[Pelham]

So do I . She will only lose credibility joining that pack of losers.

[Nextrush]

She loses by joining this group of losers.

[jla]

She'll lose not an iota of credibility. If she can effect real change it is to our (conservatives) advantage.
If this group is hosting town hall mtgs across the country who better to be the spokesman, or spokeslady, representing core conservative tenets?
Far too many people at FR forget, or never realized why Reagan was so successful. Do you think he won two historic Presidential landslide victories with only the votes of conservatives? Of course not, yet he did while remaining true to his (conservative) ideals.
Sarah Palin needs our support not our critiquing her over any perceived lapse of good judgment..

[reasonisfaith]

If you think about it, you might agree that a given individual’s integrity cannot be corrupted merely by association with a group (except in extreme examples and this is not an extreme example).

At this point, Palin’s integrity can only be corrupted if she were to compromise her principles in a significant way.

[Man50D]

She will only lose credibility joining that pack of losers.

She loses credibility so long as she remains in the increasingly socialist OP(formerly the GOP).

[sauropod]

I agree. Bad move on her part.

[Tennessee Nana]

Hope she prayed about this...

[gargoyle]

...It’s acurate. Another shill...

...What I fail to understand is the relativism that’s appearing more frequently on FR from most, not all, yea, I’ve read alot of the posts...