Skip to comments.
Sessions says he’d consider gay Supreme Court nominee
The Hill ^
| May 6, 2009
| J. Taylor Rushing
Posted on 05/06/2009 4:36:16 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
In my opinion, Sessions is totally wrong. An avowed homosexual judge by definition has their values system screwed up. Would we allow an out-and-proud alcoholic judge or an out-and-proud druggie judge (remember, for most of our history, homosexual sodomy was a crime). I think it shows a major lapse in judgement.
To: DesertRenegade
2
posted on
05/06/2009 4:37:57 PM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Smile you're on Janet's Candid Camera!)
To: DesertRenegade
Damned disappointed in Sessions. You either fight these socialist bastards or give up your seat to someone who will.
To: DesertRenegade
How about a trans gender horse fly.
4
posted on
05/06/2009 4:38:58 PM PDT
by
boomop1
To: DesertRenegade
The more I hear, the more I think our country is lost.
5
posted on
05/06/2009 4:39:04 PM PDT
by
edge10
(Obama lied, babies died!)
To: DesertRenegade
Has he lost his ever lovin mind?
6
posted on
05/06/2009 4:39:23 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: Jim Robinson
I would have to agree with that Jim.
7
posted on
05/06/2009 4:40:14 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Pres__ent Obama's own grandmother says he was born in Kenya. She was there.)
To: DesertRenegade
Now Announcing..........JUSTICE PEREZ HILTON!!!!
To: DesertRenegade
It doesn’t really matter, Souter is probably gay anyway.
9
posted on
05/06/2009 4:40:34 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(0bama - America's Elegabalus)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
10
posted on
05/06/2009 4:40:46 PM PDT
by
rdl6989
To: edge10
Oh, no. Just as you think this pile of !@(*# we’re in couldn’t get any worse...
11
posted on
05/06/2009 4:40:59 PM PDT
by
Pravious
To: DesertRenegade
Sen. Jeff Sessions (Ala.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Wednesday he could consider a gay nominee for the nations highest court.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (Ala.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee is a complete moronic idiot and needs to go then. Him and all 535 members of the House and Senate.
Can’t we just file a massive class action against the Federal Government for violation of the Constitution.
12
posted on
05/06/2009 4:41:36 PM PDT
by
maddog55
(Socialism is communism with fewer re-education camps.)
To: DesertRenegade
Hey, while we’re at it...why choose someone with a law degree? Why not a hairdresser?
The lib side doesn’t seem to know the law anyway.
Actually, gay doesn’t bother me. It’s the lib part that scares me.
To: freekitty
Nope. He’s thrown it in Zero’s face.
He’s goading the Clown in the White House. By putting it out there, it is now in the public’s eye. And the homosexual community.
Zero will have to make a choice now, and he’s going to anger a lot of people either way.
14
posted on
05/06/2009 4:42:45 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
(Those embryos are little humans in progress. Using them for profit is slavery.)
To: DesertRenegade
No, I think he’s making his point. It’s not a question of whether the judge is gay, but whether he is a gay ACTIVIST.
These days, the two are nearly interchangeable—but not quite. There are still a few people who you wouldn’t even know are gay, because they don’t consider it a matter to publicize and force on everyone else.
15
posted on
05/06/2009 4:43:26 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Perdogg
It doesnt really matter, Souter is probably gay anyway. It's not possible that a straight guy could get beaten up going for a "late night jog" in a public men's room known for sodomistic activity?
16
posted on
05/06/2009 4:47:39 PM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: DesertRenegade
The new litmus test for judicial temperament is what you do behind closed doors. America is going down the _hitter.
17
posted on
05/06/2009 4:49:41 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: DesertRenegade
You’re right, to allow a discussion of such an appointment shows a huge shift in judgment. To argue with the insane is to grant them a measure of sanity that they don’t possess. And at the very least the homosexual orientation is disordered. That’s so obvious that it is appalling to hear such nonsense considered.
18
posted on
05/06/2009 4:50:00 PM PDT
by
RichardMoore
(Baldwin2008.com)
To: DesertRenegade
Welcome Justice Barney Frank
19
posted on
05/06/2009 4:52:27 PM PDT
by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State business, Red State heart.........Palin 2012, can't come soon enough.)
To: rdl6989
Yep :)
And I'm living in an alternative universe.
20
posted on
05/06/2009 4:52:28 PM PDT
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Smile you're on Janet's Candid Camera!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson