Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia backs return to Gold Standard to solve financial crisis
Telegraph UK ^

Posted on 03/30/2009 12:58:42 PM PDT by mnehring

Russia has become the first major country to call for a partial restoration of the Gold Standard to uphold discipline in the world financial system.

Arkady Dvorkevich, the Kremlin's chief economic adviser, said Russia would favour the inclusion of gold bullion in the basket-weighting of a new world currency based on Special Drawing Rights issued by the International Monetary Fund.

Chinese and Russian leaders both plan to open debate on an SDR-based reserve currency as an alternative to the US dollar at the G20 summit in London this week, although the world may not yet be ready for such a radical proposal.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS: bahog; gold; goldstandard; kolyma; ronpaul; ronskipavelski; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: mnehring

I’m under the impression that a great deal of the world’s gold and silver is in India. It is traditional to give gifts of precious metals for Hindu weddings and the Indians tend to hang onto their gold rather than sell it.


21 posted on 03/30/2009 1:31:02 PM PDT by Argus (We've gone downtown to Clown Town, and that's where we'll be living from now on..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

No matter whom is in possession of the resource, moving to a standard where you are dependent on that resource means that you are in a position to be held economically hostage by those who hold the resource (see Oil situation).. It is one of those reasons why I have never jumped on the Gold Standard bandwagon.. It would be a good alternative IF we first make ourselves more independent in our supply of the resource.


22 posted on 03/30/2009 1:38:43 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Putin’s probably less of a communist and more free market than The Islamo-Teleprompter In Chief.

Of the two, which has actually lived under this system...Experience vs Academia...hmmm...

23 posted on 03/30/2009 1:43:52 PM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

The only thing worse than saying who when you mean whom is saying whom when you mean who. :)


24 posted on 03/30/2009 1:57:56 PM PDT by douginthearmy (Julio is Amerika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
No matter whom is in possession of the resource, moving to a standard where you are dependent on that resource means that you are in a position to be held economically hostage by those who hold the resource (see Oil situation).. It is one of those reasons why I have never jumped on the Gold Standard bandwagon.. It would be a good alternative IF we first make ourselves more independent in our supply of the resource.

I'm a fan of Ron Paul's and Peter Schiff's views but I don't they take that into consideration when pushing the gold standard. In other words, I totally agree with you.
25 posted on 03/30/2009 2:05:16 PM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Califreak
I don’t know much about this at all, but shouldn’t we have stuck with the gold standard in the first place? Didn’t it all go down hill after the gold standard was jettisoned?

Bretton Woods ended in disaster. There wasn't enough gold to redeem all the dollars at the gold window at the stated conversion rate. What matters is good monetary management. Backing money with gold, or silver, or whatever doesn't guaranty good monetary management, but it does add inefficiency, and a false sense of security.

26 posted on 03/30/2009 2:12:09 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97
They generally never address the important 'how' part in any speeches or legislation. You can't accomplish anything if you don't deal with the how's. A lot of folks try to say that countries who have fiat currency never survive, but the fact is, neither do countries who have currencies based on a single commodity, it is just too risky to put all your eggs in one basket. It is why I like Milton Freedman's monetarism approach that is somewhat down the middle, currency based on the total production, but highly regulates the Fed's actions to only increase currency at a set rate below natural inflation- but reserving some power in the event of a real outside emergency (a national security fail-safe)

This way the currency is based on production, not debt, and the currency value isn't used as a way to socially engineer the economy. It is a harder currency. I've always been under the opinion a single commodity backed currency would only work in a closed system.

27 posted on 03/30/2009 2:15:33 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl
“I believe the Chinese do, also.”

Yes and they can mine it cheaply without the EPA Handcuffs we are at a disadvantage.

28 posted on 03/30/2009 2:16:33 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Osamabama the Wright kind of Racist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Who said that there would be a hue and cry among nations to return to the gold standard?

Bert!

How much gold is in Fort Knox and who owns it?
Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:56:20 PM · 44 of 101
bert to bvw

In short order, I think there will be countries who revert to the gold standard to escape the horror and anxiety of a floating currency. there will be a return to the tried and true historical basis for wealth.


29 posted on 03/30/2009 2:18:43 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . John Galt hell !...... where is Francisco dÂ’Anconia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I’m not sold on either a domestic or international gold standard, but I do have an important quibble with your statement...

Bretton Woods ended in disaster because the US wanted to inflate. The combination of Vietnam and Great Society spending in the 1960s cost the US lots of gold. Nixon did not want to face the music, so he postponed the pain by the combination of canceling gold convertability and setting up a system where ongoing US trade deficits would allow the unbacked dollar to become the new international reserve. At that point, we were (relatively) free(er) to pursue the inflation of the 1970s.

The problem is that it is not a perpetually sustainable system. Eventual change is required, and crises tend to bring on those changes.


30 posted on 03/30/2009 2:21:13 PM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

***Russia has plenty of gold mines?? I’m just saying ...***

Russia has plenty of gold. All that Aztec and Inca gold, sent to Russia by Spain in the Spanish Civil War, disappeared when Franco took over Spain.


31 posted on 03/30/2009 2:21:22 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (14. Guns only have two enemies: rust and politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I think gold mining used to be one of the major occupations in the Gulag. As Putin moves Russia back toward totalitarianism, maybe they will have cheap labor again to run those Siberian mines.


32 posted on 03/30/2009 2:40:48 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

>Backing money with gold, or silver, or whatever doesn’t guaranty good monetary management, but it does add inefficiency, and a false sense of security.<

I don’t know how much more inefficient it might or might not be, but I have wondered about it bringing a false sense of security.

I have to agree with you on good monetary management. Without that, no standard will work.


33 posted on 03/30/2009 3:08:33 PM PDT by Califreak (111th Congress: Destroying America With Reckless Abandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
a partial restoration of the Gold Standard to uphold discipline in the world financial system.

As inflation becomes perceived as a serious problem, a growing demand for gold and silver develops as an "inflation hedge"-i.e., as a store of value. Once this demand reaches a certain level, the stage becomes set for a spontaneous remonetization of the precious metals.

34 posted on 03/30/2009 3:40:49 PM PDT by mjp (Live & let live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high taxes suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
A gold standard stablizes the price of gold. The price of everything else fluctuates based upon the gold supply. If the supply of gold goes up, the value of money goes down and you have inflation.

China and Russia combined control about 25% of the world's gold production.

35 posted on 03/30/2009 4:06:47 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Crisis - America Held Hostage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

Would this not ultimately be a good thing, even if short term, our dollar goes nutty?


36 posted on 03/30/2009 5:05:26 PM PDT by Marie2 (The capacity for self-government is a moral quality. Only a moral people can be free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

it all went downhill after the income tax


37 posted on 03/30/2009 5:06:35 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

ROFL


38 posted on 03/30/2009 5:17:43 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

LOL!

Yeah, I guess it did.


39 posted on 03/30/2009 5:24:54 PM PDT by Califreak (111th Congress: Destroying America With Reckless Abandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; djsherin; bamahead; murphE; Extremely Extreme Extremist; Captain Kirk; Gondring; ...

Ping


40 posted on 03/30/2009 5:50:40 PM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson