Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indiana bishop not to attend pro-life banquet featuring RNC head Steele
CNA ^ | March 24, 2009

Posted on 03/24/2009 6:03:52 AM PDT by NYer

Bishop Gerald Gettelfinger / RNC Chairman Michael Steel

Evansville, Ind., Mar 24, 2009 / 06:42 am (CNA).- Saying there can be “no equivocation” about abortion, Bishop of Evansville, Indiana Gerald Andrew Gettelfinger has decided not to attend the Vanderburgh County Right to Life (VCRL) banquet because Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, a Catholic who made conflicting comments about his abortion views, will be addressing the gathering.

Bishop Gettlelfinger charged that Steele “assiduously avoids” strong language on abortion.

The Washington Times reports that 2008 Republican vice-presidential candidate and Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is also to address the banquet attendees.

Paul Leingang, communications director for the Diocese of Evansville, told CNA that the bishop intends not to attend the dinner he would normally attend.

Evansville Catholic Charities Director Jim Collins also plans not to attend the gathering, saying he was “shocked” by Steele’s comments on abortion in an interview with GQ magazine.

The Republican leader had told GQ that he believes women “absolutely” have the right to choose abortion and that he believes abortion is “an individual choice.”

Steele later distanced himself from remarks in a statement, saying “I am pro-life, always have been, always will be” and voicing his support for the Republican Party platform and “its call for a Human Life Amendment.”

Last Thursday the VCRL board voted to honor its speaking contract with Steele, which agreement was reached last fall, according to the Washington Times.

"We have done our due diligence," VCRL Executive Director Mary Ellen Van Dyke told the Washington Times. "Michael Steele has made the board of directors more than satisfied with his response regarding the GQ article. He told us he always has been and will be pro-life and against abortion in all cases."

However, Bishop Gettelfinger wrote a letter to VCRL, saying that “the principled answer for us is that there can be no equivocation: Intentional abortion is an act of killing the unborn. There is no room for choice in this deadly matter. Mr. Steele assiduously avoids such strong language.”

On Monday CNA spoke with Evansville diocesan communications director Paul Leingang about Bishop Gettelfinger’s decision.

He said there were no new developments concerning the situation because Bishop Gettelfinger is out of town. The diocese had not received a response to the letter the bishop had sent to VCRL, but was still hoping for comment. The organization may not yet have received the bishop’s letter, Leingang explained.

Explaining to CNA why Bishop Gettelfinger will not be attending, Leingang said the bishop was “disturbed” by Steele’s comments in GQ magazine in regard to a woman’s “right to choose” and that they seemed to come from “a political stance, not a principled one.”

“The principled answer would be there can be no equivocation, there’s no room for ‘choice’,” Leingang told CNA, because of what is being chosen.

CNA asked about defenses of Steele which claimed he merely spoke with “unfortunate phrasing” in his GQ interview.

“The salient point is that this is the principled decision of Bishop Gettelfinger,” Leingang replied, reporting that the bishop spoke with Steele by phone last Friday and also read the statement that Steele had issued following the GQ interview.

“After that conversation and examination of the statement, Bishop Gettelfinger maintained his decision not to attend the banquet.”

The bishop has not previously had to take a stand by declining to attend an event.

“This is unique,” Leingang told CNA.

He added that Bishop Gettelfinger will explain his decision in an upcoming article for the diocesan newspaper The Message.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: abortion; gettelfinger; rnc; steele
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: sitetest

Well sure. But I would think he could get what he thinks about it out in a private conversation with a bishop. So I wonder what Steele said to the bishop, I wonder if he will tell us. I also wonder if the bishop told him to not receive Communion if he is so pro-abortion.

Freegards


41 posted on 03/24/2009 10:33:20 AM PDT by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed Says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NYer

He’s right to do so. I guess there is no major pro-life party left in America.


42 posted on 03/24/2009 2:14:28 PM PDT by Antoninus (So now "change" is defined as "more of the same, but worse"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
I suspect it's more something in the middle - he's trying to speak out of both sides of his mouth so as to attract pro-deathers, but still maintain that he's pro-life. Frankly, if that's the case, then there is little difference between what he's doing and someone who is ashamed of being pro-life.

You are right. Steele is a gaffe-machine. I wish he would just resign already, but I think we're stuck with him until the GOP gets clobbered again in 2010.
43 posted on 03/24/2009 2:16:27 PM PDT by Antoninus (So now "change" is defined as "more of the same, but worse"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Well said.


44 posted on 03/24/2009 2:22:17 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I must really wear you thin. Nevertheless it must be asked: when are you guys going to go after a full bore pro-abortionist like Obama (who ironically is also speaking in Indiana - at a Catholic event no less!!) like you go with blood and rage after someone you admit is probably just a fence-straddler. I’m waiting; I’m holding my breath.

First you complain Steele is pro-abortion and won’t back off then when he apologizes and clarifies (like you want) you call him a useless fence straddler. And look at Obama - hardly an eyelash batted. Aren’t you holding a double standard? Does that spell it out for you??


45 posted on 03/24/2009 2:37:55 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Yeah, well said. I’m holding my breath waiting for the condemnation of openly pro-abortion Obama appearing at a Catholic event in Indiana. I guess it’s more worthwhile to fire our ammo at “fence-straddlers” who are working largely to re-elect pro-life candidates. Wake me up when it’s over!


46 posted on 03/24/2009 2:41:40 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

“It is disappointing that he hasn’t made any comment regarding the Notre Dame scandal.”

Just disappointing? Is that all? How about freaking MISERABLE.

Nevermind the president of the United States who stands in steadfast opposition to the right to life should get a CATHOLIC platform in INDIANA. Oh, but Steele is a fence-straddler working to re-elect largely pro-life candidates.

One more question for the enlightened: If Steele is pro-abortion why is he speaking at a pro-life banquet?


47 posted on 03/24/2009 2:47:39 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

This is a weird story. The bishop talked to Steele on the phone, and still won’t attend. I wonder what was said, and if Steele or the bishop will comment further.

And the bishop whose diocese contains Notre Dame won’t be attending the graduation ceremony, just like here.

Freegards


48 posted on 03/24/2009 3:36:07 PM PDT by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed Says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Dear Norman Bates,

“Just disappointing? Is that all? How about freaking MISERABLE.”

I wouldn't go that far, but I won't criticize those who do.

“If Steele is pro-abortion why is he speaking at a pro-life banquet?”

I don't know that Mr. Steele IS pro-abortion. But if he is, he would want to speak at a pro-life banquet for the same reason that many pro-abortion politicians want to be viewed as pro-life, even while they promote abortion.

That's a trend I've noticed - pro-deathers who pretend to be pro-life. Like Sen. Casey, who claims to be a pro-life Democrat, but who has a 65% voting record with NARAL. I know politicians here in Maryland who are Catholic and are Democrat and want to be known as pro-life even as they refuse to lift a finger to protect unborn children.

I remember during the last campaign, during the primaries, folks were trying to convince me that Mr. Giuliani wasn't really pro-abortion, he was really pro-life. Even though he'd been adamantly opposed to a ban even of partial birth abortion.

Lots of politicians realize that there's hay to make in talking out of both sides of their mouths. Mr. Steele would hardly be the first.


sitetest

49 posted on 03/24/2009 5:10:23 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates
Dear Norman Bates,

“Nevertheless it must be asked: when are you guys going to go after a full bore pro-abortionist like Obama...”

Well, in that this post is addressed to me personally, I guess you're asking why I never go after the anti-Christ Obama.

LOL.

Why don't you look at my posts, and pick out the ones where I make reference by name to the new president? You'll find that in every instance, I always refer to the anti-Christ Obama as the anti-Christ Obama. Pretty much without exception.

If you ask me why I refer to the anti-Christ Obama as the anti-Christ Obama, I'll tell there are a variety of reasons, but that first and foremost, he is a baby-murderer.

“First you complain Steele is pro-abortion and won’t back off then when he apologizes and clarifies (like you want) you call him a useless fence straddler.”

Like I said, if this had happened once, I'd let it slide. But it's happened multiple times, now. He is either very inarticulate or worse. If he is merely an inarticulate pro-lifer, then he should resign because he has a politically-fatal case of foot-in-mouth disease.

“And look at Obama - hardly an eyelash batted.”

Again, why don't you look at my posts over the last couple of years, and see what I've said about the anti-Christ Obama?


sitetest

50 posted on 03/24/2009 5:17:01 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Thanks.


51 posted on 03/24/2009 5:18:05 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Dear Antoninus,

You may be right. I was hoping that Mr. Steele would go quietly early on (like, now), so that we could work through all the furor long before the 2010 elections. But it appears that that isn't to be.

The gaffes would be easier to swallow if it were being reported out of the RNC that Mr. Steele is rapidly re-building a true conservative core group, and is implementing dynamic new ideas and processes to the workings of the party machinery. Unfortunately, the reports emanating suggest that his actual work re-building the party may not be much better than his feckless efforts on TV and with print media.


sitetest

52 posted on 03/24/2009 5:23:19 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I don’t follow all your posts so I’m wrong there. But it seems way too much flak is pointed in our own direction.


53 posted on 03/24/2009 8:02:00 PM PDT by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“Evansville Catholic Charities Director Jim Collins also plans not to attend the gathering, saying he was “shocked” by Steele’s comments on abortion”Hello,Catholic Charities said they were not Catholic.


54 posted on 03/24/2009 8:09:27 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

“anti-Christ Obama” Are you saying he is the Anti Christ.Praise and Love for Our God,Thank You Lord,Fatima


55 posted on 03/24/2009 8:18:09 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fatima

THE Anti-Christ?

I don’t know.

An anti-Christ?

Certainly.


56 posted on 03/24/2009 8:30:26 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

This stuck me odd.”If you ask me why I refer to the anti-Christ Obama as the anti-Christ Obama, “Thank you for your answer.Fatima


57 posted on 03/24/2009 9:06:10 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

That is not what you said in post 45.


58 posted on 03/24/2009 9:24:44 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Dear fatima,

I didn't write post 45.

Not sure what you're asking at this point.


sitetest

59 posted on 03/25/2009 5:04:26 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson