the story do not back up.
Anybody can introduce a bill. The question is will it go anywhere, or is it going to die a slow death in the committee?
Given how toxic gun control legislation has been for the Democrats in the past, and the fact that this would face several constitutional challenges, I would not worry too much until and unless a committee vote were scheduled. However, I doubt it will get that far. The only reason the Democrats have a majority in the House is because of the pro-Gun “Blue Dog” Democrats. They would not be so stupid as to risk their seats by provoking the NRA on legislation like this.
22 posted on
05/08/2009 10:07:45 PM PDT by
GreenLanternCorps
("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter".)
To: luv2ndamend
If the gov’t is going to make me a criminal, I'm going to at least make it worthwhile.
24 posted on
05/08/2009 10:10:09 PM PDT by
Nachoman
(Think of life as an adventure you don't survive.)
To: luv2ndamend
28 posted on
05/08/2009 10:24:30 PM PDT by
SIDENET
("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson