Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Women challenge Marks & Spencer bra pricing policy
AP/Yahoo ^

Posted on 05/07/2009 12:53:37 PM PDT by greatdefender

ONDON – Busty women have banded together to battle Britain's largest clothing retailer over a surcharge for extra-large brassieres. Frustrated with failed attempts to convince Marks & Spencer to drop a 2 pound ($3) extra charge for sizes DD and larger, the women plan to take their fight to the company's annual meeting.

"They aren't listening to customers, maybe they'll listen to shareholders," said Beckie Williams, a founder of Busts 4 Justice who has purchased a share of M&S stock so she can attend the meeting. "People think it would be great to have big boobs, but it's an emotional issue, it can make you feel isolated, and shopping at Marks & Spencer can make you feel like a freak when they charge you extra."

The group, which has grown to several thousand members via Facebook, seems to have tapped into a reserve of resentment.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bra; courtchallenge; uk; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
I hate to see the evidence for this case
1 posted on 05/07/2009 12:53:37 PM PDT by greatdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

2 posted on 05/07/2009 12:55:21 PM PDT by SmithL (The Golden State demands all of your gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

>> People think it would be great to have big boobs

America must have... how else do you explain Obama & Biden?


3 posted on 05/07/2009 12:55:35 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Um...don’t larger sizes require more material...more underwire...etc.?

Doesn’t seem like a conspiracy...just economics.


4 posted on 05/07/2009 12:56:22 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

By their reasoning, a Chevy Tahoe should cost no more than a Cobalt.


5 posted on 05/07/2009 12:57:53 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

I wear XL shirts, not because I need them, I just like the loose fit. But, I pay an extra $2 for the XL size; simply stated .... it takes more material to make an XL than it does a Medium or a Large shirt.

Would a DD bra be any different?


6 posted on 05/07/2009 12:58:10 PM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

TTIUWP


7 posted on 05/07/2009 12:58:19 PM PDT by AH_LiveRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
IF the market for DD and up is so large (sorry .. /8^) .. ) that is IS economic sense.

Does Britain actually HAVE a large (again ... ) DD and up market?

8 posted on 05/07/2009 12:58:42 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

Not only that, but it makes sense in that statistically there are fewer women who wear them, so they don’t need to manufacture as many. However, they still need to operate all the machinery and labor. So they have to make up the money elsewhere.

Plus if they can charge a premium, they will.


9 posted on 05/07/2009 12:59:21 PM PDT by Unlikely Hero ("Time is a wonderful teacher; unfortunately, it kills all its pupils." --Berlioz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

America has an XL and up market to justify the increased cost


10 posted on 05/07/2009 1:00:10 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

All this company has to do is say that they are actually giving a discount on the smaller size bras. Then sit back and watch the fur fly.


11 posted on 05/07/2009 1:00:16 PM PDT by boocoowell (Mares eat oats, does eat oats, and little lambs eat ivy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

I’ll pay the difference, for certain considerations.


12 posted on 05/07/2009 1:00:27 PM PDT by CaptRon (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Price them by the pound.


13 posted on 05/07/2009 1:04:20 PM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

How cheap are thongs there?


14 posted on 05/07/2009 1:04:23 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division

In the UK they do!


15 posted on 05/07/2009 1:04:44 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Boycott Bras!


16 posted on 05/07/2009 1:05:15 PM PDT by SmithL (The Golden State demands all of your gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

What a no-brainer! Of course they can charge extra for larger clothing..it takes extra material, which increases the production cost. Sheesh! Should I make a fuss cos DH is a TALL guy, and we have to pay extra for that size? Once I figured out his mom wouldn’t give me a stipend for his tallness, I got over it! (It’s her fault, she’s the tall one)


17 posted on 05/07/2009 1:06:36 PM PDT by blu (Last one out of Michigan, please turn off the lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight
TTIUWP

Like 'em big, do you?


18 posted on 05/07/2009 1:07:22 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Bigger cars cost more...
Bigger TVs cost more...
Bigger houses cost more...

So what we have here is that the smaller busted women who require less material should subsidize the excess material required of the busty.
Ah, the joys of socialism!


19 posted on 05/07/2009 1:08:05 PM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Boycott Bras!

We tried that in the 70's. Wonder if it really made a difference? (GUYS, SHUT UP!)

20 posted on 05/07/2009 1:08:21 PM PDT by blu (Last one out of Michigan, please turn off the lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson