Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steele Weighs In [on Tedisco-Murphy Race in NY]
Ny Daily News ^ | 04/01/09 | Elizabeth Benjamin

Posted on 04/01/2009 6:25:40 AM PDT by freespirited

 
 

RNC Chairman Michael Steele, who was the first to elevate the 20th CD race to a contest of national importance by declaring it a must-win for the Republican Party, just issued the following statement on last night's cliffhanger:

"With over 5,000 absentee and military ballots still left to count, this race is far from over. We are confident that the Republican advantage in these absentee and military ballots can put Jim Tedisco over the top, and the Republican Party will do everything in its power to make sure all lawful votes are counted.”


”We are proud of Jim Tedisco and his campaign. Together, and in partnership with the Tedisco campaign, the New York Republican Party, the Republican National Committee and National Republican Congressional Committee went toe-to-toe with the Obama Democratic machine that looked invincible in the Northeast just a few months ago and showed that our party can and will be competitive in areas of the country where our party hasn’t won recently.”

“President Obama, Senator Clinton, Eliot Spitzer and Chuck Schumer all won this district, and a Democrat won the last two congressional races. The fact we are in a dead heat race in NY-20 means we are making progress as a Party standing firm for fiscal responsibility.”

Despite his positive talk, it's hard to see how Steele, who is already under fire within the party, is going to be able to declare a decisive victory in this race, even if it ends up titling in Tedisco's direction once all the paper ballots are counted.

The chairman made an early foray to the 20th in the wake of Tedisco's selection by the GOP county chairs to carry their banner into yesterday's special election. He also appeared at a fundraiser for Tedisco that was hosted by Manhattan GOP chairwoman, Jennifer Saul, her father, Andrew, and attended by former Gov. George Pataki.

Steele is due back in New York today for a closed-door coffee with GOP leaders and Mayor Bloomberg, who is still trying to put together sufficient support among the city's Republican county chairs to run on their ballot line for a third time this fall.



TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: everheardofkeywords; everheardoftopics; gillebrand; murphy; newyork; ny20; tedisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
I'm going to disagree with the spin that this should have been an easy win for the GOP. For all the talk about how this is a staunch GOP district the numbers say otherwise. It looks like a purple district that typically leans GOP in presidential races, but can go either way down ticket. The numbers for Spitzer were overwhelmingly pro-RAT and the district goes for Schumer and Clinton. This tells you something about how committed the registered Republicans are to party principles.

Assuming 6000 ballots to go, Tedisco would need just over 51% to prevail. I don't know whether he can pull it off or not. But it's pretty clear the press spin is designed to demoralize Republicans, not offer fair comment.

1 posted on 04/01/2009 6:25:41 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I read earlier that it was 10,000 absentee ballots and the Republicans had an edge of 1100. They are supposed to count them on Apeil 13th.


2 posted on 04/01/2009 6:31:01 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Now I am disheartened knowing that Michael “Abortion is a choice” Steele is actively and publicly supporting Tedisco.

That does not bode well to have Steele as a cheerleader, as he wants to pull in a bigger tent and Tedisco is not expanding the tent.


3 posted on 04/01/2009 6:32:10 AM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Yes, but how many of the absentee ballots were sent in by ACORN?


4 posted on 04/01/2009 6:33:56 AM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

This election was ACORNed. But it is still conservative enough that military ballots could spell the difference.

Steele is a fool.


5 posted on 04/01/2009 6:35:36 AM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
the press spin is designed to demoralize Republicans, not offer fair comment.

Well, that's news! :) VERY good points about average voting there, other than presidential campaigns. If the media says black, it must be white. That is axiomatic. V's wife.

6 posted on 04/01/2009 6:45:05 AM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Make no mistake, this was VERY winnable. I live within walking distance of the district.

The fact of the matter is that Republicans have betrayed their base and when a candidate displays wishy-washy tendencies, the base just shuts them off. I have no doubt that this is true elsewhere as well, but I can tell you for sure that is the case here.

The people that defended and fought for conservative principles believed in Republicans and were let down. People took a lot of crap for these guys and the people they fought so hard to elect left them lying in the dirt to fend for themselves. Many of them don’t know what the hell to believe now.

If a Republican candidate displays ANY sign of not being rooted in principle, the Dem will win. Tedisco shot himself in the foot when he was wishy-washy on the bailout bill, trying to play both sides. It was a bonehead move and as a career politician, he should have known better.

Plus, ACORN was a factor here, as it always is in NY.


7 posted on 04/01/2009 6:46:16 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (We are at an awkward stage: too late to fix things from within and too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Wow, do you recall where you read that?


8 posted on 04/01/2009 6:46:31 AM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

IIRC, this was a solidly Republican district for over a century and, although encompassing the home of FDR, it was represented during the New Deal era by Hamilton Fish, a staunch conservative. Has the district changed due to an influx of people from New York City and its immediate suburbs in recent decades?


9 posted on 04/01/2009 7:00:02 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
Tedisco shot himself in the foot when he was wishy-washy on the bailout bill, trying to play both sides.

This better illustrates it: Men Should Act Like Men

10 posted on 04/01/2009 7:00:44 AM PDT by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
Tedisco shot himself in the foot when he was wishy-washy on the bailout bill, trying to play both sides. It was a bonehead move and as a career politician, he should have known better.

This is getting old. Ronald Reagan pointed the way to success by campaigning on solid principles boldly and articulately presented. By contrast, Alf Landon, Tom Dewey, Bob Dole, John McCain, and Richard Nixon in his first try for the White House provide examples of how the wishy-washy, me-too approach can be a fast track to failure. Yet me-tooism prevails among the GOP's leaders.

Polemicist Samuel Francis dubbed the GOP the Stupid Party. They seem to be living up to this moniker.

11 posted on 04/01/2009 7:08:00 AM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Tedisco was up 20 points quite recently...this is bad news for the GOP...we better get working to rebuild this party or 2010 is going to be a GOP blood bath.


12 posted on 04/01/2009 7:11:58 AM PDT by nyconse (When you buy something, make an investment in your country. Buy American or bye bye America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.; perfect_rovian_storm
Has the district changed due to an influx of people from New York City and its immediate suburbs in recent decades?

I believe that is what is happening. I have family from Amsterdam who complains about all those coming from NY to get better welfare. But, they don't mind them come election time, since they are democrats.

13 posted on 04/01/2009 7:12:33 AM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
For anyone trying to portray this as a win should first shut up. This district should have been won by 5 to 10%. We need to remember that, this was not general election. We had all the time in the world to bring all our supporters to the precincts and we as party failed miserably.

When will republicans understand, don't TRY to follow the main stream media. Tedisco was in the saddle and there he did a 180 turn on the stimulus package. From then, he consistently came down and he should be thanking his lucky star to be even this close. He was a very POOR candidate. At first, I thought, he had all the experience in local politics and he will win the district by 10 to 15%. What a disappointment!!

14 posted on 04/01/2009 7:16:12 AM PDT by Ranjit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jaidyn

That is a factor, as is the proximity to Albany, which brings in government employees.

It’s not that they ‘don’t mind’ them. They count on them voting for Democrats which is the entire reason they’re so hell bent on enslaving everyone with welfare.


15 posted on 04/01/2009 7:16:56 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (We are at an awkward stage: too late to fix things from within and too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

“Richard Nixon”

in defense of Nixon’s first run for Pres there were some mysterious ballot issues in a few states thanks to Kennedy’s mob friends
keep in mind this was a very close election
Nixon also could have campaigned more in more strategic areas as opposed to making an appearance in all 50 states


16 posted on 04/01/2009 7:24:12 AM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
"Dissing" Rush Limbaugh during the days that the Dems were targeting him and piling on didn't help the GOP candidate.

This should have been very winnable but, like McCain, the candidate can only blame himself. To get this close given the lukewarm quality of the Republican candidate is nice, but not convincing. Steele said just about all he could--and it isn't over yet.

17 posted on 04/01/2009 7:28:53 AM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

Folks,

I just got an email on the number of absentee ballots. Total number is 5906

Republicans outnumber the absentee ballots by a margin of 798

798-59= 739

Looks like Tedisco might win by 500 votes. What a poor show by our party?


18 posted on 04/01/2009 7:30:14 AM PDT by Ranjit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit
What is wrong with everybody on this thread? I am getting tired of all of the Republican bashing going on. We have thrown two elections, now, hissy fits, really. I keep reading threads and commentary about how Republicans are just as bad as Democrats, they voted for the bailout, etc.

We have to stop letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. We will never get perfect politicians, especially in districts that were recently held by Democrats. It is starting to look like we won this race. It is a win by a Republican for a district formerly held by a Democrat. Let the Democrats try to spin that as a loss by the GOP because it wasn't a big enough margin. We need to proclaim loud and long that a REPUBLICAN WON A DEMOCRAT DISTRICT.

19 posted on 04/01/2009 7:57:55 AM PDT by sportutegrl (If liberals could do math, they would be conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
The democrats won this seat in 2006 and 2008 and by very large margins. Why do you think that the Republican would have an easy win here? I see last night special elections as a big improvement for the Republican in this district and a bad reflection on Obama socialist policies.
20 posted on 04/01/2009 8:02:54 AM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson