Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two U.S. Navy Ships Collide in Strait of Hormuz, Injuring 15
FoxNews ^

Posted on 03/20/2009 6:48:01 AM PDT by Scythian

MANAMA, Bahrain — The U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet says two of its vessels — a submarine and an amphibious ship — collided in the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and the Arabian peninsula early Friday.

The military says in a statement that the collision occurred around 1:00 a.m. local time on Friday (5 p.m. EDT, Thursday).

The USS Hartford, a submarine, collided with an amphibious ship, the USS New Orleans.

According to the Bahrain-based 5th Fleet, 15 soldiers aboard the Hartford were slightly injured but able to return to duty. No injuries were reported aboard the New Orleans.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hormuz; submarine; tm; usnavy; usshartford; ussneworleans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: AFreeBird

As I teach my children on our boat.

1. Nothing happens fast on a boat. (If it does it’s an emergency)

2. Never hit another boat.

The sub may move faster but the surface target can call tonnage!


41 posted on 03/20/2009 7:04:24 AM PDT by edcoil (Are we there yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

662 was 292 feet like most of the rest. I did an ICEX with her when I was on 669.


42 posted on 03/20/2009 7:05:10 AM PDT by Doohickey (The more cynical you become, the better off you'll be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

You’re kidding, right? I did tours on both 637’s and 688’s. 688’s are about 70 feet longer and draft at least another 4-5 feet. I won’t get into how my first boat hit the pier in Bangor.


43 posted on 03/20/2009 7:05:29 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

About the same time the news media gave up facts for feelings.


44 posted on 03/20/2009 7:06:18 AM PDT by FourPeas (I am the pink flamingo on the great lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Well, to be honest I wouldn’t want some country covering our sea shores with 25,000 gallons of diesal fuel either, but they will surely play this up for propaganda that we are untrained and so on ...


45 posted on 03/20/2009 7:06:26 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

I don’t know much about our Navy, but I thought our subs operated in 100% blackout. How would the boat commander know the sub was there?


46 posted on 03/20/2009 7:07:02 AM PDT by TheZMan (Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Wasn’t Carter a sub commander? Things that make you go HMMMMMMMM.....


47 posted on 03/20/2009 7:07:59 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
one was a sub and the other an amphibius ship, I could see how this could easilly happen

No you can't. As a former submarine deck officer, I assure you that submariners stay the H away from surface ships. They know they are smarter than everyone else and don't trust surface sailors [skimmer] to be smart enough to avoid a collision. And if you are steaming in formation, which subs really hate, you keep a really closer eye on them than you would on a known sex offender near your daughter. Subs are extremely maneuverable with big engines and huge rudders, so staying out of the way is really easy, actually. Must have been some idiot on the con. Plus in narrow straights, the CO and navigator would have been there to help out, so three idiots are now flying desks.

Don't know and don't care about the amphib ship. I am only concerned with the dishonor to the silent service.

48 posted on 03/20/2009 7:08:01 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
Ok, which Obamaloon cabinet member was being allowed to steer one of the vessels?

One of his daughters, maybe?

49 posted on 03/20/2009 7:08:15 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

No, he was not.


50 posted on 03/20/2009 7:09:02 AM PDT by Doohickey (The more cynical you become, the better off you'll be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

When I wrote that I thought it was a tiny very vast moving ship, I’ve since learned otherwise ... my bad


51 posted on 03/20/2009 7:09:10 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

I wonder if they were in transit or doing something else.


52 posted on 03/20/2009 7:10:10 AM PDT by PogySailor (We're so screwed.....welcome to the American Oligarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

It is a propaganda goldmine for Iran to have this happen in their back yard.

Oh well, let them start believing we are inept. As the CIA use to say, “We love when our failures are publicized”.


53 posted on 03/20/2009 7:10:14 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
If the sub was on the surface then he was not the more maneuverable vessel

Yes he was. By far, hands down, no questions about it. He was also supposed to be smarter than that. Even if the CO of the amphib ship tried to ram the sub deliberately he should not have been able to do so.

54 posted on 03/20/2009 7:11:29 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Nah, don’t pick on the girls. They didn’t ask for a dolt for a father.


55 posted on 03/20/2009 7:11:29 AM PDT by FourPeas (I am the pink flamingo on the great lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

A sub is not a ship. It’s a boat.


56 posted on 03/20/2009 7:11:56 AM PDT by RedCell (Honor thy Father (9/6/07) - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

OK...so he wasn’t a Commander...but he did serve on subs....

Carter served on surface ships and on diesel-electric submarines in the Atlantic and Pacific fleets. As a junior officer, he completed qualification for command of a diesel-electric submarine. He applied for the U.S. Navy’s fledgling nuclear submarine program run by then Captain Hyman G. Rickover. Rickover’s demands on his men and machines were legendary, and Carter later said that, next to his parents, Rickover had the greatest influence on him.

Carter has said that he loved the Navy, and had planned to make it his career. His ultimate goal was to become Chief of Naval Operations. Carter felt the best route for promotion was with submarine duty since he felt that nuclear power would be increasingly used in submarines. During service on the diesel-electric submarine USS Pomfret, Carter was almost washed overboard.[6] After six years of military service, Carter trained for the position of engineering officer in submarine USS Seawolf, then under construction.[7] Carter completed a non-credit introductory course in nuclear reactor power at Union College starting in March 1953. This followed Carter’s first-hand experience as part of a group of American and Canadian servicemen who took part in cleaning up after a nuclear meltdown at Canada’s Chalk River Laboratories reactor.[8][9]


57 posted on 03/20/2009 7:14:04 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

When they want to do something sneaky.


58 posted on 03/20/2009 7:15:09 AM PDT by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: al baby

...and submariners like to go down on them...


59 posted on 03/20/2009 7:16:07 AM PDT by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
The news just reported about 25K gallons of fuel was spilled, so expect Iran to scream about the US causing an oil slick on their shores.

Another trillion dollar spending spree for oil clean up and Planned Parenthood? (Yeah. I know. Planned Parenthood has nothing to do with it, but they will be included in the spending spree anyway. They always are.).

60 posted on 03/20/2009 7:16:15 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson