Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Iron River" of guns into Mexico is actually a trickle
Denver Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 2 April, 2009 | Dan BidstrupGo to Dan's Home Page

Posted on 04/03/2009 6:38:40 AM PDT by marktwain

Al Gore tells us "Facts are stubborn things." How true. The assertion that 90% of the guns confiscated in Mexico come from the US has been debunked, yet the anti-gun crowd has scarcely missed a beat. The guns are traced by serial numbers given to the BATF by the Mexican government. It seems that only a small fraction of the guns confiscated have serial numbers since international arms manufacturers don't bother with such niceties. Of them, a fair number come from the US.

The true automatic weapons and heavier weapons didn't come from the US gun market. They came from the Mexican military or international arms trade.

Tom Diaz is a senior policy analyst at the Violence Policy Center. He shrugged off the error and said "Let's do what we can with what we know. We know that one hell of a lot of firearms come from the United States because our gun market is wide open."

In other words, even though their main reason just got kicked out from under them, they still want to close down gun purchases in this country.

They still want to re-enact the "Assault Weapons" ban that lapsed in 2004. The fact that law abiding citizens can buy guns legally in the US just seems to bug the heck out of these folks. Let's see if any of the gun control sites revise their reports from the last two months in light of the recent revelations.

In my last post, I suggested that Mexico might consider making gun ownership legal in their country like it is in the United States. How would this affect the country? The murder rate in Mexico as a whole is about 10.2 murders per 100,000 people, based on data from the Mexican government for 2007. That compares to 5.6 murders per 100,000 people in the US as a whole for the same year, according to the FBI. To me, this says that a country with something like 6,000 legal guns for 110 million people would benefit from some up close and personal protection. I know that comparisons across socio-economic and cultural variables is sloppy science, but we are comparing a body of 110 million people under one set of rules, and 300 million under another set of rules. That will average out a lot of other variables. Personal guns have a huge bearing on murder as has been proven by research by John Lott over more than 13 years of data in the US.

The only reason I can see for reluctance to adopt this policy change in the Mexican government is that any government wants to feel secure, and an armed citizenry makes governments feel less secure.

Happy citizens defend their government because they see its value. Unhappy citizens who are unarmed, can't do much but vote for the designated candidate and hope for the best. There is no way for the unarmed population to make any changes if democracy fails. Armed revolt is the ultimate failing grade for a government. Does anybody out there have an example of a government, once established, choosing to arm its previously un-armed citizens? I think not.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; aliens; banglist; guncontrol; guns; immigration; lie; mexico; mythof90percent; narcoterror
This should be a major scandal, but it is just shrugged off. There should be a retraction in the NY Times, and all the other MSM. Where is it?
1 posted on 04/03/2009 6:38:40 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If we had secure boarders, this wouldn’t even be an issue. Secure the boarders to solve this and many other problems.


2 posted on 04/03/2009 6:41:39 AM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

Securing our borders would certainly lessen the problems a great deal. There will always be smuggling but we could easily knock it back by 80 or 90 percent. It would probably solve many of mexico’s problems as well.


3 posted on 04/03/2009 6:44:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

You and I Can’t Buy the Guns Mexican Cartels Own
The Administration is Not Dealing Straight With Us on Mexico’s Gun Problem

Ralph Weller
March 1 2009

Let’s set things straight right up front. Yes, some guns are being smuggled into Mexico from the U.S. Most are handguns. But, handguns are being illegally trafficked from state to state and from the U.S. to Canada. It should come as no surprise that guns are smuggled into Mexico. But, the problem being portrayed by the U.S. media and our government is not as it seems. You see, Mexico doesn’t allow ownership of most firearms, so ordinary Mexican people seeking self-protection will find a way to get them into Mexico. As for the drug cartels operating in the border towns along the U.S., they have other sources for their weapons and have become the prime supplier within Mexico.

I worked in Mexico in a border town for about five years. It was far enough from San Diego County in the Sonora Desert of Mexico that commuting several hundred miles daily was impossible. So, for a few years I lived in the city and commuted home periodically on some weekends. As crime grew out of control, I eventually moved into a place on the U.S. side and commuted daily in and out of Mexico for my own safety.

I stayed in Mexico for a Mexican holiday my first year. I don’t recall the holiday. Normally, I would leave Mexico for a holiday, but it was in the middle of the week and one day was not long enough to come home. All I know is that on that particular Mexican holiday, Mexicans love to fire guns into the air. That evening as I sat on the balcony of my hotel, the gun fire that erupted in celebration was quite unbelievable. It was so intense I backed off the balcony and watched the festivities from a couple three feet in the room. We’re talking war-like firing of weapons, it was that intense.

