Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ted Stevens scandal
The Wall Street Journal ^ | April 2, 2009 | Editorial

Posted on 04/01/2009 8:30:47 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative

Last fall, the senior Senator from Alaska was the poster octogenarian for political corruption. As of yesterday, Ted Stevens is merely another casualty of abusive prosecutors out to make a name for themselves.

The Justice Department yesterday moved to set aside an October conviction on ethics charges and forgo any future trials for Senator Stevens. He walks free, in other words, an innocent man. In the motion, Justice said it "recently discovered" that prosecutors withheld from the defense notes about an interview last April with the state's star witness, Bill Allen, that contradicted his subsequent testimony. Under the Brady Rule for evidence, Justice was obliged to share that with Senator Stevens's lawyers.

This was one of many prosecutorial missteps that came to light after Mr. Stevens was found guilty less than two weeks before Election Day. The Republican narrowly lost his bid for a seventh term. Attorney General Eric Holder yesterday promised a "thorough" probe into the conduct of prosecutors, which is the least the Department owes Mr. Stevens. The Obama Administration made the political calculation here to walk away from the original mistake made by Bush Justice rather than further embarrass the Department in post-trial hearings.

Recall the Stevens indictment was unveiled in July, on the eve of his primary. Announced by the acting head of Justice's Criminal Division, Bush-appointee Matthew Friedrich, the decision violated Department guidelines that prosecutors should avoid becoming players in elections. The charge was that the Senator failed to disclose that an Alaskan oil services company, Veco Corp., paid for renovation work on his chalet -- in essence, that he had lied on official forms. The Government never alleged, much less proved, the far more serious claim that Veco got anything in return from the Senator.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 110th; alaska; corruption; markbegich; stevens; tedstevens; the2008coup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 04/01/2009 8:30:47 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Even if the corrupt prosecutor goes to jail, which is extremely doubtful, how does Stevens get his good name and senate seat back?
2 posted on 04/01/2009 8:34:23 PM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Hey, this is just a distraction. We’ve gotta move on and do something about our more than large carbon footprint.


3 posted on 04/01/2009 8:34:27 PM PDT by Bertha Fanation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

The justice and state departments are rivaled only by MSNBC in their Democratic party activism, no matter who the president is.


4 posted on 04/01/2009 8:35:45 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Like former Secretary Donovan who was hounded from office during the Reagan Administration over a scandal that turned out not to be true, Stevens is left to wander the halls asking the media “Where do I go to clear my good name?”.

Of course, no one will answer. The Democrat hit squad will have done their job and care not a lick that a life and a good name were sacrificed. He was inconvenient to them.


5 posted on 04/01/2009 8:36:15 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (YES WE CAN have a Depression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

The real story is that honest elected officials are the most endangered species on the planet


6 posted on 04/01/2009 8:37:02 PM PDT by wafflehouse (RE-ELECT NO ONE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Boy, are the people in Alaska going to be P*ssed at this.

They were really played for fools by the *Justice* department and the MSM.

7 posted on 04/01/2009 8:38:14 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

They got their senate seat and their extra vote for Harry Reid. Now that that objective has been met, I guess they can let 85 yr old ‘Uncle Ted’ go free. Move along, nothing to see here.

Sorry about that, Ted!


8 posted on 04/01/2009 8:38:46 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

One by one. There is a pattern.
Who has been in charge of taking down members of the GOP?


9 posted on 04/01/2009 8:39:36 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

His name will be cleared in Alaska due to this, most likely. He had near mythical standing in that state.

His senate seat is firmly in the hands of Harry Reid at this point though, and that was the objective of the investigation. The Dems got what they wanted out of this deal - they don’t really care what happens to Ted after they grab his senate seat.


10 posted on 04/01/2009 8:41:02 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I’m guess David Axelrod & Rahm Emanuel amongst others.


11 posted on 04/01/2009 8:42:04 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

What good name? An inept or corrupt prosecutor has nothing do to with guilt or innocence. As far as I’m concerned he was/is guilty as sin, an embarassment even to RINOs and good riddance. Just having an R behind your name doesn’t mean much - as we have seen.


12 posted on 04/01/2009 8:42:18 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I do not doubt it, going back to Tom DeLay at least. I need to do a bit of research and see who lost a seats and how many of those losses were influenced by election season scandals.


13 posted on 04/01/2009 8:53:13 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I do not doubt it, going back to Tom DeLay at least. I need to do a bit of research and see who lost a seats and how many of those losses were influenced by election season scandals.


14 posted on 04/01/2009 8:53:13 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Whenever the Dems gain control (2006) they initiate these bogus prosecutions to scandalize Republicans. After the election the charges are dropped for one reason or another but by that time the Dems have already taken the seat. These scumbags must be brought to justice.
15 posted on 04/01/2009 9:01:34 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Just like Tom Delay. No charges were ever filed against Tom Delay, but of course he “embodied the culture of corruption”. They criminalize politics like no other.


16 posted on 04/01/2009 9:05:13 PM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Stevens got home improvements at no cost from a contractor. Obama got home value at no cost from Rezko..the cases are the same. They couldn’t afford for Stevens to go to jail. Neither case coud they prove that Stevens or Obama supplied anything in return.


17 posted on 04/01/2009 9:17:13 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
An inept or corrupt prosecutor has nothing do to with guilt or innocence

If you really believe this, you obviously have no familiarity with criminal prosecution.

18 posted on 04/01/2009 9:27:56 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
His senate seat is firmly in the hands of Harry Reid at this point. I don't know how his senate seat can be an issue, as Begich won the election. That, after all, was the whole point of the drill, right?
19 posted on 04/01/2009 9:55:01 PM PDT by ArmyTeach ("Significant problems we face can not be solved by the same level of thinking that created them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
I knew all along Ted was not guilty. Anybody with half a brain could look at the facts of the case and reach that same conclusion.

The Democrats set out to steal his seat and convinced enough idiots.

Now we are stuck with Sen Baggage.

The funny thing is; I had made up my mind to back his opposition in the primary. I think he is too old and has become too liberal.

After this obviously partisan attack,fair play forced me to campaign fo rStevens.

You might not like his politics, but you can not question his honesty.

20 posted on 04/01/2009 9:56:48 PM PDT by snowtigger (It ain't what you shoot, it's what you hit...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson