Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Officials Ask for Federal Ban on Assault Weapons
NBC Los Angeles ^ | Mar 27, 2009 | NBC Los Angeles

Posted on 03/27/2009 11:53:25 AM PDT by holymoly

A week after four Oakland police officers were gunned down by a parolee with a semiautomatic weapon, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and City Councilman Jack Weiss on Friday called for the federal government to reinstate a ban on assault weapons.

Before heading to the Bay Area this morning for the funerals of Oakland police Sgt. Mark Dunakin, Sgt. Ervin Romans, Sgt. Daniel Sakai and Officer John Hege, the mayor and councilman called for the renewal of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which prevented the sale of most semiautomatic weapons.

"This morning we are calling on Congress and the Obama administration to make gun control a top priority now and to reauthorize the assault weapons ban right away," Villaraigosa said. "Whether it's a police officer at a routine traffic stop or a teenager walking home from school, handguns, automatic rifles and AK-47s are a threat to the safety of every American."

It is estimated that one in five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty is killed with an assault weapon.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder indicated last month that the Obama Administration will pursue renewal of the ban.

"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to re-institute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder said in February.

The Federal Assault Weapons Ban was passed by Congress in 1994 and signed into law by President Bill Clinton. The law placed a 10-year ban on the sale of certain semiautomatic weapons, including military style semiautomatic rifles to civilians, but the ban was allowed to expire when George Bush became president.

There have been reports that people have been stocking up on guns because of rumors the Obama administration will crack down on gun ownership.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; lovellemixon; oakland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
Molon labe
1 posted on 03/27/2009 11:53:25 AM PDT by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holymoly

The same ban made no impact on gun crimes. Another one will have no difference.

Molon Labe!


2 posted on 03/27/2009 11:54:38 AM PDT by Anti-Kenyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Was the weapon in question purchased legally in the first place?


3 posted on 03/27/2009 11:55:02 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

And so the grab begins!


4 posted on 03/27/2009 11:57:46 AM PDT by NV Lawdog (In God I trust; Everybody else keep your hands where I can see them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
It is estimated that one in five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty is killed with an assault weapon.

gotta call BULLSH!T on this one...

5 posted on 03/27/2009 11:58:53 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 ("JesusChrist 08"...Trust in the Lord......=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Wassamatta, after all, YOUR STATE BANS SUCH WEAPONS.....and we know LAWS STOP CRIMINALS, riiight? Your law stopped this criminal, riiiiight?

Oh, it didn't. Well hell, we must need ANOTHER LAW!

6 posted on 03/27/2009 11:59:26 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Was the weapon in question purchased legally in the first place?

Of course not, he was a paroled FELON.

7 posted on 03/27/2009 11:59:33 AM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
It is estimated that one in five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty is killed with an assault weapon.

"Estimated" by whom?

8 posted on 03/27/2009 12:00:16 PM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Was the weapon in question purchased legally in the first place?

That I don't know. And we may never know, since the media doesn't care.

9 posted on 03/27/2009 12:01:21 PM PDT by holymoly ("Of" is not a synonym for "have".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Time to buy one:


10 posted on 03/27/2009 12:01:57 PM PDT by TonyInOhio ( What will Obama's Teleprompter tell him to do today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Bring it!


11 posted on 03/27/2009 12:02:11 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (Happiness is a choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Thats because the people who did this study consider anything more than a sling-shot, an assault weapon.


12 posted on 03/27/2009 12:02:19 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3

I 2nd your BS


13 posted on 03/27/2009 12:02:41 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

The lede says that the murder weapon was “semiautomatic,” but that casts a rather wide net. My understanding is that semiautomatic means one round per squees of the trigger, without need for any further reloading action needed(besides the re-squeezing of said trigger).

So a .38 revolver is now OMG IT’S A SEMIAUTOMATIC!!!? (Not saying that a .38 was the murder weapon here, but it too is “semiautomatic” [gasp, horror].


14 posted on 03/27/2009 12:02:45 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Incredibly blatant propaganda. We do not even know for certain what the firearms use were.

The “one in five” number is based on the theory that virtually every semi-automatic handgun is an “assault weapon”.

California already has an “Assault Weapon” ban. It did not work.

15 posted on 03/27/2009 12:02:49 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
LA's problems are not the problems of people in other states. They should mind their own damn business. I left that crappy state to escape their fascist anti-gun laws. The last thing I want is to have them inflicted on me at the federal level.
16 posted on 03/27/2009 12:03:43 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOAT
Of course not, he was a paroled FELON.

Didn't the weapon belong to a relative of Lovelle Mixons?

We know Mixon couldn't legally possess it,but that doesn't answer the question as to whether the original purchase was legal.

17 posted on 03/27/2009 12:04:11 PM PDT by holymoly ("Of" is not a synonym for "have".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost

Myth: The supply of guns is a danger to law enforcement

Fact: The courts kill cops by letting felons out of prison early. Of police murdered in the line of duty:

70% are killed by criminals with prior arrest records.

53% of these criminals have prior convictions.

22% are on probation when the officer is killed.

Myth: Assault weapons are a serious problem in the U.S.

Fact: In 1994, before the Federal “assault weapons ban”, you were eleven (11) times more likely to be beaten to death than to be killed by an “assault weapon”. In the first year since the ban was lifted, murders declined 3.6%, and violent crime 1.7%.

Fact: Nationally, “assault weapons” were used in 1.4% of crimes involving firearms and 0.25% of all violent crime before the enactment of any national or state “assault weapons” ban. In many major urban areas (San Antonio, Mobile, Nashville, etc.) and some entire states (Maryland, New Jersey, etc.) the rate is less than 0.1%.

Fact: Even weapons misclassified as “assault weapons” (common in the former Federal and California “assault weapons” confiscations) are used in less than 1% of all homicides.


18 posted on 03/27/2009 12:04:18 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

ALL weapons are “assault” weapons. That’s what they’re made for..........


19 posted on 03/27/2009 12:04:26 PM PDT by Red Badger (If Keynesian economics worked, Zimbabwe would be a superpower.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NV Lawdog

People need to remember the revolution. Our people had simular arms. This helped them to combat the British. If arms are taken away, arms that can withstand a revolution, you will be left with the squirrel guns....not much use and they know it.


20 posted on 03/27/2009 12:05:11 PM PDT by RC2 (http://www.youtube.com/user/Funbobbasso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson