so is Anthony Kennedy....it can be a crap shoot.
just so she doesnt want to join the military or some other major life decison that requires parental consent
s-a-r-c
how is some pharmacy supposed to know if a fat teenager is not 6 months preggers and this drug could kill her AND the baby
Do I hear 16, how about 15...........
ping!
Teach your children right from wrong, and be protective of your daughters because, you can probably guess this for yourself, the state isn’t going to help you. The state needs your daughter to be a dependent minded little ward.
“The message is clear — the FDA should put medical science first and leave politics at the lab door.”
Their statement is a lie.
It is not a matter of “leaving politics” at the door. They are really asking that science should trump ethics and morals.
Notice to all young, not-yet-fully-mature females - go ahead and take a massive dose of hormones every time you have unprotected sex, and do it while not under the care of a physician. In about 15 years, you can be the new bearded woman at the circus!
The lame stream media report on this included a comment that there is a push to permit this morning after pill to all women regardless of age (yes, they used the word women). So, they want to allow girls as young as ? to have access to a pill meant to kill life - I’m wondering if this is meant to push an agenda to allow girls as young as 10 or 11 to engage in sexual activity. These are really sick and depraved individuals.
Well, we all know it was a “political” decision to restrict minors’ access to this drug in the first place!
...and THIS court would NEVER let politics enter into their decision-taking process... NO... Never!
Why stop at 17? Why stop at all? Hand the things out door- to-door and just turn over the keys to America to the crazies. They’re coming to take me away, hee hee ho hee.
What an unexpected reaction [sarc].
Oh well, judges are, after all, just lawyers in black robes. This one is no different, he's just drumming up business for ambulance chasers, who will be suing the morning after pill pushers for wrongful death suits after young girls start dropping dead from complications after taking the morning after pill.
Judges don't issue rulings based on morality anymore, nor think of the other problems that will stem from the morning after pill abused as a instant birth control pill, and "I can have sex with anyone anytime" pill. It doesn't prevent STD's either, so this judges daughter will still come home with something, like aids, instead of a baby.
If I were a pharmacist, I would insist upon a release form signed by the parents of the girl, indemnifying me from any liability resulting from the unsupervised (by a physician) use of a potentially dangerous medication.
Will 17 yr old boys be given unrestricted access to 17 yr old girls next?
OK, so a 17 year old can make this kind of monumental decision without any supervisory or parental input, yet an 18 yr old war vet can’t decide on his own whether or not he is ready to handle the effects of a beer...
Congress kicks the tough decisions to unelected bureaucrats at FDA, EPA, etc and gets to wash their hands of the matter. The issue goes to the judiciary, where the despotic branch and the unelected branch decide what will be law. It is an unconstitutional situation that denies the people any input via their representatives.
No, it actually injects politics into it. It is an affront to parents and a gift to adults who are grooming these kids for hypersexuality.
The college psychologists who deal with the aftermath of teen sexuality, abortion and the modern sex game - hooking up, will tell you just how devastating all this feminism is on the feminine sex. These girls play along and have friends with benefits, hoping to land a meaningful relationship. In the end their self-esteem is shot, they feel like dirt and it takes years to stabilize them.
If we taught Drivers Ed like we teach Sex Ed our roadways would be deathtraps.
Who's been granted access to the 17-year old girls?
Cheers!