Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attack Raises Debate on Guns for Sailors
Wall Street Journal ^ | April 11, 2009 | John W. Miller and Paulo Prada

Posted on 04/11/2009 8:18:21 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Edited on 04/11/2009 8:49:37 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

This week's pirate attack on an American vessel in the Indian Ocean has renewed a fierce debate in the shipping industry: Should sailors carry guns?

Many sailors support the idea. But ship owners and naval officials tend to say armed crews would only add to the volatile mix in a hostile environment.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armthesailors; banglist; guns; pirates; selfdefense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: reaganaut1

As long as we have a gutless liberal administration these attacks will continue. We need to napalm all Somalia ports and sink every vessel leaving them. Then when we catch them in the act we hang them from the yardarm, no quarter.


41 posted on 04/11/2009 9:59:59 AM PDT by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard

Yeah, “Shoot, Shovel and Shut Up” would have that onerous “shovelling” part eliminated, too!


42 posted on 04/11/2009 10:01:38 AM PDT by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge

Rather than guns, Obama proposed each ship’s crew should:

1) Attend seminars that promote multiculuralism
2) Carry Extra copies of the Koran
3) UN pamphlets on mediating disputes
4) Contain lyrics to kumbaya
5) Understand that the pirates are actually ‘victims’ and are being exploiting by capitalism
6) Any action taken against the pirates will be considered RACIST”

The above would be a lot funnier if it were a joke......


43 posted on 04/11/2009 10:07:32 AM PDT by LoneStarC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

That’s where the armory would come into play. In port or non-international waters, the arms could be locked up. The ship itself is always deemed sovereign US territory, no matter where it is located.


no i´m sorry but you are wrong. the ship is not US territory once you enter the territory waters of a forreing country. same as if you would drive your car to canada for example. once you enter a country you are a US citizen who is “guest” in a forreign country and you will have to obey to the laws of this country. try saying a police officer in canada you will not search my car because this is US territory :-) you will earn a good laught while he will search your car that´s all. same goes for ships. so if this kind of weapons are against this countries law they will not care if you have locked them up in an armory or carry them in the open. the result will be the same. you will get arrested because you commited a crime in this country. i will give you another example. i live in austria. so i can get in my car drive to the city of amsterdam (netherlands) and legal can buy and smoke as much pot as i want because it´s legal there. but once i leave the country i will get arrested if i try to take my “totally legal buyed pot” with me back to my country. because in my country it´s against the law to have pot.


44 posted on 04/11/2009 10:13:28 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner
I also wonder how “responsible” he would be, or if the owner of the boat is held responsible. He is just the captain and an employee. The owner is a corporation. On a typical fishing run, he probably has about a $billion in horsepower riding on the deck and I'm sure there would be some high lawyering going on. I don't think they would throw him to the wolves and say they knew nothing about the guns. The guns aren't in his name. I also believe everyone knows him and probably thinks nothing about him doing anything “illegal”. They don't care and don't feel threatened. If he was a drug runner, maybe.
45 posted on 04/11/2009 10:18:24 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
THIS IS EDWARD TEACH, AKA BLACKBEARD THE PIRATE, BEFORE:

Photobucket

THIS IS BLACKBEARD THE PIRATE AFTER

Photobucket

(WELL, PART OF HIM ANYWAY. GUESS THEY WERE SHORT OF PIKES.)
QUESTIONS???
OF COURSE, OLD ED WAS A WHITE GUY -- KILLED BY OTHER WHITE GUYS FOR PIRACY.

COULD RACE, COLOR OR RELIGION BE PLAYING A ROLE IN THE CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR TOWARD THE POOR, DESPERATE, MISUNDERSTOOD MUSLIM SOMALI PIRATES??

PERISH THE THOUGHT!!


46 posted on 04/11/2009 10:31:21 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

Vulcan.


47 posted on 04/11/2009 10:47:25 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Give each guy on the ship this weapon and that should take care of this problem.

Automatic shotgun and grenade launcher, 32 round drum, it would sink their boats. Forget the water hoses, no one is walking in to this fire power.

AA-12

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c


48 posted on 04/11/2009 10:54:18 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Ken, what's the frequency?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner
i agree that this would work but this is just simple not possible in our world. first (considering they are US citizen for example) you would need a permittion from the US to enter US ports armed with this kind of weapons.

That was a lot of words to say that US law is improperly hampering the actions of US citizens. In the old days, merchant ships were most certainly armed. How then is it now not a practical answer?

and even if you would get this you would not be allow you to enter forreign ports with the same weapons. so how do you trade for example lets say china if they don´t allow your ships into their ports because of this.

Oh, darn, I'd had to see trade with China impeded. We might have to start hiring people for jobs again that are worth having.

49 posted on 04/11/2009 10:56:35 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: redlegplanner

BO probably will not let them do that. Those are his sand monkey buddy’s.


50 posted on 04/11/2009 10:59:43 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year military veteran of Navy, Air Force, and Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

I also wonder how “responsible” he would be, or if the owner of the boat is held responsible. He is just the captain and an employee....


if he is the captain he is direct responsible for everthing that might happens on his ship. (law of the sea). if they can prove the company of the guilt too, fine. they will take them to court too. but anyway the captain is the first one who will have to take the responsibility. because as a captain you have several special rights (and of course there for you have several duties). this means as captain you are direct resbonsible for what ever happens on your ship. even if you might didn´t know this will not save you because law says you have to know it. it´s your job.


51 posted on 04/11/2009 11:05:26 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

That was a lot of words to say that US law is improperly hampering the actions of US citizens. In the old days, merchant ships were most certainly armed. How then is it now not a practical answer?


no this have been a lot of words telling that the US law has only jurisdiction in the US. and not for the world. btw. i didn´t say this could not be an answer for the current pirate “problem” i only said this will not happen because of international law. (US has agreed to this too).

you said: Oh, darn, I’d had to see trade with China impeded. We might have to start hiring people for jobs again that are worth having.


again this is your personal observation. and china was just a example (i stated this). you could see this for trade in generall. “we” are in no position to establish a thing like “armed merchant vessels” because of international law right now. so what is the solution? no trade at all?


52 posted on 04/11/2009 11:25:44 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
Fire hoses work really well,

A fire hose is good for boats right along side out to maybe one hundred feet. What do you do about the boat with the RPG gunner when they stand off at several hundred yards and offer to poke a hole in you at the water line?.

Your arguments against arming a "pick-up" crew of assorted nasties is well taken. Small arms are problematical in effectiveness for people insufficient training. So instead of arming the sailors, why not arm the ship?

I would propose to place one or two ISO standard shipping containers with a roll up door similar to those corrugated fire doors in the seaward side of the container, just above deck level on both sides of the deck. I would load each container with a 25 or 30mm chaingun. These automatic cannon can fire single shots, low rate auto fire at 100 rpm, and 200 rpm at high rate. They allow you to switch from high explosive to incendiary rounds with the flip of a switch. The best part is that they are capable of remote control from the bridge thus keeping the crew away from mischief.

The solution I propose would add one or possibly two additional bridge personnel as ordnance officers and maybe not even that if you could use the port & starboard lookouts as remote gunners. The containers would be modular allowing you to swap out your ordnance with minimum fuss and bother for maintenance and repair and perhaps even reload of the container mounted magazines.

Regards,
GtG

53 posted on 04/11/2009 2:13:22 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
hey Travis, just the man I wanted to ask...

what is the coastal range of all these anti gun countries...???

why not simply run small escort craft alongside the cargo ships up to the 'border', or simply offload arms and have long range cover from this perimeter ???

Im sure its a complicated situation for my simple thought...but I cant see any sane sailor floating into this hijack zone unarmed...you couldnt pay me enough...

54 posted on 04/11/2009 3:09:41 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 ("JesusChrist 08"...Trust in the Lord......=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

Well, he’s 73 and he’s been doing this since he was about 24( got out of the Navy), and so far so good. He took a year or two off as a car salesman back during the time they had a luxury tax on boats, but other than that, he’s been a yacht captain.


55 posted on 04/11/2009 6:51:50 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Sounds like it’s time for another unbiased ABC News Gun Special with Diane Sawyer.

They can call it “If I Only Had a Battleship”.


56 posted on 04/11/2009 7:01:06 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (If Hitler used a TelePrompter, we would all be speaking German...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Sure, weapons can be maintained in any environment, by professional soldiers. We are talking about seamen here, most of whom have no weapons training and minimal interest in doing so.

We need to be practical here. The boat owners are not going to pay for guards on board and the sailors are not competent to handle and maintain weapons.

57 posted on 04/11/2009 11:17:58 PM PDT by gandalftb (An appeaser feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
I agree with your thoughts on having an ordnance or weapons officer on board. That can be done with American and a number of European crews that are professionally trained merchant seamen.

Either the captain or first mate would be sufficient to determine the armed resistance. But complicated weapons that have to be maintained in a salty environment would really be problematic. The boat owners are not going to give up any cargo space to weapons.

Sure if the pirates want to use RPG's they will, but it's bad for business to disable or destroy a ship, no payday. Piracy is a business.

Fire hoses can discharge 2,000 GPM easily 300 feet and fill one of those skiffs. What about a smoke screen?

58 posted on 04/11/2009 11:26:30 PM PDT by gandalftb (An appeaser feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

We have evidence that a bunch of semi-savage Somali pirates are able to maintain and use weapons in that environment.


59 posted on 04/12/2009 1:09:47 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Well, making the shipping companies pay for their own protection certainly makes better sense than making the American taxpayer pay for a problem that the U.S. never created in the first place.

The U.S. hasn’t been paying ransoms like the other shipping companies and the countries that they are from, have been doing for years. They are the ones who have created this mess in the first place.

There’s no way the American taxpayer should have to pay for our military to take care of problems created by other countries and their shipping companies. No more *bailouts* and *especially* not for other countries and foreign companies...

So, sure..., make the companies take care of themselves...


60 posted on 04/12/2009 7:22:04 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson