Mass. Republican Party abandoning pro-family conservatism, new chairman tells homosexual newspaper

MassResistance.org ^ | 4/9/2009 | n/a

[massmike]

Newly elected Republican Party Chairman Jennifer Nassour has wasted no time making it clear where she wants the party to go. Last week, in a front-page interview with the hardcore homosexual newspaper Bay Windows, she told the homosexual community that they didn't need to worry about the Republican party opposing them on "social issues" or "the culture wars."

[LoneRangerMassachusetts]

So, basically, there is no longer a Republican Party in Massachusetts, right?

It dissolved during Romney's administration. But so what. Bush pretty much finished breaking the party apart at the national level at the same time.

Who needs them? What we need is a society of middle-class members left who work to produced the wealth and goods we all consume. This society should organize itself not into a party but an organization that controls who gets elected. I'd take a conservative Democrat over a liberal Republican if the values were mostly right. This idea is along the lines of the NRA. They rate some Democrats an A+ on gun control and some Republicans a C. They are having an impact on legislation. If we had a tight-knit society of the middle-class, we would have strength to wage political campaigns against the organized elite (CFR, TLC, BG) and the organized Marxists. As it stands we are divided and conquered.

[GOPsterinMA]

I was told that the clerk in a specific town (I can PM if you want to know) was arbitrarily throwing eligible voter names out on the sign up sheets. Ogonowski decided not to challenge this in court.

[GOPsterinMA]

You got it!

[GOPsterinMA]

Key word is “try”. I think it’s slipped away, along with the rest of NE.

[liberalism is suicide]

Socialist party A or socialist party B, which funeral director should we choose to handle America’s final arrangements? Basically, that’s what Americans are being asked to do. I’d rather see socialism buried, not America.

[Westbrook]

> We should head up to New Hampshire and try to turn it red again.

I live in New Hampshire, and we desperately need your help. There are just over 1 million people living up here, so we should be able to turn the tide, if only we could get enough votes.

The gay activists have been very busy up here and have spent a lot of money. It has paid off big-time for them.

Here is the legislation passed by the NH house in just the last week.

* “Gender-neutral” marriage. If you are a pastor having a commission as a JOP, you must perform the ceremony, regardless of your personal convictions. Public school curricula must be updated to present same-sex marriages on a morally equal basis as traditional marriage. Marriage licenses will no longer say, “Husband” and “Wife”, but “Person A” and “Person B”. The words, “minister of the gospel” have been replaced in the law with “member of the clergy”.

* “Gender-neutral” bathrooms. All public accomodations, which includes bathrooms and locker rooms, must allow “transgendered” people to use whatever “accomodation” satisfies their perverse obsessions. That includes the boys and girls bathrooms in stores, restaurants, public schools and churches.

* Homosexuals and “transgendered” have been added to the Human Rights law, and the human rights law has been further extended to establish a Human Rights Commission with the authority to impose fines of up to $50,000 and unspecified jail time for those who offend homosexuals and hermaphrodites, with no jury trial and no appeal. All decisions will be final.

Nice, huh?

Next up:

* $0.15 increase in the gasoline tax
* 8% inheritance tax
* increases in capital gains taxes
* loyalty oath for home schoolers

[massmike]

Could you send me a link for that info?I am constantly trying to open eyes down here,and I need as much evidence as I can get,and a link to verify helps make my case stronger.Thanks in advance.

[Westbrook]

Here ya go ..

http://www.nhcornerstone.org/

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Trans-gender+rights+bill+passes+House+by+one+vote&articleId=c0687353-74a5-4278-ba46-6c016c2e32a3

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090327/FRONTPAGE/903270359

http://www.hslda.org/Legislation/State/nh/2009/NHHB368/default.asp

http://en.wordpress.com/tag/new-hampshire-human-rights-commission/

[ElectricStrawberry]

Tossing out eligible voters on sign-up sheets is nothing new, but I’m pretty sure he didn’t even turn in the required 10,000....that’s why you get thousands of extra votes.....and why you limit each sheet to ONE voter....and ensure there are no stray marks anywhere on the sheet...no stains, etc....

He only turned in 9,970 signatures (10,000 needed).......when he SHOULD have delivered at least 12,000 to cover any shennanigans.

Think he turned in 30-short and ended up 80-something short.

[Westbrook]

Oh, I forgot the tax issues.

Here you are ...

http://www.eagletribune.com/punewsnh/local_story_078003650.html?keyword=secondarystory

http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2009/04/03/highlights_of_nh_houses_proposed_budget/

What state do you live in?

[massmike]

Thanks.I’m most interested in the Human Rights Commission and the penalities for offending gays and trannies with no trial or appeal.I’m looking through those links but haven’t found anything about that.Perhaps you could point me in the right direction?
Another friend brought up that it doesn’t sound constitutional,(denying due process).Do you have anything with that info specifically?Thanks again.

[Westbrook]

nh cornerstone had the article ...

... let me dig it up ...

[Westbrook]

And while I’m looking that one up, here is one of the cases decided by the NH HRC.

Engjoy ...

http://nhlawblog.com/2008/10/08/400000-verdict-in-work-environment-case/

[massmike]

Thanks.I’m not doubting it.In fact,I remember reading last year in Colorado they signed a similar law and anyone keeping a man out of the ladies room in a public place could face a $5,000 fine and a year in jail.

a clip of the article:On Thursday (May 29), Colorado Governor Bill Ritter, a Democrat, signed a law allowing men to use women’s bathrooms and locker rooms, based on so-called sexual-identity (a man who feels like a woman, wants to be a woman or thinks he is a woman). Under the state’s new “transgender nondiscrimination” law, restaurants and other public accommodations that try to keep guys out of the ladies room are subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and a year in jail. Besides destroying the family, the happy movement (and its pet politicians) are intent on abolishing gender as a legal distinction. That sound heard from Denver is civilization being flushed.

http://www.grasstopsusa.com/df060408.html

[Westbrook]

I can’t find that particular note from CornerstoneNH, but here is the law that establishes the commission.

http://gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXXI/354-A/354-A-5.htm

The Human Rights Commission is a State Level court, much like the NH Supreme Court, that operates ABOVE the county court system.

You will see that there is no state-level appeal process. The accused must take his appeal to Federal Court.

[Westbrook]

> That sound heard from Denver is civilization being flushed.

Yup.

In Tuesday’s debate about the “Bathroom Bill”, as it is affectionately called around here, there were dozens of different “gender identities” listed.

A motion to amend the bill to limit it to municipal and state accomodations was defeated.

The bill passed as written.

By one vote.

Even if it failed, it would have returned next session. The hedonist Left has been trying to get “genderless marriage” and “genderless bathrooms” and “Human Rights Commission” protections for years. They just keep coming back every year, and every year they kept getting closer. This year, they scored a Trifecta.

[mountainbunny]

Mass. Republican Party abandoning pro-family conservatism, new chairman tells homosexual newspaper

The same Massachusetts GOP that gave the world Mitt Romney and his dreamy hair?

Or a different one?

Gee, whiz.

::blink:: ::blink::

I wonder what sort of whacked-out sorta-liberal pseudo-conservative you'd have to be to be successful in the world of Massachusetts politics...?

Disclaimer: I do not actually wonder what sort of whacked-out sort-liberal pseudo-conservative you'd have to be to be successful in the world of Massachusetts politics.

I know the answer, and it is "Mitt Romney".

[SuperLuminal]

"When you command the support of only 12% of the electorate, have no statewide elected officials, no representation in Congress and hold only 10% of the legislative seats, you pretty much have no party."

"..you pretty much have no party" need to emigrate since there is nothing, in your lifetime, that can possibly change the situation.

[ReformationFan]

Since when did the Massachusetts GOP ever contain pro-family conservatism in the first place? The dreadful RINO governor Weld in the 1990s couldn’t shove abortions and homosexuality down everyone’s throat fast enough.

Massachusetts is in bad need of a Jonathan Edwards-style revival.

[andy58-in-nh]

I “emigrated” twelve years ago and never looked back: except to wonder at the depths which a purportedly “free” state could plumb in pursuit of what they perceive as equality.