Posted on 03/29/2009 5:51:07 PM PDT by OneVike
From the day the founding Fathers risked their liberty and life by signing the Declaration of Independence, there has been those who have wanted to sink this great ship called the United States of America. Well 143 years later the good ship America took a torpedo hit that at the time seemed like just another glancing blow. What many still consider the greatest step forward in equality for the sexes, was more then just a glancing blow however. It was in fact a deadly strike that entered the very heart of the ship and has been smoldering since. The damage caused by the 19th amendment was slow in its destruction, but after almost 100 years we can now see how complete the destruction really was.
(Excerpt) Read more at norcalblogs.com ...
You went back and forth for several posts, denying your source, claiming your source, denying it, etc. If you can’t learn to lie better than that, maybe you should consider giving up lying altogether. That should keep you quiet.
“You went back and forth for several posts, denying your source, claiming your source, denying it,”
No, I didn’t, I pointed out that it should be called Jim’s source, I never denied that the source was the same one that I personally used for freerepublic numbers.
You do realize that what you are doing in almost every post is the definition of lying?
Last time I checked, all your posts were still up. So it doesn’t do you any good to keep lying. Anyone can see for themselves.
Your story has become boring. Please quit bothering me. If you come up with something original, like the truth for example, then maybe it will be worth my time to read what you have to say. But as long as you keep batting around the same tired lies, please don’t pester me.
Your dishonesty is startling.
The truth is that I was right about FR not being a majority female site, why such a simple fact would set you off so much and stir up such anger and personal venom in you, I don’t understand. I don’t know why that led you to treat this as a kind of war against a fellow freeper, my posts to you just weren’t the kind of posts that should have stirred up so much emotion and personalization.
Calm down. Don’t get your panties a wad just because I won’t be your friend. I just don’t happen to enjoy being lied to. Some people don’t mind, so there’s still a chance for you to find a friend. In the meantime, try not to be so irrational. Quit humping my leg. Get a grip on yourself. I’m embarrassed for you.
Like I said emotional and personal.
Now please, go find somebody else's leg.
Pictures, cute, nothing personal and emotional there.
Why is that a good thing?
Because he feels popular.
But, actually what those people visiting FR for this article are saying is “Look at what those neanderthals are saying”.
His sign up date 1998, but the motivations do seem suspect, don’t they......
"Did you know that my article was in the top 100 discussed stories on the web Monday? Then I found out that the Gannet News Organization sent a link to the story to every news source in America."
Wasting time does seem to be one of America's favorite past times, and sometimes conservatives are no different.
My logical mind wasn't fooled by Liberalism in highschool, but as a grown man, you were.
I never wrote the above, but you made it appear as if I did. I have news for you, men are every bit as emotional as women. The emotion they generally express, is anger, probably because of societal conventions. They feel the other emotions as well.
The problem with your comment is, the premise is incorrect. Male or female it is usually the smarter partner who is the most logical.
Most of those abandoned women vote for democrats who help to support them. Surprise, surprise.
You blame men for giving their emotional counterparts the right to vote, as the reason for our current debacle, that more women vote for democrats than men. I blame men, as I said now twice, but for a different reason. To have acknowledged that we both blame men in and of itself is not enough. Logic dictates you should have followed through and also have noted the varying reasons for the blame, to make the discussion thorough and to avoid leaving a false impression which you failed to do.
Frankly there isn't a point in your article that hasn't been discussed on FR since I first came here in 1998, many, many times. The points are superficially trite and lacking in depth, and it contains nothing fresh or particularly insightful.
The fact remains that without the sexual revolution, the reason for the disparity among men and women and their votes for Democrats and Republicans would be nonexistent, as would the disparity itself.
For me personally, except for the men in my family, the males in my age group with whom I have known well or been acquainted, rarely were of the same political persuasion. Most were college educated and accepted whatever the popular culture dictated when it came to just about everything, including politics. They were so illogical, our conversations when it came to anything of worth, substance or seriousness, were maddening. Every time someone posts the ridiculous comments you make about women and their lack of logic, I am reminded of them. You so understate and ignore the psychological and social dynamics of our current society, as if we're living back in the days of "Annie Get Your Gun," it is laughable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.