Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan McCain: What I Learned from the Democrats (Baby RINO barf alert)
The Daily Beast ^ | 4/7/09

Posted on 04/07/2009 11:56:43 AM PDT by lewisglad

The mistakes liberals like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are making can teach Republicans how to regain power—and how to hold onto it.

In recent weeks, I’ve been critical of some of the most hard-core ideological elements of the GOP. As a consequence, some have requested I leave the party altogether, and say that I am now an unwelcome member. Let me be clear: No one wants the Republican Party to succeed more than I do. I spent nearly two years on the road during my father’s presidential campaign, in my early twenties, surrounded by hygienically deficient, middle-aged political strategists traveling on a bus whose bathroom was almost always clogged. I did everything I could possibly think of to help get my father elected president. During that time, I admittedly realized conservatives’ failure to communicate effectively with my generation. But I also completely fell in love with the party, and started to understand why its core ideals better defined me than those of the Democrats. Any criticism I give of the Republican Party is out of love, and as someone who feels knowledgeable and experienced enough to give constructive criticism.

But as harsh as I’ve been about some elements of the GOP, I find aspects of the Democratic Party infinitely worse. Just as I fear the far right would undermine a conservative resurgence, the far left of Obama’s party threatens to do the exact same thing to him and his administration.

It is no secret that the Republican Party, for all its faults, consistently displays party unity. But Democratic leaders seem more concerned with their own personal agendas than supporting President Obama and the future of their party.

It is no secret that the Republican Party, for all its faults, consistently displays party unity. For all the criticism that the Bush administration came in for, risks were taken (like supporting the Iraq troop surge) that wound up benefiting the GOP in the long run. But Democratic leaders such as Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid seem more concerned with their own personal agendas than supporting President Obama and the future of their party. In fact, shortly after Barack Obama was elected president, Senator Reid went so far as to say, “I don’t work for him.” Even after the Democrats’ huge victories in 2006 and 2008, party unity still seems to be in disarray.

Take Afghanistan, for example. Republican leaders, including my father and Bill Kristol, support Obama’s new plan—and moreover, have expressed concern that the liberal House and Senate leadership are so stuck on being antiwar and standing up for leftist values that they are failing to properly inform voters of the issues at hand. Worse, congressional Democrats are threatening Obama’s ability to do his job as president appropriately, and protect the American people. It is all the more ironic that Republicans are supporting Obama and his bipartisan approach while his own party remains wary and doubtful.

I always have believed that in order for our government to successfully function and move forward, it is important for both parties to embrace centrism. Of course, many people voted for Barack Obama because they were hoping he would be an extremely liberal president. Personally, I think he and his advisers are smart enough to understand there’s much to be done in the political center by listening to both sides and learning to compromise. But Obama will not be able to continue this course if his party leaders don’t support him. Just last month, John Avlon made this very point on The Daily Beast in his article, “The Coming Democratic Civil War”: Liberal Democrats threaten to undo Obama’s presidency because of their embrace of partisanship.

Look at Obama’s stimulus bill—as soon as he handed it over to the House, Democrats loaded it with so many appropriations they made it impossible to pass. In his article “Why the Democrats Can’t Govern” in this week's New Republic, Jonathan Chait writes that “the stimulus served as a mere precursor to the major battle over Obama's budget.” (He goes on to cite Sen. Kent Conrad’s endorsement of farm payments and Democrats' opposition to Obama’s plan to limit tax deductions for the rich.) Now, I may not agree with Obama either, but if such a left-leaning magazine so blatantly recognizes the writing on the wall when it comes to extreme members of the Democratic Party hijacking message and power, then it is obviously a major concern.

This is less about Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi than about party infighting. If Republicans are going to gain power again, and more importantly, remain in power, we must recognize the value of centrism—instead of turning to extreme right-wing members of the party like Rush Limbaugh (which I have made clear I think is a dangerous thing for the party to do). That the Democrats find themselves with the same problem while they’re in power only highlights my point. We must get the right people in power to win the next election cycle, and the one after that. If the Democrats don’t figure it out, they will inevitably find themselves in the minority again. The question remains: Can politics ever become truly centrist and bipartisan?

Meghan McCain is originally from Phoenix. She graduated from Columbia University in 2007. She previously wrote for Newsweek magazine


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; airhead; bipartisan; bipartisanship; democrats; harryreid; idiot; kristol; limbaugh; mcbama; mccain; mccaintruthfile; mcqueeg; meghanmccain; meghanmcinsane; mmccain; obama; pelosi; rino; rinoalert; rinoette; rinoparty; rush; stimulus; talkradio; trojanhorse; waronrush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: rabscuttle385

“...the value of centrism...” Yeah, honey. That worked out real well for daddy, didn’t it. Betray and ridicule conservatives and bend over deeply, hoping leftists will support you. SHREWD!!


21 posted on 04/07/2009 12:22:27 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Just like her daddy! Insult your own kind, then let them brew it it for a bit, then insult the other side to win your own kind back.

Hey Meagan! You are not in control of my principles. Piss off!


22 posted on 04/07/2009 12:25:43 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I want to thank everyone here on behalf of ‘the daily beast’ for generating so much traffic and revenue for them by paying attention to this absurd cow.


23 posted on 04/07/2009 12:33:07 PM PDT by mbraynard (You are the Republican Party. See you at the precinct meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

So you ride on the bus with a losing candidate and we should listen to your advice?

I will say this, whatever publicist Daddy hired for Meagan is certainly earning her pay. This “deep thinker” is everywhere.

I hate to pull age on her, but I’ve been following politics longer than she has been alive. Republicans rarely win when they play down the middle, unless the Democrats run a real donkey. And with the onslaught of radical socialist ideas pushed by Obama and his party, now is NOT the time to start compromising!

The winning strategy is lower taxes, smaller government and more freedom.


24 posted on 04/07/2009 12:34:15 PM PDT by Kandy Atz ("Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want for bread.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
I always have believed that in order for our government to successfully function and move forward, it is important for both parties to embrace centrism.

Centrism - Huh...

partisanship is like two sailors at the helm of the Titanic, one wanting to swerve port to avoid an iceberg, one wanting to swerve to starboard away from it, constantly arguing while doing nothing. It's wrong!

centrism is like having the captain hearing the bickering and declaring "To heck with your arguing - I am taking the helm. You say port. The other says starboard. I am splitting the difference. WE GO STRAIGHT AHEAD."

... I'd like to know what principles are wrapped up in 'centrism' other than splitting the difference between good and bad and getting mush. Is 'centrism' now 1/2 of a $2 trillion deficit? 1/2 the number of abortions? Where do we compromise?

25 posted on 04/07/2009 12:40:28 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Meghan McCain: What you think, what you ‘FEEL’, is so totally irrelevant to the literal daily lives of this ‘great’ nation. GO AWAY
26 posted on 04/07/2009 12:42:29 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Bama and Company are reenacting the Pharaoh as told by Moses in Genesis!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Headline makes sense since obviously her father didn’t have much to teach her.


27 posted on 04/07/2009 12:44:46 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Retort: Rush Limbaugh is a centrist.


28 posted on 04/07/2009 12:45:29 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: avacado

She insulted the people working to get her dad elected too. Pretty tacky. Hey Meghan, maybe your old man should have shelled out the dough for a better bus and toilet facilities. I sure his campaign workers would have appreciated it.


29 posted on 04/07/2009 12:47:45 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

and just who anointed ms mccain the voice of anything? She’s a limelight seeker, nothing more, nothing less. Like her father, she’s all over the map, and another apologist. she needs to go out and earn some props on her own, and not leech off daddys name.


30 posted on 04/07/2009 12:51:35 PM PDT by rebellious49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
“I spent nearly two years on the road during my father’s presidential campaign, in my early twenties, surrounded by hygienically deficient, middle-aged political strategists traveling on a bus whose bathroom was almost always clogged.”

And were supposed to believe that Meghan's porky ass was not a major contributor to the turd volcano in the crapper?

31 posted on 04/07/2009 12:55:15 PM PDT by mickey finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

and just who anointed ms mccain the voice of anything? She’s a limelight seeker, nothing more, nothing less. Like her father, she’s all over the map, and another apologist. she needs to go out and earn some props on her own, and not leech off daddys name.


32 posted on 04/07/2009 12:55:29 PM PDT by rebellious49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

The family is loaded. Her grandpa owned a big Budweiser distributorship in phoenix. I wonder if they also resold Corona aka why Juan McCain is for amnesty.

Shut up fat spoiled Meghan. I guess that Columbia journalism degreee will help at Burger King when all the newspapers are dead.


33 posted on 04/07/2009 12:59:24 PM PDT by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
But Democratic leaders seem more concerned with their own personal agendas than supporting President Obama and the future of their party.

Sounds like little Meghan is concerned about Obama's agenda not getting the support she thinks it needs from the democrat leadership.

When someone worries more about the opposition's agenda not getting the support it needs, then that someone is of the same mindset as the person with the unsupported agenda. Little Meghan is not one of us.

More proof that she's definitely not of us: She doesn't understand at all why most republicans support Rush.

Meghan, it's time that you go away. We would rather lose with our principles than to compromise them by becoming democrat-light, like you definitely have proven to be. You don't belong with the republicans since you clearly don't think like one.
34 posted on 04/07/2009 1:05:02 PM PDT by adorno (Where is Branch 4?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

There was talk about boycotting RINO propaganda. What happened here?


35 posted on 04/07/2009 1:29:03 PM PDT by gorilla_warrior (Liberalism is a hate crime that can no longer be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
"It is no secret that the Republican Party, for all its faults, consistently displays party unity. But Democratic leaders seem more concerned with their own personal agendas than supporting President Obama and the future of their party."

Yes dear, the Republicans always have party unity!! That's why so many of them keep rolling over for the RATS - kind of the way your dad does.

The RATS, on the other hand could have one of their own commit some of the lowest deeds, and that, in turn, qualifies them for elevation in the democrat party.

What makes you think that you go to bed one night and dream that the 'tooth fairy' waved her wand and you woke up so intelligent that we give a damn what you think??

36 posted on 04/07/2009 1:30:20 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
In recent weeks, I’ve been critical of some of the most hard-core ideological elements of the GOP. As a consequence, some have requested I leave the party altogether, and say that I am now an unwelcome member. Let me be clear: No one wants the Republican Party to succeed more than I do.

Two-plus-two doesn't equals five. You like what Harry and Nancy down at the other end of the political spectrum bring, then I say go hitch wagons with that bunch.

Get a clue, Harry and Nancy don't want to get along with you or your dad.  There is a country to be saved, and you are more interested in going around apologizing and making peace with the enemies of this country, just like Obama.  You failed the first time around, and you failed now.

FTW, shut your pie-hole and get lost.

37 posted on 04/07/2009 2:11:07 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gigster

Yes, I had the same thought. Way to keep it classy, Meghan. Nice slap at some other people who worked their you-know-what off trying to get your father elected. Funny to see her proclamations about party unity when she, like her father, doesn’t hesitate to slam the party when it serves her agenda.


38 posted on 04/07/2009 2:21:52 PM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Can politics ever become truly centrist and bipartisan?

Because one-party rule is what we all desire. /s

Sheesh! Can this girl be any more ideologically vacuous? She is a danger to the Republic.

39 posted on 04/07/2009 3:52:34 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne; wagglebee; TAdams8591; Fiddlstix; Ol' Sparky; Zechariah_8_13; BnBlFlag; notaliberal; ...

"If Republicans are going to gain power again, and more importantly, remain in power, we must recognize the value of centrism—instead of turning to extreme right-wing members of the party like Rush Limbaugh..." —Meghan McCain, 2009-04-07

The RINO Party Alert.

Just say no to liberals, turncoats, and traitors!

We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals of our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all.
— President Ronald Wilson Reagan


NO! to on-demand abortion.
NO! to homosexual marriage.
NO! to amnesty for illegals.
NO! to gun control.
NO! to affirmative action.
NO! socialized healthcare.

NO! to more spending.
NO! to more taxes.
NO! to bailouts and pork.
NO!to homosexuals in the military.
NO! to carbon credits.
NO! to the Socialist agenda.


FR Keywords: rinoparty, rinoalert, rino

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail DirtyHarryY2K with the subject line add rinoalert.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop rinoalert.)


40 posted on 04/07/2009 4:32:10 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson