Don't confuse phenotype with genotype.
That was no octopus. It’s Helen Thomas hiding from conservatives and the Joosz.
Ping-Pong
Got a link?
I'll accept.
It looks just like a modern-day octopus...
Accepted.
In all that time, it seems, the octopus hasn't evolved not one tiny bit.
Not accepted. Note the "it seems" escape hatch. "Not one tiny bit" is totally unsupportable.
Not proof of anything. Statements like this damage the credibility of an issue, for all they may attract more adherents to the issue.
And maybe that's the point... to attract the most adherents?
Call me unresolved on this issue -- especially as my questions have or came close to costing me FReeper friends from both sides (everything was Created vs. there never was a "Creation").
Stuff like this just muddies the waters.
Wonder if the calamari came with marinara sauce back then.
Cockroaches havent evolved much either, along with many other animals. Darwin is still a failed theory for other reasons, though.
"I am NOT an octopus"
there may be..have you searched ALL of Africa?
Rare fossil octopuses found: 95 million-year-old
msnbc | March. 18, 2009
Posted on 03/22/2009 9:35:19 AM PDT by JoeProBono
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2212066/posts
|
|||
Gods |
Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |