Posted on 04/03/2009 6:21:19 AM PDT by chessplayer
For The New York Times economic scene section for March 31, David Leonhardt came across with one of the most amazing admissions about Obama that I've ever seen in the Times. Namely that Barack Obama is just like Hitler. Now, many of you may be solemnly shaking your head in agreement, but in so doing you would be missing why the Times was comparing Obama to Hitler. You see, Leonhardt didn't mean it as an insult. He was saying that it was a good thing that Barack was being like Hitler at least in an economic sense.
It’s interesting that he and the left strongly deny that they are socialists...
I guess they’re right, they aren’t socialists as much as they are fascists.
they are “National Socialists”
language and nuances make such a difference
Whoa. Think I’ll sleep with my shoes on. My family survives by being nimble. There are two family members left in Germany.
Family Motto: He who fights and runs away, lives to fight another day.
Actually, I now see a distinction between National Socialists (Nazis) and generic fascists.
The left calls conservatives “nazis” because of our pride in country and tradition,
and we see them as nazis because of their collectivism.
So, I assert that the left are FASCISTS, but not Nazis, as they have no “national” element to their socialism.
Remember the Nazi party was made up of artists, poets, writers, playwrights, architects, etc. Sound like any party you know?
Hitler did like the idea of cloning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.