[freedomwarrior998]

So much for the propaganda "polls" released by ABC and CBS. Notice that the sample size for the Quinnipiac poll is more than double either the ABC or CBS polls, and uses Registered voters rather than "adults."

We need to get the word out on this one, because the perverts are going to trumpet the ABC and CBS propaganda.

[TurtleUp]

Looks like 55% of registered voters are unqualified to compete for Miss USA.

[ZULU]

And Quinnipiac is a left-leaning poll run by a Democrat.

[ElectricStrawberry]

From April 21 - 27, Quinnipiac University surveyed 2,041 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of +/- 2.2 percentage points.

"Registered voters" are not "voters".....common flaw in Quinni polls.

You get a well-vetted pool of actual voters....and the percentages will go up even more for traditional marriage.

[SeattleBruce]

I'm curious how these numbers may have drifted down historically. That's more what I'm concerned about. In any case, we need to continue to fight for the definition of marriage that we find coming from the Holy Skrit.

[NYC Republican]

Any way you slice it, if these numbers are to be believed, this can’t be good.

[tlb]

In the long run the current polls don’t matter. If there is one state with legal gay marriage, eventually every state will be required to recognize it even if they do not permit locally. It parallels the situation in the 1950s as localities forbidding divorce were required to recognize Nevada divorces. Absent a Constitutional Amendment, The Defense of Marriage Act as a statute cannot trump the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution. This principle of law goes back to John Marshall.

And that’s even before getting into the issues of Equal Protection that are raised as additional states legalize the matter on their own.

The pro-gay marriage legal groups have been biding their time, allowing matters to mature. I really don’t think it’s too many more sessions before the Supreme Court invalidates the final legal barriers.

[windsorknot]

I just turned my radio off after listening to Neal Boortz tell us that we needed to “get over” our opposition to gay “marriage”.

[LearsFool]

a law in their state allowing same-sex couples to marry

A what?? Such a "law" is as sane as one allowing dogs to be cats.

The battle was lost once we let our enemy dictate the language used. (But of course, somebody'll come along shortly and tell me I'm just being nitpicky about words.)

[concerned about politics]

American voters oppose 55 - 38 percent a law in their state allowing same-sex couples to marry

Well duh! Every free person who was "allowed" to vote made that perfectly clear.

[Antoninus]

And yet, amazingly, the GOP runs away from this issue like their hair is on fire.

I'm convinced that nearly all the Republicans have homosexuals in high-up positions on their staffs. The homos have made it a point to get such positions--they've admitted as much.

[FreepShop1]

but support 57 - 38 percent allowing same-sex couples to form civil unions

Meaning just a matter of time until the same amount support gay marriage. Drip, drip, drip...the gay agenda. Take baby steps and immerse America in gayness like boiling a frog slowly. Eventually we just don't care anymore.

[Tanniker Smith]

http://digg.com/political_opinion/Gay_Rights_Intimidation

It took a day, but they're trying to intimidate.
Actually, they're trying to take over a day old thread when the conservatives probably aren't coming back to it.

[fwdude]

I'm sick of the increasingly skewed language utilized in these polls by leftist liberal re-engineers. I've seen some of these, where answering “no” to same-sex "marriage" makes you somehow look like a hateful slave owner.

[metmom]

ping