Posted on 05/07/2009 9:47:12 AM PDT by presidio9
A second racy lingerie photo has emerged of Miss USA runner-up Carrie Prejean - as well as some details about her past that may shed some light on the beauty queen's well-publicized views against gay marriage.
The new image of Prejean appeared Wednesday on the site TheDirty.com, flying in the face of Prejean's assurances to pageant reps that the earlier photo was the only one.
The site has been down due to heavy traffic, but CNN reports the second image, like the first, shows Prejean in pink panties and no top, facing away from the camera.
Pageant officials met Tuesday after the first photo appeared to consider stripping Prejean of her Miss California USA title for keeping the photos a secret. Failure to disclose semi-nude photos is grounds for disqualification from the contest.
While the photos released so far appear no more revealing than the swimsuit Prejean wore on stage, Nik Richie, publisher of TheDirty.com, has indicated there are more to come.
Prejean's publicist says Prejean posed for the photos when she was 17 in order to land a modeling job. Prejean herself defended the first image, saying, "I am a Christian, and I am a model ... Models pose for pictures, including lingerie and swimwear photos."
Prejean, whose anti-gay marriage comments during the Miss USA pageant thrust her into the national spotlight, may also have some explaining to do about a series of court documents from her parents' messy, decade-long divorce proceedings.
The papers, dug up by TMZ.com, show that Prejean's parents flung a series of homosexual allegations against one another.
In one of the documents, Prejean's father describes a confrontation he had with her mother in 1996, in which "Ms. Prejean accused me, in front of our daughter, of homosexuality."
Another excerpt quotes a court-appointed doctor who said "The mother questioned [within hearing of the girls] whether [her father] was a homosexual or had a homosexual roommate."
Court papers dated May 16, 2000, include the following statement from a court-appointed counselor: "The mother also alleges the father told the girls their stepfather was gay, that all men with mustaches are gay."
Prejean's father "acknowledges talking with the girls about the stepfather's brother being gay, not the stepfather," said the papers.
Prejean has said she believes her gay marriage views cost her the crown. She has since signed on to star in a controversial National Organization for Marriage campaign supporting "opposite marriage."
"Marriage is good," Prejean said at a news conference announcing the ad campaign. "There is something special about unions of husband and wife. Unless we bring men and women together, children will not have mothers and fathers."
Whoa, they are really out to destroy her. And Sarah. And Sarah’s daughter.
Such vicious misogyny.
Right. Next you're telling me this guy was gay. Poofters don't rock that hard.
Bonus Trivia: Freddie Mercury was one of the last of the Zoroastrians, who are dying out because the are from Iran, and they can only marry within their religion.
Court papers dated May 16, 2000, include the following statement from a court-appointed counselor: “The mother also alleges the father told the girls their stepfather was gay, that all men with mustaches are gay.”
***
OK so Carrie would have been what, 12 years old at the time this was noted in court? And she’s being called on the carpet for something her father supposidly said which came out in divorce court nearly 10 years ago while she was still in elementary school?
This has gone beyond stupid.
So now they are digging into divorce records and publishing them.
These are the same people who think its wrong to wire-tap a terrorist, but they’ll trash your privacy anytime they want to.
Here’s something interesting and of course not reported as part of this story. She is saying nothing different than what obama has said several times during the campaign - he thinks and has spoken the words, “that marriage is between a man and a woman”. Where is the press, or should I say the fag, outrage on his words.
They are just going to keep beating her up until she feels it’s not worth it any longer.
Typical left thuggery and method of personal destruction.
Yep I have 4 teen neices and nephews and that is probably the most common put down they use on a constant basis. IMHO no matter what the gays want, they are never going to convince this generation that what they do is normal!
Pathetic attack. There is nothing inappropriate about the pictures I’ve seen. This is like the attacks on Governor Palin, but somehow more trivial.
“Plus her answer at the pagent wasnt anti-gay anyway. She basically said that marriage was between a man and a woman for her, but that we live in a great country where people get to choose.”
I quite agree with your point, as you stated it, but what’s clear is that, for the screamers, this is another exercise in word “re-definition” or “word bifurcation” as I sometimes call it. The gays aren’t satisifed with being allowed to marry; in most cases, they can indeed achieve the functional equivalent. No, it is the very definition of the term “marriage” they insist on. YOU, YOU must change your ways/way of thinking. YOU are the one under attack for your bigoted, homophobic views. Maybe you have moderated your instinctive or reflexive views of homosexuals BUT IT AIN’T ENOUGH. Despite the work you’ve done on yourself, YOU are the intolerant one.
just like:
old: Out-of-control spending
new: Investment
Movie roles, playing fags, that’s all!
I can't see the picture (blocked by firewall) but it's Freddie Mercury, right?
I didn't realize you were joking.
First I find out Dom Deluise ISN'T gay.
Then, I find out David Ogden Stiers IS gay,
Then, I hear Freddie Mercury isn't gay?
What's next? My Pringles less than perfectly stacked?
Going back even further "scuzzy!"
In divorce proceedings from 2000 - 3 days after Miss Prejean turned 13 - they quote court appointed doctors and the father regarding conversations that took place between the mother and father, and between the father and the girls. Nowhere is Carrie Prejean quoted - nowhere.
The discussed confrontation between her parents (within earshot of the girls) took place in 1996 - when Carrie was 9.
And yet, Miss Tracy Miller, the intrepid reporter, somehow feels this information warrants the headline:
Court docs: Miss California USA Carrie Prejean used homosexuality as an insult
And further this information is supposed to support the comment in the article that:
Prejean, (snip), may also have some explaining to do about a series of court documents from her parents' messy, decade-long divorce proceedings.
Really Miss Miller?
Do 9 year old children have to answer for what their parents say during a contested and messy divorce?
I am not an advocate of suing everyone for everything, but I hope that Miss Prejean at least demands a retraction of the headline backed by litigation as necessary. This kind of fabricated headline is tabloid journalism at its worst: such an outrageous unsupported claim is not protected by 'reporting' on someone who has status as a public figure.
“The mother ‘ALLEGES’”. An allegation in a divorce document become a direct quote attributed to a third party for a headline.
Isn’t the constituency of the democrap/commiecrat party a sight to see! Such non-judgmental people, such tolerant degenerates they are! [’spittoie’ ... disgusting degenerates celebarte their degeneracy then accuse endlessly when someone not as degenerate as they is sliding toward their state of degeneracy; I suppose the slide isn’t fast enough to suit the dead-souled human sludge such as Perez and his enablers in government and media]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.