Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators to Napolitano: Show us the data
Michelle Malkin ^

Posted on 04/17/2009 10:06:53 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Senators to Napolitano: Show us the data By Michelle Malkin • April 17, 2009 12:58 PM

Senators Coburn, Brownback, DeMint, Burr, Murkowski, Inhofe, and Vitter sent the following letter to DHS Secretary Napolitano yesterday concerning the DHS conservative hit job:

April 16, 2009

The Honorable Janet Napolitano Secretary The Department of Homeland Security 310 7th street, S.W. Washington, DC 20528-0150

VIA FASCMILLE

Dear Secretary Napolitano,

We write today concerning the release of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” prepared by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, of the Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division.

While we agree that we must fight extremists who are both foreign and domestic we are troubled by some of the statements your department included as fact in the report titled above, without listing any statistical data to back up such claims.

First, your report states that “Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists…” without listing any data to support such a vile claim against our nation’s veterans.

Second, the report states that the millions of Americans who believe in the Second Amendment are a potential threat to our national security. Why? Do you have statistics to prove that law-abiding Americans who purchase a legal product are being recruited by so-called hate groups?

Thirdly, the report states that those that believe in issues such as pro-life legislation, limited government, and legal versus illegal immigration are potential terrorist threats. We can assure you that these beliefs are held by citizens of all races, party affiliation, male and female, and should not be listed as a factor in determining potential terror threats. A better word usage would be to describe them as practicing their First Amendment rights.

Also, you list those that bemoan the decline of U.S. stature and the loss of U.S. manufacturing capability to China and India as being potential rightwing extremists. We would suggest that the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs in the manufacturing industry to foreign countries are not potential terror threats, but rather honest Americans worried about feeding their families and earning a paycheck.

In closing, we support the mission of DHS in protecting our country from terror attacks and are proud of the many DHS employees who make this possible in conjunction with our state and local law enforcement. We ask that DHS not use this report as a basis to unfairly target millions of Americans because of their beliefs and the rights afforded to them in the Constitution. We also ask that you provide us with the data that support the unfair claims listed in the report titled above and to present us with the matrix system used in collecting and analyzing this data?

Finally, we look forward to your prompt reply and we offer our assistance to DHS in our shared effort to fight terrorism both home and abroad by using data that is accurate and independent of political persuasion.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dhs; dhssteenkindata; gestapolitano; homelandsecurity; napolitano; rightwing; rightwingextremism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Sub-Driver

and if that doesn’t work, we shall sent you another very stern letter.....


21 posted on 04/17/2009 10:19:55 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Keep the HEAT on folks!

Write your Senators!!

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Write your reps!!!

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml


22 posted on 04/17/2009 10:20:09 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Great job..... I like in your face approaches to a problem.


23 posted on 04/17/2009 10:20:43 AM PDT by Gator113 (I'm a PROUD RIGHT WING EXTREMIST.... Obama has failed, IMPEACH Obama NOW....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Dear Secretary Napolitano,

If the single case of Timothy McVeigh means all Veterans should be monitored as possible terrorist does the same hold true for the 9/11 hijackers?

sincerely,
McGruff

24 posted on 04/17/2009 10:21:26 AM PDT by McGruff (I guess it all depends upon what the meaning of "bow" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Tim McVeigh had connections with Iraqis in the USA but Clinton never followed up on it.


25 posted on 04/17/2009 10:23:42 AM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I would prefer they had written the question in a manner to get closer to the problem.

Perhaps:”Why do you lump the American Public into every victim group you can define? Returning servicemen are not easy prey for radical recruiters. Nor are people who love the US Constitution and/or abhor abortion mindless Single Issue robots. Why do you think Americans are Single Issue robots? Why do you categorize us in voting blocks? Do you not think we can make decisions for ourselves? What makes you think you are capable of managing that department? Please resign at once!”

26 posted on 04/17/2009 10:24:13 AM PDT by PosterPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
"If veterans should be watched because of Tim McVeigh, shouldn’t Muslims be watched because of Osama bin Laden and Mohammad Atta?"

OJ Simpson murdered his white wife. Should all black men married to white women be surveilled just in case they decide to decapitate their wife?

27 posted on 04/17/2009 10:26:19 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

Anyone here go to the gun range and smile like a grinning fool?

I doubt she ever fired that shotgun.


28 posted on 04/17/2009 10:26:19 AM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

We don’t have any like that in Wisconsin.


29 posted on 04/17/2009 10:26:58 AM PDT by devistate one four (CW II on the way! Stand by. TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: albie
Seven Senators - goodby Republicans, you are no longer Conservative ...
30 posted on 04/17/2009 10:28:38 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I heard Mike Savage yesterday announcing his lawsuit—he is counting on all his listeners to contact their legislators and DEMAND Napolitano resign.


31 posted on 04/17/2009 10:29:45 AM PDT by spiderfern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“We also ask that you provide us with the data that support the unfair claims listed in the report titled above and to present us with the matrix system used in collecting and analyzing this data?”

????? Did they really use a question mark???????
Why? I would have used, in the least, a period. At the most, an exclamation point! And I wouldn’t have used “ask,” I would have written “demand!”


32 posted on 04/17/2009 10:30:22 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I say Go Michael.


33 posted on 04/17/2009 10:30:26 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

. . .and they will hear back; when it hell freezes over?


34 posted on 04/17/2009 10:30:41 AM PDT by cricket (Don't bow for me. . .Obama (America's 'sorry' President))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

“If veterans should be watched because of Tim McVeigh, shouldn’t Muslims be watched because of Osama bin Laden and Mohammad Atta?”

Problem solved. Nepalolitano can send the $50 million typically spent for these studies to DuncanWaring along with a letter thanking same for common sense.


35 posted on 04/17/2009 10:30:43 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

Handicapper General Diana Moon Glampers. Look it up.


36 posted on 04/17/2009 10:31:10 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Yes. I like what you say. See there are thinking sane people in the world.


37 posted on 04/17/2009 10:31:20 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
If veterans should be watched because of Tim McVeigh, shouldn’t Muslims be watched because of Osama bin Laden and Mohammad Atta?

Bingo! Call Rush. . .And e-mail Fox News. . .have not heard that perfect rationale yet!.

38 posted on 04/17/2009 10:32:51 AM PDT by cricket (Don't bow for me. . .Obama (America's 'sorry' President))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This needs not to go away. If it’s allowed to be buried (and the MSM would be only too happy to oblige) the DHS becomes just another tool for domestic politics. Napolitano insists that ideology isn’t part of this but the report reeks of it. The McVeigh smear on veterans is proof of it. Napolitano knows she’s crossed the line; what she and her people are waiting to see is what happens when they do and how much more they can get away with if nothing happens.


39 posted on 04/17/2009 10:33:04 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Don’t forget Barack Hussein Obama. Seriously needs watching. He’s the most dangerous threat alive to our continued freedom, our national security and sovereignty. Definitely a domestic enemy of the constitution. Well, domestic? No documentary proof of that.


40 posted on 04/17/2009 10:33:11 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson