[luv2ndamend]

But it already is being condemned as unconstitutional, unrealistic and probably ineffectual.

Then, why are they trying?

[HiTech RedNeck]

This won’t go anywhere.

[KansasCanadian]

Is it a hate crime? Well, I hated it!

[MarkL]

That would certainly cut down on the volume of posts for both the KOSSAKS and DUmpsters...

But how many people really believe that this would ever be enforced against leftist bloggers... 70 year old pro-life grandmothers would wind up in jail though...

Mark

[holden]

But it already is being condemned as ... probably ineffectual.

O, I'm konfident zey haff veyce uf meykink it ass effekchual ass hoomanly possibell.

HF

[concerned about politics]

"up to two years in prison for those whose electronic speech is meant to 'coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress.'"

The Huffington post is toast. (/s)

Won't this outlaw MoveOn and ACORN activist alerts? All we have to do is sign up for their e-mails, and be "emotionally distressed " by the unexpected hate mail they send us, right?

[2harddrive]

Doubtless the Mighty Media Monolith would be EXEMPT from this “law”.

[softengine]

Another instance of our government creating laws that address symptoms of problem, not the problem.

How do so many stupid f***tards manage to get elected? And if calling our elected officials stupid f***tards is bad, that so many get elected says something even worse about us.

[dsc]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNMVMNmrqJE

[chuck_the_tv_out]

"rights, among which are life, liberty..."

free communication is an implicit right.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Gee, this comes a shock. I never thought the tolerant ones would do something like this.

[Nateman]