--For Some Freedom is just another word for telling someone else what to do.
--For Some Freedom is just another word for telling someone else what to do.
Tragedy.
This is sick!
I don’t understand why they won’t let the Grandparents have these children..
Diabetic? Isn’t that being descriminated againast?
The mom is a ‘recovering’ heroin addict?
Nowadays I thought you just about had to be a cannibal to not get your kids.
Read it and weep. It’s a peek at America in Year 3 of the Bommmie the Commie Administration. All “rights” for fags, no rights for straights.
Lord, God, may all the blathering uncivilized, unthoughtful, blindly complicit bureaucrats involved in this case find your suitable consequences for their complicity to be burning coals in their lap.
In Jesus’ Name.
A five year old knows the difference. Good grief, let him be adopted by his grandparents.
Sick bastards!
Ah ha. That’s the argument I’ve always had when Bill O’Reilly has said, “I would rather see two loving gay men adopt a child than two abusive heterosexuals!” Really? That’s the choice? We can’t find any good heterosexual parents, even though gays are 2% of the population and only a small percentage of them even want to adopt?
This is exactly what’s in store for America with gay marriage on the horizon. Children being taken away from loving grandparents, aunts and uncles, and handed over as fresh meat for perverts.
If his angina is stable (if it wasn’t he would probably have had bypass already) and her diabetes is in control then there overhealth is only slightly worse then that of an average person.
This sounds very strange. This is the kind of crap that leads people to strap a bomb around themselves.
Most 46-year-old diabetics whose disease is under control are not too ill to take care of two children. One assumes that the mother, once rehabilitated, could resume custody. Since when are the wishes (and potential happiness) of the child to be disregarded?
and now maybe this kid will be raised to be gay.
What a travesty. Parents should have the right to have a say in where their children end up. The kids should have a say as well. Those kids are going to hate those men and the government.
Those grandparents, who are not that old, had better watch it. If they get ill, they’re going to be classified as useless eaters. Angina and diabetes at their ages are not enough to disqualify them from raising those children. They can manage to stay in good enough health for the few remaining years of those kids childhood.
Picture the kid accidentally walking into their “dads” having sex. This is beyond sick. Just thinking about it makes me ill.
What are the grandparents going to do now? It seems like their lives are pretty much over and they are not even old or ill enough for the mercy of an impending death.
I’m certain that the two gay men will drive both children to drug abuse, mental illness, and a whole host of other problems. There is nothing but misery here and there is absolutely no hope. Welcome to hell.
Since their existence is based upon destruction and not procreation, they have to indoctrinate and abuse others into their “lifestyle”. Now they have the force of government on their side.
It’s disgusting. But it’s disgusting all the way around.
Scotland has a lot of social problems, of which this junkie is one.
No matter how badly I think about the social services office (and I do find their actions here appalling)- if this woman hadn’t got herself hooked on heroin she wouldn’t be in this fix in the first place.
I hate junkies. When you see the way they act and the problems they cause in the city it’s difficult to think of them as human.
Having said that. I can tell by looking at the photo that she is indeed recovering from her addiction. Regardless of which woman it is in the photo, she’s got too much meat on her bones to be an active addict.
Leaving the gay couple out of it for the moment- I don’t see how the social services people can justify taking the children away from the grandparents. They’re blood kin. They’re always going to have a more active interest in the welfare of the children than a random couple.