As I listened that night to the gun fire, I was somewhat shocked at the amount of fully automatic gun fire. It wasn’t sporadic. It was continuous throughout the city. For a country that bans guns I thought, how in the world did they get their hands on all these full-auto weapons? Clearly what sounded like M16 fire was prolific along with 7.62 x 39 AK autos with a smattering of smaller caliber full-autos, most likely 9mm. Gun fire can be heard in most American cities on New Years, but I’ve never heard full-auto weapons being fired, at least not in the San Diego area.

The next day I went into work and sat down with a trusted senior Mexican manager. I looked at him and said, “I thought guns were illegal in Mexico.” He chuckled and said, “So you stayed in town last night?” As the conversation progressed, it became clear that guns are as common in Mexico as tamales at Christmas. Everyone he knows, including himself, own at least one gun. And, it matters not whether it’s a semi-auto or fully automatic, they’re all illegal, so why stop with semi-autos? Though clearly illegal in the states in most instances, a lot of Mexicans have more firepower in terms of military weapons than we can only dream of owning here.

As time went on, parties in the city at middle class Mexican homes become a way of life. Most Mexican managers in the plant knew I was a gun wonk. As it turns out, they couldn’t wait to invite me over to their place on a Friday night to show me their collection. Semi-autos, some very high-end Sigs and other European handguns were not uncommon along with piles of old revolvers. I thought I had seen everything in the states, but in Mexico it’s not uncommon for people to own full-auto military rifles. Everything from an M16, UZI machine pistols and the most popular, select-fire AK47 military rifles. These are not the so-called “assault weapons” you can buy at the local gun shop in the U.S., but full select-fire military-issue rifles. Now, I know you want to know and are dying to ask; Did I see any U.S. military-issue weapons stolen from the U.S. military? Not a single one was marked with U.S. military markings. Everything was marked with additional foreign markings on the receiver, including M16 rifles, or they had nothing at all. I saw firearms manufactured in Europe, China, Russia and South America along with U.S. manufactured weapons. I saw rifles that looked familiar with no place of manufacture, no serial number or manufacturer’s logo. The information was not removed, it was never there to begin with. I can only assume they came from illegal arms manufacturers in India or Pakistan that produce copies of weapons. It was obvious that none of these firearms came from a U.S. gun shop in Tucson or San Diego. You couldn’t buy them from a gun shop in the states if you tried.

It seems Mexicans have a rich heritage of firearms ownership prior to the ban in 1968. Despite the laws against owning them, they ignore it. Most Mexicans will say they need it for personal protection of themselves and their family. The other reason is they don’t trust the government or local law enforcement. If they have to use it in their home for self-defense, whether they end up in jail is all dependent on how much money they can come up with, or who they know in the government. It also depends on who they shoot. But, given the alternative with high crime rates, most middle class Mexicans willingly and without reservations take the risk. Despite being able to own .22 caliber pistols or rifles, Mexican law requires them to be stored at an approved firing range. Where’s the firing range I asked many times? No one knew of one. Where’s the gun stores in town to buy legal guns? Gun stores? No one ever recalled seeing one anywhere in Mexico, let alone their city. I’m sure somewhere, maybe in Mexico City you might be able to buy a gun, but not in this city of almost 1.5 million residents. And the gun traffickers know it.

Where do ordinary Mexicans get their weapons? Most buy them from a ‘friend’ or a friend of a friend or cousin or uncle. Where the friend gets them is not talked about. But, it seems that drug cartels in Mexico are heavily involved in gun trafficking of military weapons and related hardware. And, who are these ordinary Mexicans? They range from people who work in factories as managers and senior managers, government workers, doctors, dentists and anyone with the financial means to buy a firearm. I even ran into a couple of government bureaucrats, one a lawyer for the federal government who owns firearms. He confirmed that people he knew in the government, some very highly ranked bureaucrats and politicians all own illegal firearms. The other works for the Mexican equivalent of the IRS. It’s a way of life in Mexico. It seemed to me that you aren’t in the ‘in-crowd’ in Mexico unless you own at least one firearm. I was amazed at the whole thing after believing for years that gun ownership in Mexico was non-existent. That is hardly the case.

All this flies in the face of news articles published by the U.S. media in the last week or two. Mexico’s gun problems are a direct result of gun runners buying “assault weapons” in the U.S. and taking them into Mexico to arm drug cartels, says the U.S. media and government. That is a bunch of government and media nonsense. The cartels aren’t arming themselves from U.S. gun stores with semi-auto AR15 and AK47 rifles. They’ve moved on up. Not to completely dismiss arms moving into Mexico from the U.S., but it is not as it seems when the U.S. media tells the story. The firearms moving across the border are semi-auto rifles and handguns sold to middle class or wealthy Mexicans seeking personal protection from criminals that have no connections in Mexico with gun runners. For the most part the wealthy in Mexico are targets of criminal elements, so they have no intention of connecting up with them to buy a self-defense firearm. You’re better off buying a weapon from someone within the Mexican government than buying it from the criminal element, namely a drug cartel.

Cartels buy their arms from countries around the world, most any place where military weapons can be purchased on the black market, or from countries wishing to destabilize North America. They arm themselves from a worldwide black market of full auto military weapons including grenades, land mines and RPGs. They also “procure” their weapons from the less than savory from within the Mexican military.

The drug cartels can easily afford to fly their weaponry into Mexico using their own fleet of aircraft on to remote airfields, or land them on remote Mexican shores from their fleet of vessels. They do it with drugs all of the time. Drug cartels buying semi-auto AR15 or AK rifles from U.S. gun dealers is viewed as a joke by Mexico’s drug cartel, most Mexicans, and unfortunately by the Mexican government. The only people fooled by all the political rhetoric are Americans listening to the likes of Attorney General Eric Holder and other anti-gun politicians.

Mexico has a gun problem, just like they have a drug problem and both the U.S. and Mexican governments are trying to place the blame on U.S. gun owners. U.S. gun owners aren’t the problem. Mexico is the problem. The government is corrupt from the lowest level law enforcement officer shaking down American tourists for traffic violations, to officials and politicians highly placed within the Mexican government, including elements within the military. Everyone knows it. Everyone in Mexico knows it. Every law enforcement official in the U.S. knows it, and everyone in our government knows it. And anyone who has worked for any length of time within border cities and lived in the local community knows it. This is taking a Mexican problem, blaming the U.S. by turning it into a crisis in order further an agenda, and Eric Holder and President Obama knows it and they are taking advantage of it.

The next time you see a news report of illegal full-auto weapons and grenades being found here in the U.S., you know where they came from. It wasn’t from a gun store in Tucson or Phoenix. The administration is right that gun trafficking along the U.S./Mexico border is a problem. Not only do we have drugs and illegal aliens coming in our southern border, but we also have military arms and explosives coming into our country illegally as well. That’s the issue and our government is being disingenuous in its argument.

This AP news report published today is typical of what is going on. It is disgustingly biased and flat wrong: AP report for Detroit Free Press

Don’t believe me and what I say? See what the Latin American Herald is saying about a recent arrest of cartel members and their weaponry in Mexico. No, the items listed weren’t purchased at a gun store in Phoenix or Tucson. Grenades and RPGs are illegal in the U.S.: LAH Story


4 posted on 04/03/2009 6:49:07 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Why would mexican drug gangs pay over $2000 for a semi-automatic AK-47 from am American gun dealer when they can get a fully auto one from a Chinese company for $400?


5 posted on 04/03/2009 6:50:16 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
We estimate that 170,000 Mexicans have deserted from their Army over the last ten years, most took their weapons with them.

Many active duty Mexican Army soldiers are selling weapons to the cartels.

Many weapons are being brought in from Cuba to the Cancun area.

Bringing any weapons in from the US us just plain nonsense when they can get them far cheaper and easier elsewhere.

This is another bogus blame-America story.

6 posted on 04/03/2009 7:38:24 AM PDT by gandalftb (An appeaser feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

. The assertion that 90% of the guns confiscated in Mexico come from the US,PURE msm bullsheit ICE and ATF state that only 17% of the guns are from the U.S. msm helping obama’s gun grab.


7 posted on 04/03/2009 9:34:06 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

...like usual it seems that Congress/Government wants to punish its own Citizens for its own actions...


8 posted on 04/03/2009 4:12:07 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...

Ping!


9 posted on 04/03/2009 5:14:40 PM PDT by HiJinx (~ Support Our Troops ~ www.AmericaSupportsYou.mil ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The liars in the press want to help Rahm Emmanuel and his Puppeteer in the White House who do not let any crisis go unexploited.

The Mexican Government will never allow gun rights for citizens there. Mexico is a social and cultural tinderbox created by the historical dominance of a small clique of ruling Euro-elites over a vast underclass of Indian and mestizo peons. Allowing them to have weapons will only create another revolution in a Country where revolutions have been a way of life.

The ruling classes there would rather export their racial and class problems to their wealthier neighbor to the North and the fool who was in office before this fool, as well as the current fool, have done nothing to stop this. On the contrary, they have encouraged and abetted it.

10 posted on 04/03/2009 8:04:05 PM PDT by ZULU (Obamanation of Desolation is President. Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The only reason I can see for reluctance to adopt this policy change in the Mexican government is that any government wants to feel secure, and an armed citizenry makes governments feel less secure.

And this is precisely why the dems want to disarm Americans. People, like Holder, who said only militias had the right to own guns, are stupid or lying. Anyone with any common sense can put 2 and 2 together and know it's not the case. If after the Revolution our founders didn't take away guns, and after the Whiskey Rebellion they didn't take away guns, that should be very clear that they thought individuals had a right to keep guns. I wish someone would ask Holder if he felt stupid when the Supreme Court said he was WRONG.

11 posted on 04/03/2009 10:18:53 PM PDT by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson