Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama open to torture memo prosecutions
The Washington Times ^ | Wednesday, April 22, 2009 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 04/22/2009 2:27:22 PM PDT by topfile

President Obama for the first time Tuesday opened the door to prosecuting former Bush administration officials, saying those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subject to criminal charges.

The president also left open the possibility for an independent commission to examine the interrogations of detainees with techniques that included waterboarding, sleep deprivation and other tactics that defenders said produced valuable information.

The remarks were a reversal from several days ago, when Mr. Obama said he wanted to move forward and his chief of staff appeared to rule out any prosecutions. The president took a harder line after a key congressional committee chairman and liberal pressure groups urged him not to take prosecutions off the table.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bds; bho44; bush; cheney; cia; ciainterrogation; ciainterrogationmemo; freakingcommie; neomccarthyism; nottorture; obama; obamunism; partisanwitchhunt; politicalpurge; pos; presidentbush; showtrials; torture; vicepresidentcheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: Ronin
I and a lot of others were of the opinion that we should have gone after Clinton’s minions for their multiple abuses of power. I don’t know about the rest of them, but I was talked out of it because once we start down that road, every outgoing administration is going to fear retribution from the winning team — and at some point it the future it will become a virtual certainty that a losing team, fearing the worst should the winners actually take office, will decide not to go. That would be the end of the American Republic. It now looks like that is going to happen anyhow.

This reminds me of the waining days of the roman Republic. The Romans had reached a point in which a former Consul could be charged for crimes after his enemies achieved power. they would declare the Consul's acts illegal, and would prosecute the former Consul and in many cases, he would be exiled and stripped of his citizenship.

It just such a fate that faced Caesar right at the time when he had conquered Gaul, crossed over to Britain and bridged the Rhine. Instead of receiving the thanks of a grateful republic, Caesar was about be charged as a criminal. He chose to march on Rome, and that was the end of the republic. Seems eerily similar to today.

81 posted on 04/23/2009 6:59:09 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

Agree that this will blow up on Obama too. Look how quickly Blair’s private memo came out after Cheney’s remarks.

Don’t expect it as fast, (that was crazy fast) but it should.

Feel the bipartisan Obama spirit yet?


82 posted on 04/23/2009 8:10:42 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

I heard Alan Colmes ranting and raving about the “crimes” this morning on Imus. It all seems like a huge overreach on the part of the libs and a congressional hearing and trial would bring out the crazies who would make Obama look like his innner loon.


83 posted on 04/23/2009 8:19:06 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Obama really did believe that stuff he was saying during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

The upside of this is that the rational Americans will soon see this for what it is and hopefully it drives Obama’s numbers right under 50.

Let’s see what Rasmussen comes up with in about 2-3 weeks.


84 posted on 04/23/2009 8:24:15 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: CaptainAmiigaf
I wasn’t a ground pounder. Navy boot camp prepared you to live ON THE WATER

I thought about that after I posted. My "Duh!" My apologies to you and a big thank you for your service!!!

Sicksickness ... been there, done that, hated it! ;*)

85 posted on 04/23/2009 8:43:55 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece
I'm not. Have you forgotten how the CIA did everything in their power to destroy the Bush presidency? They leaked, they lied and did everything to undermine Bush. There were reams of articles written about it.

As far as staged, I saw Obama appear at other departmental headquarters and NONE of his appearances were greeted with such sustained and loud cheering, screaming and clapping in utter joy as at Langley.

Many articles and books were written calling the CIA a fifth column. I love your term "very low level" people. Others call them analysts. I, for one, don't believe the frenzied mass at that gathering is unrepresentative of the CIA. It needs to be cleaned up. Bush halfheartedly tried but failed.

86 posted on 04/23/2009 10:43:04 AM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FightThePower!

You have a good point. The staff bureaucrats are not necessarily patriots, even if they put that on their applications.


87 posted on 04/23/2009 10:46:16 AM PDT by Darwin Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: envisio

Envisio,

I appreciate the kind words, but I’m too young and stupid to post more frequently. I don’t want to step on toes, offend people here, etc. I’ve enjoyed reading for many years.

And I’m maybe too busy trying to find a new job in this delicious economy we have laid out before us. After several years as a commercial real state investment broker and becomming the firm’s youngest Partner ever, it’s still a tremendous task to find work either with a developer or lender or anybody “real” in the Los Angeles area. Between that and my background in running web sites and internet publishing companies, it’s annoying to hear that I am “overqualified” for various jobs, and yet all I want is a single job.

But at least I don’t have to worry about having a caterpillar in the same room as me. Oh, the horror! And, besides, Obama will save us all, won’t he?

What a joke, this Obama. If this “man” (maybe I should have said “male” since he’s no MAN) doesn’t manage to wake up the Republican Party then there is NO HOPE for the Republican Party. And no hope for this country’s futue.

-Mini


88 posted on 04/23/2009 12:45:21 PM PDT by Minime8276 (If this was a logical world, women would ride side-saddle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Minime8276
Welcome fellow Freeper. Hope to see many more post from you. It's therapeutic ya know.
89 posted on 04/23/2009 5:01:16 PM PDT by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: topfile
From Drudge:

********************************************


SHE DIDN'T
SHE DID


90 posted on 04/23/2009 8:16:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

I will never forget how a few at Langley undermined President Bush, but if you think the CIA is mostly in favor of Obama’s policies then you are quite mistaken.


91 posted on 04/26/2009 10:36:52 AM PDT by HelloooClareece ("We make war that we may live in peace". Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece
By the way, I love your handle. I think it was more than a few. All the articles I read and analysis by folks writing in National Review, etc. considered the betrayal of Bush to be deep and wide.

If it was just a few, the impact would have been much less. Remember the outright revolt of the CIA when the Bush administration tried to figure out who leaked damaging and questionable (as in value of analysis) documents? If the CIA truly is as conservative as you maintain, I would think they would have welcomed a probe, but the outcry was loud and made even louder when the Democrats on the Hill complained.

Good grief, the Washington Times did a series on the CIA as to what happened to the CIA and how it developed into an untrustworthy agency that threatened the nation's security.

I think everyone is aware that the military and intelligence services are more conservative than the population at large, but something happened at the CIA that I don't quite understand. Perhaps there are more conservatives than liberals, but it appears that the liberals have much much more influence and clout to get their way.

So now we have the situation of the last week that I now read that the CIA is hostile about the interrogation memos being released. I wish I could say that this is what they wanted and now let them deal with it, but it is too serious for such a flippant attitude. May God help us.

92 posted on 04/26/2009 10:47:25 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

Good post.

I see your point Dave and understand perfectly how you came to your assessment. Remember though how much damage the Plame fiasco caused with only a few being in that loop.

With Brooks being installed this has only to get worse. I fear for our security just knowing about that woman. I also think she’ll be the most scrutinized person at CIA so maybe there’s hope.


93 posted on 05/01/2009 10:28:33 AM PDT by HelloooClareece ("We make war that we may live in peace". Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson