Posted on 04/29/2009 5:15:47 PM PDT by Delacon
Arlen Specter’s announcement this week of his plans to switch to the Democrat side of the aisle is sending shockwaves throughout the country.
No one is surprised as to the motives behind the defection, as Pennsylvania conservatives’ ire over Senator Specter and his big government leanings are very well-known. These tensions were headed to a breaking point in advance of Specter’s 2010 re-election bid and the switch was necessary to keep his hopes of political survival alive. It is in how the GOP responds to this bombshell however that will dictate its impact on the future of the conservative limited government movement.
Staring down the barrel of the immediate policy consequences of the Specter switch will give freedom-loving conservatives a good deal of heartburn. Specter will work to endear himself to his new party and their march toward the Obama agenda of big government. Socialized medicine, a massive carbon cap-and-trade tax hike, union-empowering card check legislation: all these liberal policy wish-list items now have new life. A sixty-vote margin in the Senate is now guaranteed to beat back the threat of a conservative filibuster against any of these proposals and many on the Right, to include myself, are worried about this newly strengthened Democratic steamroller paving America’s way towards socialism.
Surely many in the conservative soft-middle are already preparing their arguments for why it’s important for the GOP to come closer to the center (i.e. the Left). Some Republicans in Congress will reason that they must acquiesce to the Democrats on much of the policy agenda to have any hope of slipping in modest wins for conservative constituencies. Those more obsessed with power will seek this same approach in order to benefit their status on key committees and ensure the survival of pet projects for their districts and states. Certainly we will be able to depend on a core of rock-solid conservative champions like Jim DeMint and Tom Coburn in the Senate and Republican Study Committee Members in the House, but their ability to keep the GOP rooted in good, limited government principles will be significantly weakened by the “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” crowd.
Anticipating this latest crisis of conscience that Congressional Republicans will go through let me suggest that, in this political game of “chicken,” we shouldn’t turn first.
The strategy of cozying up to the liberal machine and hoping for the occasional table scrap was that of the content Republican minority during the early nineties in the days before the Contract with America. Fortunately, bold leaders like Dick Armey and Newt Gingrich chose not to buckle. They held Republicans together, took the fight directly to Democrats, and by standing on limited government, free market policy they were rewarded by the American electorate politically with control of Congress in 1994.
Consider too the fact that in today’s political environment, and despite the President’s perceived “rock star” status, Democrats have greatly resisted wholly owning the Obama agenda thus far. The fight over the trillion dollar stimulus plan in January was an early indicator. Pelosi, Reid, and Obama all spent a lot of time tinkering with language in the legislation in an effort to court some Congressional Republicans from the squishy center and claim the mantle of bipartisanship. Those efforts failed as almost every Republican (only three defections, all in the Senate, including the new Democrat Specter) stood together in voting against the bloated stimulus bill.
Now the larger health care debate has begun and Democrats have neatly worked a safety-valve into the budget resolution passed this week that will allow them to enact a government-run health care scheme through the reconciliation process, requiring only 51 votes. Nevertheless, that Democrat leaders are bending over backwards to show they would rather do it in a bipartisan way through the more rigorous regular-order process of achieving a 60-vote threshold is notable. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is leading a chorus of voices on the Left sounding the strong desire not to invoke reconciliation in order to pass health care legislation, even though they could, through numerous statements and a host of communications with the Republican conference.
Don’t let the touchy-feely nature of their bipartisan overtures fool you. Just like with the stimulus bill Democrats are afraid of being tagged with the political responsibility for their own party’s reform approach and want some Republican by-in for cover. What else could the reason be? If they whole-heartedly believed in the policy they were peddling they would proudly push it through on their own, even without the help of their caucus’ new member from Pennsylvania.
Those plotting the GOPs return to power should consider this in the wake of the Specter switch and take a lesson from Armey, Gingrich, and others that chose to go Right and actually won in spite of pressure to play ball.
Is Richard Shelby also a Benedict Arnold?
If you want to get rid of a member of any Party, that you do not like, you run someone against that person, in the PRIMARY!
It would be wrong for a United States President to dictate, to the grass roots of his or her own Party, who should or should not receive THEIR votes, in a Party Primary.
That would be tyrannical!
If you want to change America, you MUST control either the Democrat Party or the Republican Party.
If you do not want to be a Democrat?
Then you have only one choice left:
Control the Republican Party from the grass roots up!
There is NO OTHER OPTION if you want Conservative government.
The GOP can use back splints if it wants to. I want see a strong leader rise up to lead the Conservatives who have been disenfranchised from the GOP. We must unite and strive to establish a platform which reflects the morality and structure ingrained in the intent of our forefathers. Unquestionably what they did worked. What has been going on for the past 50 some odd years does not.
What the hell are you talking about?
Go back and read my post again.
LOLOL!!!!!
Hate to be the fly in your ointment but have you ever heard of James Lane Buckley?
“I want see a strong leader rise up to lead the Conservatives who have been disenfranchised from the GOP.”
She’s in Alaska.
Now the Democratic party is heavily socialist and grasping into communism.
I criticize my Libertarian friends, that they are not willing take the same approach. Take the issues that turn people off and put them away. Bring them out later like the Democrats are doing now..
It won’t take long for people around here to start calling her a RINO, too.
Personally. he never gave any encouragement to me on the Republican side ... he is a political coward.
Perhaps
But The Republican Party, in it's current form
must stop supporting Socialism in all it's forms
That, in my view, is not negotiable
I really wish Palin would start her own party. I agree with her on almost everything, especially taking advantage of our own natural resources.
Well, I’m not going to run for office but I sure support true conservatives who do.
Specter can GTH.
Republicans need to resist the media efforts to try and overturn the refocus on conservative values. What the media wants is legitimization for its leftwing bias with Republican enabling. We may win, we may lose, but we should NOT give that to them.
“We just need a true conservative party”.
We just need to make the GOP true to conservatism. I don’t think any party can ever again pull off what the Republicans did against the Whigs. The two parties in power are just too researched and calculating to not handle the complaints of a 3rd party and respond to them. Yes, it doesn’t seem like it but we simply don’t have the rifts that caused the civil war. Any and every idea that a 3rd party brings to the table will be absorbed by one or both of the other two parties in a watered down version. We need to get off the 3rd party mantra and focus on the GOP. We may lose some here and there. Some pundits are pissed at Toomey. He may lose but so what if he does? We need the GOP to run to us, not the other way around. We need to offer the biggest voting block(independents, and they are the only growing voting block) a clear, concise and better alternative. Stick with the GOP and make it a better more conservative GOP.
Mercy...
Look, This is the action of a politician who could not win with the Republican party! Actually, he is against all the the original founding fathers stood for...
So, lets take the alternative - he could not win as a Republican so he changed parties. Lot of good that will do him since he has been against most of what the Democrats are for. Sooo... He is just a loser for both parties.
Now let’s get back to who is electible. Unfortunately for him, it is one that supports the Constitution! He or she will be the nominee (thank goodness).
If this does not work, the US and the Constitution is gone anyway - so just prepare for the revolution...
Baloney!
You third Party types would call the GOP a failure if Specter stayed in the GOP.
Now, with Specter out, you still can not swallow your pride and get real.
Third Parties will NOT work, will NOT win, and will only delight the Democrats!
I just don’t see many Republicans in Washington who are concerned with the party. Once McCain got the nomination, I felt that the party was lost. He only chose Palin because he knew conservatives were not happy with him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.