“Hey, Barney! Wanna meet Spike?”
“No, thanks, Biww. I’m awweady fuww!”
Posted on 04/13/2009 10:02:53 PM PDT by ebiskit
They will throw so much sh_t at us that we spend all our time defending ourselves and coming back from their lies that the printing presses which do the real damage never stop.
At the end of his firs two years we are so hopelessly in debt that they win we lose.
The primary goal is to slow down an illegal dynamic entry by making the primary entrance more breach resistant, giving the occupants a bit more time to respond. It would be difficult (and expensvie) to make make the entrance breach-proof; and, as you pointed out, against the law.
Some type of well hidden early detection system would also be a good supplement.
Patriotic dissent does no exist in socialist states. Since socialism is perfection in their view, dissent is treason.
“Hey, Barney! Wanna meet Spike?”
“No, thanks, Biww. I’m awweady fuww!”
Well, those words no longer have weight since the federal oligarchy decided to usher in the affiramtive action fraud by ignoring legal challenges to his constitutionally defined eligibility. The Constitutional contract was abrogated by those elected and appointed and cannot be re-instituted so long as Democrats hold power to continue the federal oligarchy of their dreams. They will not relinquish power this time, they have a big bag of ACORNs to insure their continued reign until the O bow ma militias are in place..
Now this is interesting. It reminds me of when the dems tried to kill homeschooling and senator Dick Army prevented it. I hope we still have some people like him in the Senate.
If we don't stop their juggernaut, and soon,(right now the only potential we have is to destroy his numbers,) we are looking at a socialistic country in his first 4 years,IMHO.
That is why the affiramtive action liar-in-chief’s minions infecting FR of late keep trying to divert attention from exposing his current constitutional ineligibility to waiting the four years until another election occurs. R Emanuels four year plan will be devastating to the dead Constitutional Republic, if fully achieved.
Ping for later
>I warned FReepers at the time of the formation of DHS and the PATRIOT Act that they were but excuses to consolidate powers to be turned over to a leftist president at the end of the Bush Administration.<
You most certainly were right. As much as I dislike LBJ, his words were and are alarmingly true in this day and age:
“You do not examine legislation in light of the benefits it will convey if properly administered, but in light of the wrongs it would do and the harms it would cause if improperly administered.” Lyndon Baines Johnson
Say exactly what every audience he is in front of wants to hear and than do what you were going to do anyway.
Blame us for everything and then advance the major socialist agenda in the background never the foreground.
Like the tea parties, they are never mentioned in the DBM unless in a demoralizing way,same BS.
They think they can get away with anything and we won't catch on.
The father of modern indentured constituency.
His progenitor was more to the point:
Dear Congressman / Senator _____(yours here)____
I am outraged, hurt and insulted by the paranoid and politically partisan report from the Obama Administration that castigates and stereotypes all veterans as potential “Extremists”.
We all know how to read between the lines and we as honorable former federal employees and officials who put our lives on the line multiple times for the freedoms of ALL Americans - we know federal double-talk when we see it.
Lets all not try to kid ourselves or play denial games about how outrageous and insulting this trashy bit of partisan-hack-hit-piece really is.
This is politically motivated and we all know it.
Further, the report was deliberately written with vague, inflammatory, divisive, defamatory and libelous language devised to try to instill fear in all Americans of our honorable veterans instead of honoring their service.
No amount of denial, double talk or mealy-mouthed excuses from arrogant officials in the Obama Administration can hide the message and signal that the Obama Administration wants law enforcement at all levels to target veterans for extra “surveillance”.
They can attempt to deny it and spin damage control all they want - we are calling BS on it.
This is simply one more piece of evidence that this Administration itself has a Stalinist level of paranoia and is populated with Far Left Wing Extremists.
This cannot stand, and to avoid further damaging and dividing this nation the Obama Administration MUST retract this statement in full, admit fully that they are wrong, and issue a nationally televised apology.
We will not rest until this is done.
I am also asking Senator & ______ and Congressman______ to look into this matter and take appropriate action. We need bi-partisan congressional condemnation of this reprehensible attack from this administration on our fine men and women serving past, present and future.
Respectfully Signed,
A Military Retiree AND Veteran from a family of Veterans.
(Send to members of both parties.)
This is a last ditch effort by Obama to make all of us who don’t agree with him out to be some kind of nuts.
Obama is trying desperately to silence us through fear tactics. See it for what it really is people ..an attempt to take away our freedom of speech.
FUBO
Back then, the Dems didn't have the almighty Dept. of Homeland Security to do their dirty work. Congressman Dick Armey was the House Majority Leader. Today's Republicans are all bark and no bite. If they seem to be conservative, it's only because of their minority status.
Steele the Silent One probably agrees with this.
What would that have to do with anything? The AES standard, for example, was not developed by Americans. All candidates were thoroughly analyzed based on a variety of factors by a mostly academic community. It’s unlikely a backdoor exists in any of them. All encryption ciphers are “known” in the sense that all of their security rests on prevention of disclosure of the key. You can look at the algorithm, but it’s not going to give you any information to link the ciphertext with the plaintext.
What if the government obtained the keys? That is possible, right? I imagine the goverment is constantly trying to decipher foreign communications.
I never agreed with the creation of DHS or even TSA. However, I still believe we needed to do exactly what the Patriot Act did. Spy on the Terrorists. It was effective for exactly what it was intended to do.
The real problem here isn't the Patriot Act. It is who was elected. Elections have consequences. Many mindless D voters or fence sitter "moderates" who voted for Obama have no idea what they voted for or what they are going to get. They will not be happy.
Make no mistake, Obama will spy on you no matter what, Patriot Act (used in ways it is not supposed to be used) or no Patriot Act.
He will paint us as Terrorists, no matter what. The Patriot Act was written for people who wanted to bring the Republic down (Terrorists). It was not written for people who want to preserve the Republic (law abiding Constitution followers.)
For Obama to redefine the term Terrorist to include people who want to see the Republic survive as it was intended to be is the problem, not the Patriot Act. If the Patriot Act is the problem, then ANY law is a problem because RATS will always redefine what it means. Look at what they are trying to do to redefine the 2nd Amendment.
The Patriot Act is beside the point. The RATS will do what they want, including redefining words. They have redefined marriage, gender, gun rights, voter rights, how you become a citizen, I could go on. The point is, to them, we are now terrorists. I am not surprised.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.