Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Looks like Kirsten Gillibrand has been rolled by Chuck on the gun issue. Repealing this law is a back door registration scheme. Soon the will keep the records for 90 days, then forever.
1 posted on 04/20/2009 8:23:35 AM PDT by Hacklehead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hacklehead

Hey Shuner...How does one reconcile being both a Jew, and a Nazi, at the same time?


2 posted on 04/20/2009 8:27:24 AM PDT by DGHoodini (God's gonna getcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

Before they can take guns, they have to know who has ‘em.


3 posted on 04/20/2009 8:28:55 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Our flag still waves! And we shall NEVER let them tear it down!" - Alan Keyes, 4-15-09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

I knew this Gillibrand was full of crap. You cannot get elected to her district by being anti-gun. She sold her constituents a line of BS to get elected.

Hey Schumer, people who are buying guns illegally don’t fill out background check forms. Schmuck!


4 posted on 04/20/2009 8:32:25 AM PDT by NoKoolAidforMe (1-20-09--The Beginning of an Error..............1-20-13--Change we can look forward to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead
Sooooooooo....what about the promise made to Americans that these records would in fact be immediately destroyed after the background checks? THAT was the compromise to mollify folks who worried that the records might later be used against citizens by the federal government later on, right?

Goes to show that these sorts of "promises" are worthless.

5 posted on 04/20/2009 8:35:14 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead
If you think the NCICS destroys the records from instant background checks I got some beach front land to sell you in Arizona.

The federal government has already got their list, the Tiahardt amendment makes sure they the ONLY ONES that has got access to that list.

So, since there is a list, I say the people having access to that list is the fist step to getting rid of it. It would sure bud confirms it's existence.

8 posted on 04/20/2009 8:42:44 AM PDT by macebowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

This is perfectly understandable behavior, once you acknowledge that Schumer and Obama are both power crazed Communists who FEAR an armed citizenship...

An unarmed man is an enslaved subject.
An armed man is a free citizen.


9 posted on 04/20/2009 8:46:28 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

Amazing thing about Washington. It changes political opinions quickly. Maybe Soros is helping Schumer convince Gillibrand with his poisoned money.


10 posted on 04/20/2009 8:47:26 AM PDT by ZULU (Obamanation of Desolation is President. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead
Part of the Brady Law was the introduction of Instant Check as soon as possible with the caveat that records would be destroyed at the end of the day or until the request was Approved or Denied.

I have called on NICS that had been written incorrectly and hte answer I recieved was .."Have the purchaser fill out another as we do not have records of that transaction."

Chuckie wants the records kept to trace SS#'s, if provided. It's the only real ID number included on the 4473 as there is little other information to glean from that data.

12 posted on 04/20/2009 8:53:55 AM PDT by Pistolshot (The Soap-box, The Ballot-box, The Jury-box, And The Cartridge-Box ...we are past 2 of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

How does keeping records of CLEAR background checks for legal purchases help crack down on ILLEGAL gun sales? It is not the legal gun owners that are the problem.

The conspiracy theorist deep inside wonders if 24 hours isn’t enough time for them to extract and archive the information and that perhaps these guys just want to know where to send the brown shirts when the time comes - ‘allegedly’...


17 posted on 04/20/2009 9:08:19 AM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

It’s New York State. I’ll bet that if they have the records and the law expires and reverts back to 24 hrs, if it goes back to 90 days they will still have the records that were supposed to be destroyed with the 24 hr. version of the law.


18 posted on 04/20/2009 9:13:29 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (To stand up for Capitalism is to hope Teleprompter Boy fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead
New York Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand are calling for the repeal of federal policy requiring records of gun background checks be destroyed after 24 hours.

The Democratic lawmakers say the Tiahrt Amendment restricts police from using gun trace information.

They said such information is crucial to cracking down on illegal gun trafficking and reducing gun violence.

They are BOTH lying sacks of shiite. The Tiahrt Amendment does NOT restrict LEOs in any way. What it DOES restrict is pols like Chuck the Schmuck, Bloomberg and Richie Daley in Chicago from using the data for Civil lawsuits and Political Witch Hunts of Gun Owners.

Every Law Enforcement agency - including the BATF - want the Tiahrt Amendment kept as is.(1) It's only gun grabbing politicians and the Brady Bunch who want it repealed.

(1) This is from every search result I've found.

28 posted on 04/20/2009 11:07:31 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead
-- Repealing this law is a back door registration scheme. Soon the will keep the records for 90 days, then forever. --

The records are already kept in contravention of the law. There is no penalty for that.

31 posted on 04/20/2009 2:00:40 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

What, you think they don’t already keep them forever regardless of what the law says?

What they want here is the ability to do fishing expeditions from the comfort and convenience of their own office.


32 posted on 04/20/2009 2:24:42 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

We have to vote Schumer out of office ASAP.
he is one of the top 10 jerks we have in office nationally IMO.


33 posted on 04/20/2009 3:32:03 PM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hacklehead

NOTE: The 2nd Amendment is SELF-incorporated to all government entities at every level. It is MORE ABSOLUTE than the 1st Amendment, or any of the others, because the wording forbids not only CONGRESS, but ANYONE from infringing on it. The 1st says “Congress shall make no law...”. The 2nd say “shall NOT be infringed!” Period! End of debate!


34 posted on 04/20/2009 7:11:01 PM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson