Skip to comments.
Gravity: A Theory in Crisis (no joke!)
CEH ^
| May 5, 2009
Posted on 05/06/2009 10:28:23 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Gravity: A Theory in Crisis
May 5, 2009 Note: This is **not** a joke. How could gravity be a theory in crisis? Isnt gravity one of the best-understood facts of nature? Dont we all avoid jumping off cliffs because of the law of gravity? Gravity is doing just fine, thank you. Its our theory of gravity, and the cosmology built on it, that is in crisis according to a report on PhysOrg today: Study plunges standard Theory of Cosmology into Crisis....
(Excerpt) Read more at creationsafaris.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: abagofmagicdust; abracadabra; artbell; cosmology; cosmotology; creation; electricuniverse; evolution; goodgodimnutz; intelligentdesign; marsskull; science; scientism; stupidondisplay; voodoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: PapaBear3625
Maybe you can explain what it is about physics that necessitates an old earth?
To: MHGinTN
I rarely say it, but I have what appears (to me at least) to be a coherent theory of gravity. SImply put, mass is it's own dimensional phenomenon and remains at all TIMES constant. Spacetime warp is simply a function of mass and absolute velocity (implying, of course that a set of absolute zero conditions, including velocity, exists). As a mass moves through this time wrp, it's apparent 4th dimensional energy state is altered in such a way as to keep its 5th dimensional "q" constant.
The theory has a lot of fascinating corollaries, and even suggests a method for building anti-gravity engines. Interested parties, see my tagline.
22
posted on
05/06/2009 10:54:19 AM PDT
by
lafroste
(gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
To: CharlesWayneCT
Radioactive decay and the resulting extra heat produced by accelerated decay.
23
posted on
05/06/2009 10:55:27 AM PDT
by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
To: La Lydia
Have you met my brother? Yeah, he's heavy.
He'd be heavy on the Moon.
24
posted on
05/06/2009 10:55:36 AM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weight-lifting sessions each week and...)
To: GodGunsGuts
Naturalism, a Religion in Crisis!
25
posted on
05/06/2009 10:55:53 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: PapaBear3625
No no no! You see, the whole point behind the regular posting of this gibberish by GGG is to try and convince people that if any possible flaw in any theory that does not support creation has been found, any reworking of said theory is pointless and useless as the flaw implies that creationism is the only alternative and creationism MUST be the correct answer.
26
posted on
05/06/2009 10:55:54 AM PDT
by
Pox
To: MHGinTN
[[If the warping of spacetime is what gravity is, why have we left the temporal accumulation out of the reasoning?]]
Because evolution hasn’t equipted us to deal rationally with such warped discussions
27
posted on
05/06/2009 10:55:55 AM PDT
by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: La Lydia
I’m sorry to admit I actually got that reference. Maybe it’s because I’m getting older and parts of my body are falling.
28
posted on
05/06/2009 10:57:11 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
To: CottShop
"Because evolution hasnt equipted us to deal rationally with such warped discussions" But-but, that's twisted reasoning.
Sorry, had to.
Metaphors run amok do this to me. :o)
29
posted on
05/06/2009 10:58:28 AM PDT
by
Landru
(Arghh, Liberals are trapped in my colon like spackle or paste.)
To: andy58-in-nh
It’s funny what sticks in my mind.
30
posted on
05/06/2009 10:58:39 AM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: andy58-in-nh
[[Quantum mechanics is definitely not for lightweights. Some of the theoretical implications are so paradoxical that trying to wrap your mind around them is like trying to nail water to a wall - with a hammer made of light and a faucet that wasnt turned on until tomorrow.]]
Yep but hte great thing is that if you mistekenly come up with a wrong answer, you can just sleep Backwards that evening, and wake up the day before, and start all over again
31
posted on
05/06/2009 10:58:53 AM PDT
by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: andy58-in-nh
The mass of my upper and lower eyelids increased significantly while I was reading this article, causing them to irresistably attract each other.
To: mosaicwolf
"
I'll let you all know if I keep flying when I pull the power back to idle." And I'll hold my breath until we receive your report...
33
posted on
05/06/2009 10:59:06 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Some hope remaining.
34
posted on
05/06/2009 11:00:51 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
To: Some hope remaining.
[[The mass of my upper and lower eyelids increased significantly while I was reading this article, causing them to irresistably attract each other.]]
His one eye was in love with his other- they kept starign at each other
35
posted on
05/06/2009 11:01:30 AM PDT
by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: PapaBear3625
"
Any changes to theory will still have physics and astronomy being incompatible with the notion that the universe was created 6,000 years ago" Relax! There's no incompatibility; it fits like glove when you leave out the fairy tales of naturalistic religion.
36
posted on
05/06/2009 11:01:40 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: GodGunsGuts
To: CharlesWayneCT
Maybe you can explain what it is about physics that necessitates an old earth? Oh, little things like geology, fossils arranged in neat layers where you never find modern mammals or humans mixed with dinosaurs, stuff like that.
As far as astronomy is concerned, the idea that things are billions of light years away implying that the universe is older than 6,000 years is a start.
38
posted on
05/06/2009 11:02:12 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
To: MHGinTN
temporal quanta How do we know that "temporal quanta" exist?
To: CottShop
I disagree, but that’s grist for another mill.
40
posted on
05/06/2009 11:04:23 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson