Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kenavi
"Like it or not, it’s sage advice.

Yep. And not popular here. Goldwater would be/is rolling over in his grave. What the Republican party is today is not what he created in 1964.

15 posted on 04/17/2009 1:07:01 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Big_Monkey
What the Republican party is today is not what he created in 1964.

He didn't create Reagan, Reagan was the better man.

28 posted on 04/17/2009 1:10:31 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey
Goldwater didn't create the Republican Party in 1964. It was created 110 years earlier in 1854, by socially-conservative Christians who were morally opposed to slavery and felt the Whigs and Dems weren't doing anything about it.
30 posted on 04/17/2009 1:10:50 PM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey
I didn't know Goldwater ran on a platform of “gay rights” and same-sex “marriage” in 1964. He endorsed those things only late in life after he found out that supporting such nonsense could get him some good press (for the first time in his career).

The McCain clique is using the same issue to get back in good standing with the media. McCain basked in the media glow as a “maverick” Republican for years until he ended up as Obama’s campaign opponent. Then, the media turned on him like the vipers they are. Now that the election is over, McCain and his lame daughter and cronies want the media's support again. Supporting the homo agenda and attacking religious conservatives is a sure ticket to get the leftist media drooling for you.

38 posted on 04/17/2009 1:13:58 PM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey
Goldwater would be/is rolling over in his grave.

I missed the part where Goldwater said he was for changing the definitions of words to appease your opponents.

Is that what you are saying Goldwater stood for?

53 posted on 04/17/2009 1:18:19 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (I'd rather the world hate us then laugh at us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey

“Goldwater would be/is rolling over in his grave. “

He is, over big government. Free from the senility and influences of his liberal wife that began to besiege his mortal brain I doubt he would give a crap that gays can’t “marry”.


83 posted on 04/17/2009 1:27:49 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey; kenavi
Yep. And not popular here. Goldwater would be/is rolling over in his grave. What the Republican party is today is not what he created in 1964.

Maybe so, however, it is the Republican Party that Reagan designed, and he was successful where Goldwater was not.
106 posted on 04/17/2009 1:37:07 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey
"Yep. And not popular here. Goldwater would be/is rolling over in his grave. What the Republican party is today is not what he created in 1964. "

I didn't support Goldwater's Republican party. That was a monumental disaster. I supported Reagan's.


153 posted on 04/17/2009 2:03:17 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson