Skip to comments.
Women's Right to Vote, the Beginning of the End for America?
Chico Enterprise Record ^
| 3/29/09
| OneVike
Posted on 03/29/2009 5:51:07 PM PDT by OneVike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560, 561-578 next last
To: ansel12
You went back and forth for several posts, denying your source, claiming your source, denying it, etc. If you can’t learn to lie better than that, maybe you should consider giving up lying altogether. That should keep you quiet.
521
posted on
04/01/2009 1:10:44 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
“You went back and forth for several posts, denying your source, claiming your source, denying it,”
No, I didn’t, I pointed out that it should be called Jim’s source, I never denied that the source was the same one that I personally used for freerepublic numbers.
You do realize that what you are doing in almost every post is the definition of lying?
522
posted on
04/01/2009 1:16:40 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: ansel12
Last time I checked, all your posts were still up. So it doesn’t do you any good to keep lying. Anyone can see for themselves.
Your story has become boring. Please quit bothering me. If you come up with something original, like the truth for example, then maybe it will be worth my time to read what you have to say. But as long as you keep batting around the same tired lies, please don’t pester me.
523
posted on
04/01/2009 1:19:34 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
Your dishonesty is startling.
The truth is that I was right about FR not being a majority female site, why such a simple fact would set you off so much and stir up such anger and personal venom in you, I don’t understand. I don’t know why that led you to treat this as a kind of war against a fellow freeper, my posts to you just weren’t the kind of posts that should have stirred up so much emotion and personalization.
524
posted on
04/01/2009 1:28:23 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: ansel12
Calm down. Don’t get your panties a wad just because I won’t be your friend. I just don’t happen to enjoy being lied to. Some people don’t mind, so there’s still a chance for you to find a friend. In the meantime, try not to be so irrational. Quit humping my leg. Get a grip on yourself. I’m embarrassed for you.
525
posted on
04/01/2009 1:34:04 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
Like I said emotional and personal.
526
posted on
04/01/2009 1:35:34 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: ansel12
until . Now please, go find somebody else's leg.
527
posted on
04/01/2009 1:45:23 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
Pictures, cute, nothing personal and emotional there.
528
posted on
04/01/2009 3:47:24 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
To: TAdams8591
Blame yourselves.
If you reread the article you will see in the 7th paragraph I did blame men.
Unfortunately men eventually abdicated their God given responsibility and allowed their emotional partner an equal footing in deciding the country's fate.
Are you people still discussing my piece? I am flattered.
Did you know that my article was in the top 100 discussed stories on the web Monday? Then I found out that the Gannet News Organization sent a link to the story to every news source in America.
I don't know if that is good or bad, It is however, just the facts
529
posted on
04/01/2009 4:42:21 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(Just a Christian waiting to go home)
To: BykrBayb
LOL!
530
posted on
04/01/2009 4:45:32 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(God, Bless America, please.)
To: BykrBayb
Interesting, a lot of these sites also checked out my article at Post Scripts. They had to come to FR and link from here though. All places listed FR instead of PS, so what ever traffic PS got for my story outside the usual traffic came via FR.
That is a good thing.
531
posted on
04/01/2009 4:48:47 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(Just a Christian waiting to go home)
To: OneVike
Why is that a good thing?
532
posted on
04/01/2009 4:53:26 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(God, Bless America, please.)
To: fanfan; OneVike
Because he feels popular.
But, actually what those people visiting FR for this article are saying is “Look at what those neanderthals are saying”.
533
posted on
04/01/2009 4:59:39 PM PDT
by
HollyB
To: HollyB; OneVike
His sign up date 1998, but the motivations do seem suspect, don’t they......
534
posted on
04/01/2009 5:02:50 PM PDT
by
fanfan
(God, Bless America, please.)
Comment #535 Removed by Moderator
To: OneVike
Taking the vote away from women is as likely as taking the vote away from liberals. It's not going to happen. therefore, your article is an utter waste of time.
"Did you know that my article was in the top 100 discussed stories on the web Monday? Then I found out that the Gannet News Organization sent a link to the story to every news source in America."
Wasting time does seem to be one of America's favorite past times, and sometimes conservatives are no different.
My logical mind wasn't fooled by Liberalism in highschool, but as a grown man, you were.
536
posted on
04/01/2009 8:28:49 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(Bush's recession, Obama's depression.)
To: OneVike
"Unfortunately men eventually abdicated their God given responsibility and allowed their emotional partner an equal footing in deciding the country's fate." I never wrote the above, but you made it appear as if I did. I have news for you, men are every bit as emotional as women. The emotion they generally express, is anger, probably because of societal conventions. They feel the other emotions as well.
The problem with your comment is, the premise is incorrect. Male or female it is usually the smarter partner who is the most logical.
537
posted on
04/01/2009 8:35:02 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(Bush's recession, Obama's depression.)
To: OneVike
Oh and I'll repeat, it isn't that you gave the vote to women, but with the coming of the sexual revolution (which really freed men), you shirked you're responsibilities and stopped marrying and supporting the women you impregnated and some of you gave up the idea of marriage period, leaving a vaccuum for government to pick up the responsibilities too many men spurned.
Most of those abandoned women vote for democrats who help to support them. Surprise, surprise.
538
posted on
04/01/2009 8:43:06 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(Bush's recession, Obama's depression.)
To: TAdams8591
I was quoting the part in my article that I wrote so you could see that I blamed men for the whole problem. Shhheeesh!
You just made my point about being overly emotional in your thinking. A logical person would have thought, "Oh, he must be quoting where he wrote that he blamed men, because I did not say that."
Do you do that when you get ready to go into the booth to vote?
I think it is time to step back from your monitor, walk outdoors, and take a few deep breaths of fresh air to clear out your overly emotional brain.
539
posted on
04/01/2009 10:02:46 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(Just a Christian waiting to go home)
To: OneVike
I know you quoted from your article. You didn't differentiate the quotes. The illogical way you did it (you should have labeled the quotes) made it look as though I was the author of both quotes. Thus, I had to call attention to it, so the readers were not confused. A logical person would have realized that instead of jumping to emotional conclusions about my emotionalism.
You blame men for giving their emotional counterparts the right to vote, as the reason for our current debacle, that more women vote for democrats than men. I blame men, as I said now twice, but for a different reason. To have acknowledged that we both blame men in and of itself is not enough. Logic dictates you should have followed through and also have noted the varying reasons for the blame, to make the discussion thorough and to avoid leaving a false impression which you failed to do.
Frankly there isn't a point in your article that hasn't been discussed on FR since I first came here in 1998, many, many times. The points are superficially trite and lacking in depth, and it contains nothing fresh or particularly insightful.
The fact remains that without the sexual revolution, the reason for the disparity among men and women and their votes for Democrats and Republicans would be nonexistent, as would the disparity itself.
For me personally, except for the men in my family, the males in my age group with whom I have known well or been acquainted, rarely were of the same political persuasion. Most were college educated and accepted whatever the popular culture dictated when it came to just about everything, including politics. They were so illogical, our conversations when it came to anything of worth, substance or seriousness, were maddening. Every time someone posts the ridiculous comments you make about women and their lack of logic, I am reminded of them. You so understate and ignore the psychological and social dynamics of our current society, as if we're living back in the days of "Annie Get Your Gun," it is laughable.
540
posted on
04/01/2009 11:01:21 PM PDT
by
TAdams8591
(Bush's recession, Obama's depression.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560, 561-578 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson