Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
restricting each couple to one baby, as China does, is "one way of assisting to reduce the population" and avoiding "environmental suicide."

Replacing "environmental suicide" with national suicide.

11 posted on 04/24/2009 1:53:27 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Two blogs for the price of none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Constitutionalist Conservative

I have never been to Australia (though it is definitely on my list of places to visit), but from everyone I’ve talked to who has been there, it is IMPOSSIBLE to destroy the Australian environment. Except for the areas around the major coastal cities, the entire country is pretty much wide open, the Australian population could triple and it would hardly be noticed.


12 posted on 04/24/2009 1:56:50 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative
restricting each couple to one baby, as China does, is "one way of assisting to reduce the population" and avoiding "environmental suicide."

Replacing "environmental suicide" with national suicide.

I guess they haven't heard that China is suffering from and acute shortage of women because of their idiotic one child per couple laws. The ration of young men to young women is way out of proportion and causing all sort of problems. Hopefully Australians are smart enough to nip this in the bud. This type of control is slavery in one of its worst forms.

30 posted on 04/24/2009 7:54:53 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson