Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EDITORIAL: Killing pirates. The next target: Their sanctuaries on land
The Washington Times ^ | April 14, 2009 | Editorial

Posted on 04/14/2009 3:53:13 AM PDT by Scanian

Captain Richard Phillips was saved Sunday by an old-fashioned formula that pirates understand — Attack U.S. shipping, and you will die. Now that policy needs to be extended to the pirates' sanctuaries on land.

The Navy's bold actions were in sharp contrast to the instinctive waffling of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who promised that the Obama administration was seeking “an appropriate 21st-century response” to the pirates who seized a U.S.-flagged vessel and took its American captain hostage.

Thankfully, Vice Admiral William E. Gortney, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, gets it. He made it clear that “The United States government's policy is to not negotiate.” Such a clear statement of resolve was a refreshing change from President Obama's usual “let's talk about it” approach. Mr. Obama has said that the United States is “resolved to halt the rise of piracy in that region,” and the Defense Department reportedly is discussing ways to take the fight directly to the pirate safe havens. During his press conference on Easter Sunday, Adm. Gortney said matter-of-factly what that means: “The ultimate solution for piracy is on land.” Taking the offensive is the only remedy to the piracy disease, and there is ample precedent for such operations.

In 1851, the Navy sent the U.S. sloop-of-war Dale to Johanna Island, a pirate haven off the coast of Madagascar, in response to the seizure of Capt. Moore of the bark Maria by local strongman Sultan Abdullah bin Salim. The Dale's commander, Capt. Pearson, rejected any notion of ransom for Moore and instead demanded $20,000 from the pirates for our trouble, or he would open fire. In the ensuing negotiations, the sultan was willing only to give $5,000, most of which would be paid in trinkets, cattle and cotton cloth because of lack of cash

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: africa; bhoafrica; hillary; navy; piracy; piratebases; somalia; somalipirates

1 posted on 04/14/2009 3:53:13 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I’ll be surprised if it happens. I’m already hearing lefties go on about the poor, abused pirates, they’re just kids, they’re forced into this work, they have a legitimate grievance, etc etc. The usual nauseating stuff.


2 posted on 04/14/2009 3:58:35 AM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

While we need to take out their sanctuaries on land, before we do so, we need to take out the mother ships that are launching the small boats out at sea. We should simply sink them and not stop to pick up survivors. Let the sharks have them. Then we should use standoff weapons to take out the villages—yes, the entire villages—full of pirates.


3 posted on 04/14/2009 4:00:01 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley
hussein will talk the talk... but unlike President Bush... he is incapable of walking the walk.

LLS

4 posted on 04/14/2009 4:02:02 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

If I hear one more socialist talk about the pirates being inexperienced teenagers, I will puke.
I really don’t care if the pirates are 70 or 7. I just want pirates and their families dead and their homes and villages destroyed.
This is absolutely the only form of persuasion that is understood and it works.


5 posted on 04/14/2009 4:02:58 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (To stand up for Capitalism is to hope Teleprompter Boy fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

I wonder if one could make any money selling American flags to foreign shipping companies.


6 posted on 04/14/2009 4:04:27 AM PDT by muir_redwoods ( O.B.A.M.A. = One Big Asinine Mistake, America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley
I’ll be surprised if it happens.

I'd be disappointed if it did. Virtually all the ships being captured and hostages being taken and not from U.S. flagged vessels. And all the ransom being paid is being paid by other countries. Let them do it. We do not need another land campaign in the area.

7 posted on 04/14/2009 4:05:59 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Vice Admiral William E. Gortney, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, gets it.
He made it clear that “The United States government's policy is to not negotiate.”

I do believe that Hussein made it clear that we would. - Were not those FBI men negotiators?

8 posted on 04/14/2009 4:06:03 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
We do not need another land campaign in the area.

Why do we not?
You cannot argue that pirates are not “a common enemy of mankind,” nor can you argue that we should turn our face away from this type of festering boil on the butt of humanity.

We did that in Afghanistan for a decade and we know exactly how that turned out.

Destroying the land and sea infrastructure of this trash would take about 1 day by air.

9 posted on 04/14/2009 4:11:02 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
You cannot argue that pirates are not “a common enemy of mankind,” nor can you argue that we should turn our face away from this type of festering boil on the butt of humanity.

Then let the rest of mankind take care of them. Why should we spend billions of dollars and who knows how many lives eradicating a problem that mainly festers for other countries?

Destroying the land and sea infrastructure of this trash would take about 1 day by air.

And not much longer to rebuild. Unless you destroy it and leave some control in place to keep it from reappearing then you's swatting at gnats with sledge hammers.

10 posted on 04/14/2009 4:17:43 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
” A long-term solution to the piracy problem necessarily will be political and necessitate stabilizing the ungoverned areas where piracy has taken root. This will require more than a simple aid program.”
No, it doesn't require us to fork over taxpayer money for “aid programs”. It requires the simple application of sufficient high explosives and projectiles to make them unequivocally clear that their chosen form of community activism is a losing proposition.

Making matters more complicated is that the insular Somalis tend to be resentful of political meddling and military action in their affairs, a Catch-22 that the U.S. forces encountered in the early 1990s with disastrous effect.
Well, there's not much I can say with this logic. Since we know that the Somalis are going to be resentful, we should choose the appeasement option. What's another 9 or 10 million welfare recipients in the grand scheme of things?
Since their entire GDP is only 5 billion or so, and 10 percent of them are already living here, let's just give them a package deal and be done with it. /sarc off

11 posted on 04/14/2009 4:19:19 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 163)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

The USN will put Obama ashore so he can go and bow to the pirate king


12 posted on 04/14/2009 4:32:46 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

“Attack U.S. shipping, and you will die.” I like it!

Pay us for coming here and wasting time on scum? I love it!


13 posted on 04/14/2009 4:41:59 AM PDT by Bulldawg Fan (Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
the instinctive waffling of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who promised that the Obama administration was seeking “an appropriate 21st-century response”

I'm certainly no fan of Hillary, but this may have been just garden variety stalling chatter. The call as to when/if to pull the trigger wasn't hers to make, and for whatever reason it wasn't being made right away. In the meantime, encouraging the pirates to think they had a basically unlimited amount of time to "negotiate" wasn't necessarily a bad thing. If Hillary was asking "What are we going to do? What am I supposed to say?", she may very well have been getting the response "Just stall."

14 posted on 04/14/2009 6:00:29 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
If I hear one more socialist talk about the pirates being inexperienced teenagers, I will puke.

I ask a very liberal acquaintance yesterday if being killed by an "inexperienced teenager" made you any more or less dead.

15 posted on 04/14/2009 6:34:20 AM PDT by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
And not much longer to rebuild.

Remind me again if you please. How much rebuilding can dead people do?

TIA.

16 posted on 04/14/2009 6:38:34 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Remind me again if you please. How much rebuilding can dead people do?

Not as much as the ones you miss can.

17 posted on 04/14/2009 6:46:20 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Not as much as the ones you miss can.

So don't miss. And if by chance you do repeat the cluster bombing as often as necessary.

500 lb bombs are cheap.

Once we've reduced those 'pirate villages' to ashes the rest of them will learn that qhat farming is more profitable and far less lethal.

L

18 posted on 04/14/2009 6:59:24 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Riley

Obama may be evil but he is not stupid. Now that the public, moved by the media to believe that He is different from Carter and Clinton on international affairs and national defense, he may indeed risk some bombarding of the areas where the pirates embark from.


19 posted on 04/14/2009 9:52:20 AM PDT by phillyfanatic ( iT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Unless I see video to the contrary, my suspicion is that the sequence of events went something like this:

Commander to snipers: “Obama gave the green light to use force if the Captain’s life is in imminent danger. Isn’t that a rifle being pointed at the Cap’n right now? Looks like imminent danger to me. Synchronize your shots and let ‘em have it.”


20 posted on 04/14/2009 2:42:51 PM PDT by Scanian (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson