Posted on 04/24/2009 1:40:13 PM PDT by wagglebee
No you idiot, what YOU are proposing is national suicide.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
The Chinese would love this policy, seeing as Australia is a natural prospect for lebensraum, not to mention key raw materials.
Good Plan, let the Muzzies take over Oz.
I disagree. I think they should reduce it to 1/3 of a child. Don’t laugh.....some politician will suggest that one of these days.
An alternative would be to have Liberals have NO kids and Conservatives four per couple, minimum.
Some scary stuuff, the meme that the Earth is overpopulated is gaining steam.......utterly wrong that it is, and has been since Malthus scared the bejesus out of everyone in the 19th century.
I dread what is coming.
But as I smoke, I’ve been battle hardened and will merrily laugh as the NANNYISTS impose more and more draconian diktats upon the people...
In the near future, all citizens will be treated like smokers, or fatties, or whoever else is next on the list once the unpopular citizens are demonized and ostracized.
Enjoy.
“then let them die, and decrease the surplus population” - Scrooge.
Replacing "environmental suicide" with national suicide.
I have never been to Australia (though it is definitely on my list of places to visit), but from everyone I’ve talked to who has been there, it is IMPOSSIBLE to destroy the Australian environment. Except for the areas around the major coastal cities, the entire country is pretty much wide open, the Australian population could triple and it would hardly be noticed.
With the EPA now claiming total control of CO2 emissions, they have laid the groundwork for population control. I suspect this may be the main reason for the controversial move. If you regulate what humans exhale you control the amount by controlling the number of humans.
said this week that Australia’s 22 million people must be reduced to 7 million and that restricting each couple to one baby, as China does, is “one way of assisting to reduce the population” and avoiding “environmental suicide.”
When ever these groupscome out with these plans I say YOU FIRST.You think they are too many people then act now. No one is stopping you from leaving..
The Zero Population Growth commies are back.
They insist on reducing native births and then insist on increased immigration rates to offset the losses.
What a bunch of fruitcakes. They are convinced beyond any doubt that because much of Australia is a desert, that it is all it can ever be, or it’s not “environmental”.
They probably object to people living in buildings, because it is not “natural”. Latrines, as well, defeat the important value of not having poop all over the ground. And fire bad.
Right. They’re really anti-nativists.
The problem with this idea is that it seems that it will inevitably lead to a situation with few young people and many old ones who will be in need of support.
The young ones will have to be taxed to the max to support the old one’s pensions and health care. Its a longterm unsustainable proposition- unless the Australians find a way to reduce the older population.
It’s easier to change the politics of a nation to socialism when you import people at the bottom of the economic ladder who have no resentments towards socialism.
We are seeing it here too.
"have Liberals have NO kids and Conservatives four per couple"
The Left's Godmother, Margaret Sanger, wanted certain (non-white, uneducated) groups, to have a "no-child policy".
Certainly it would be fair, to apply that to the politically-demented (Ø-voters), as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.