Posted on 03/23/2009 6:15:24 PM PDT by SandRat
WASHINGTON, March 23, 2009 – The force drawdown in Iraq, even in light of increased troop strength in Afghanistan, will enable the military to build more dwell time into deployment cycles, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said today.
“I think that with reduced forces in Iraq and with force levels I see in the future for Afghanistan, we can start to build more time at home,” Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said during a Pentagon Channel podcast interview. “I think that’s absolutely vital.”
Mullen has been a staunch advocate of “home time” or “home tempo” to balance the stress imposed by demanding operational tempos. And he’s quick to clarify that being off conducting training – even if it’s at the unit’s home installation – doesn’t qualify.
“When we are home, we need to be home,” he said. “What I really mean by that is, Are you sleeping in your own bed at night? Are you spending time with your family?”
Increasing operational demands in Afghanistan make this home time critical, he said.
“We’ve got a very seasoned force right now. We’ve got a force that can do an awful lot of things,” he said. “And as we refocus toward Afghanistan and these deployments, time at home really needs to be time at home.”
Mullen called Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates’ decision to phase out the Army’s “stop-loss” policy, which keeps some soldiers in uniform beyond the terms of their enlistment contracts, another positive development.
The chairman said he rarely goes to a town hall session, in the combat theater or at home stations, without having troops ask about the unpopular policy. “I think it is time for it to go,” he said.
As the Army phases out the stop-loss program, some soldiers in critical specialties still are likely to be affected, Mullen conceded. “But we think those numbers will be very, very small,” he said. “So I am very encouraged by the change and by [Gates’] decision, and I think it will have a very positive impact on the Army.”
Mullen said his visit last month to Fort Campbell, Ky. -- which has experienced eight soldier suicides since Jan. 1 -- drove home the personal toll the overstressed force is enduring. Although the Army has the most serious problem, every other service has experienced rising suicide rates, too, he noted.
“I think that is reflective of the pressure we are under,” he said.
Mullen conceded there’s “no easy solution,” but said the best solution boils down to an engaged leadership and a force educated about risk factors and willing to step in to help a comrade in need.
“To fix a problem, you have to admit you have a problem,” Mullen said. “We’ve done that. We’ve got leadership very heavily focused on this.”
While addressing near-term issues, “we also have to stay focused on this over the long term,” he said. “Leaders have to take this one on and stay with it and support their people in this area – just as we do across the board.”
“I think that with reduced forces in Iraq and with force levels I see in the future for Afghanistan, we can start to build more time at home,” Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said during a Pentagon Channel podcast interview. “I think that’s absolutely vital.”
Please bring them home. I don’t care anymore if the ‘Rats get the credit. Before you all sand-blast me, my reasoning is this:
Something BIG is coming our way. We need a soldier who LOVES America in every foxhole in every front yard across the land. WEll, at least I want one covering my back, LOL!
What is that BIG thing coming our way?
a. Civil unrest when our economy finally winds its way down to the bottom...and the welfare checks stop coming, or...
b. Another 9/11 involving nukes at a Major Metro Area near you. And me.
I’m planning for the worst while praying for the best case scenario. ;)
My concern is that in a year from now Iraq will be a problem yet again. The terrorists are now acting up in Iraq more then they have done for over a year but the media is not reporting it. Once we leave Iraq in big numbers come August 2010 then I anticipate a horrible disaster there. Losing Iraq is a huge disaster that will cause nightmares that are beyond imagination. We should not leave Iraq before 2015.
I meant the terrorists do not have the capacity to do a terrorist attack using a nuclear weapon.
Since the US has said it is leaving Iraq, it is a waste of lives and soldier time for the US to stay there. Essentially, it has said that it doesn’t care if it succeeds or not. It is immoral and unethical to consume soldier lives and time on a mission that the nation no longer upholds as necessary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.