Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Inmates at Guantánamo Pose a Dilemma
New York Times ^ | April 1, 2009 | WM GLABERSON and Ms. WILLIAMS

Posted on 04/01/2009 8:01:36 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim

The dilemma has taken on new urgency because the plan to close the prison depends on other countries’ accepting some of the remaining 241 detainees Diplomats say that with President Obama embarking on Tuesday on a European trip, the effort could falter unless this country signals it is willing to take some of the Guantánamo prisoners.

At home, though, Mr. Obama faces the prospect of a storm of protest from some quarters if he admits detainees the Bush administration labeled terrorists and barred from this country. Already, word of the men’s possible release has brought denunciations and anxiety from military groups, families of Sept. 11 victims and political figures.

“I don’t think people want people that could potentially be terrorists in the United States,” said Representative J. Randy Forbes, Republican of Virginia.

There were signs on Tuesday that the decision-making process was accelerating [emphasis added mine]. Administration officials were in Guantánamo interviewing the 17 men to assess their suitability for release, perhaps in the United States, one official said.

But a detailed review of thousands of pages of documents suggests that definitive answers about who the 17 Uighurs really are will be hard to find. The public record, including intelligence and other materials from court cases and military hearings, often presents a hazy picture [emphasis added mine].

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: andymccarthy; gimto; guantanamo; guantnamo; islam; islamists; nro; obama; realidact; ruleoflaw; september11; terror; terrorists; uighurs; wot
That's strange. A glance at the record on my cell phone shows that on March 19, 2009, I spent 19 minutes and 44 seconds on the phone with the Times' William Glaberson.

In answer to his first question about the possibility the Obama admistration might release the 17 Uighurs free inside the United States, I cited Section 103 of the Real ID Act of 2005. Twice more I stressed it.

Yet there is no mention of the Real ID Act anywhere in Mr. Glaberson's "news" report. I guess he just lumped me in with the other unnamed who, "... brought denunciations and anxiety from ... families of Sept. 11 victims."

Stranger still, Mr. Glaberson must not the newspaper he writes for. Yesterday, Andrew McCarthy, in the New York Times, wrote in part this as the only conservative voice in a 5-way debate:

In fact, the federal REAL ID Act of 2005 provides for the exclusion of any alien who has received terrorist training or has belonged to an organization that promotes terrorism — against anyone. The Uighurs are excludable on both grounds, even if one accepts, for argument’s sake, that they were trained for the purpose of conducting operations against China.

Now, for the purpose of resettling this group, Mr. Obama may ignore statutory provisions — measures enacted precisely because paramilitary training has been a feature of virtually all attacks carried out by radical Islam against the U.S.

Clearly, we cannot send the Uighurs to China; our treaty obligations forbid transfer to countries where detainees are likely to be persecuted. Consequently, they should be detained until another country willing to receive them can be found. Relocating them in the U.S. would be irresponsible and fly in the face of the law.


1 posted on 04/01/2009 8:01:37 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim
Confucius say: Man from Gitmo need to get place to go.
2 posted on 04/01/2009 8:03:46 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

Antarctica has expressed no reservations about taking them.


3 posted on 04/01/2009 8:06:26 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Just Lori; TheForceOfOne; SilvieWaldorfMD; Tennessee Nana; ThreePuttinDude; eastsider; del4hope; ..

Ping!

Please make sure you also read comment # 1.


4 posted on 04/01/2009 8:10:39 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

Shoot them.


5 posted on 04/01/2009 8:11:24 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (What did Obama's Teleprompter know, and when did it know it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim
Antarctica has expressed no reservations about taking them.

Confucius say: Man with no reservation get cold Chinese

6 posted on 04/01/2009 8:14:10 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

Send them to Chinatown in SF.


7 posted on 04/01/2009 8:17:40 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ( Obama, you're off the island!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

I say send them to a lovely Muslim garden-spot, such as Yemen or Somalia, for instance, where they will be cared for appropriately by their fellow Islamists. Perhaps the Saudis would take them in. If the BOs try to bring them here, I would happily participate in a class action lawsuit to challenge such a decision to defy the Real ID Act.


8 posted on 04/01/2009 8:22:59 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

A C17 takes off from Gitmo loaded with all remaining prisoners.

Said C17 lands at Lajes Field 4 hours later empty.

They tried to escape at 35,000 feet.


9 posted on 04/01/2009 9:34:52 AM PDT by hattend (Sarah Palin has run a fishing business, a city, and a state. All Obama has done is run his mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

And while we’re talking about REAL ID, what’s 0bama’s Real I.D. ?


10 posted on 04/01/2009 10:09:49 AM PDT by happygrl (BORG: Barack 0bama Resistance Group: we will not be assimilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

Send them back to China, so they can help beta-test the new “execution vans”.


11 posted on 04/01/2009 11:48:23 AM PDT by montag813 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

For once, I will agree...

Send em to China. They will take care of the problem.


12 posted on 04/01/2009 12:17:42 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Maybe we should find an island and put them there and learn how the Chinese perform interrogations.


13 posted on 04/01/2009 1:41:09 PM PDT by Niuhuru (Fine, here's my gun, but let me give you the bullets first. I'll send them to you through the barrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sergeant Tim

Thanks. Interesting.


14 posted on 04/01/2009 6:31:18 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson