Skip to comments.
MARCH 30 FULL PAGE L.A. TIMES: With all due respect Mr. President, that is not true
LA SLIMES ^
| 3-30-09
Posted on 03/30/2009 8:40:50 PM PDT by doug from upland
NOTE: I did not buy this piece of ****. It was left at the table where I had breakfast this morning with a client. :)
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; latimes; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: ArmyTeach
So your statement would start with:
“With all due respect, which is very little...”
21
posted on
03/30/2009 8:56:37 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: amom
Many/most of the PH.D’s listed on that ad are not Americans. These scientists are from all around the globe. The rhetoric needs to be ramped up significantly on this global warming farce, this was a good step.
22
posted on
03/30/2009 8:56:49 PM PDT
by
raptor29
To: Squantos
That’s the best pocket Constitution I’ve used. Really pocket sized, so you never have to leave home without it. I’m due to order another batch. I only order ten or so at a time though.
To: mamelukesabre
Funny you should say that I am a high end Handy man in the OC
24
posted on
03/30/2009 8:59:13 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: doug from upland
OUCH! That’s gonna leave a nasty mark on his ego.
25
posted on
03/30/2009 9:00:41 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: Seven plus One
Yeah if my supply gets lower than a dozen or so I buy more as well !
Stay safe !
26
posted on
03/30/2009 9:01:31 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: al baby
27
posted on
03/30/2009 9:02:03 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: Seven plus One
The problem is that the way the courts interpret it often defies common sense. I decided many years ago, that the antifederalists hadaclearer view of theConstitution than the Federalists. On virtually every point, the courts have gone with the principle of “consolidation.”
28
posted on
03/30/2009 9:03:17 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(ECCE homo)
To: raptor29
"...The rhetoric needs to be ramped up significantly on this global warming farce, this was a good step..."Agreed completely.
Thanks too for the info on the nationalities. I can't make out the names here. Good on all of them.
29
posted on
03/30/2009 9:06:57 PM PDT
by
amom
(Proud Tanker Mom)
To: doug from upland
Few challenges facing America and the world are less urgent than combating the non-problem of global warming "Mister Obama, tear...down...that...lie!
.
30
posted on
03/30/2009 9:07:59 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Seaplaner
Voops! Wrong quote....dang!
31
posted on
03/30/2009 9:10:02 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: doug from upland
Global Warming, Is the new Lysenkoism.
32
posted on
03/30/2009 9:14:59 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c you're paranoid, doesn't mean "they" aren't out to get you.. :^)
To: doug from upland
Now that is intestinal fortitude for doing that...and I love every word of it!!!
33
posted on
03/30/2009 9:24:25 PM PDT
by
phatus maximus
( John 6:29. Learn it, love it, live it.)
To: Former MSM Viewer
“With all due respect.”
It’s certainly not apologetic. It is showing respect for their office, not them, necessarily.
As Republicans I think it is imperative that we keep this as is. There’s a reason this type of thing was added.
It is sorely needed polite discourse and good manners.
Sounds stuffy, I know. But, frankly, I wouldn’t want to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
I, for one, do respect the structure of our government and its various offices.
These things show reverence for our laws, our constitution, our freedom, etc. These should be held on high.
The people in those offices right now, by and large, can go to hades.
I was born far too late, so, for what it’s worth.
34
posted on
03/30/2009 9:48:37 PM PDT
by
Boucheau
("...if destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher." Abe)
To: amom
35
posted on
03/30/2009 9:56:13 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(10 million views of .HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
To: doug from upland
"with all due respect"
I got your respect right here
36
posted on
03/30/2009 10:08:40 PM PDT
by
Nateman
(Bohica and it's REALLY REALLY bad!)
To: RobbyS
The problem is that the way the courts interpret it often defies common sense. I decided many years ago, that the antifederalists hadaclearer view of the Constitution than the Federalists...Yep. But that's how the Bill Of Rights came about. Even if the present administration manages to stuff the S.C. with anti- constitutionalists the idea of 'to the States respectively, or to the people.' will still be written in plain text. Some state legislatures at last appear to be waking up to that tune now. The party in charge now is pretty pushy with its agenda. I see some interesting arguments in our near future.
To: skinkinthegrass
To: TheNewPundit
Expect everyone on that list to be unemployed within 6 months.I'm laughing now, but as we both know, it could happen with 'President & CEO Obama'!
39
posted on
03/30/2009 10:26:13 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: doug from upland
Obama is going to be soooooo upset with all those Ph.D’s disputing him. roflol!
40
posted on
03/30/2009 10:29:49 PM PDT
by
kcvl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson