Posted on 03/19/2009 1:12:27 PM PDT by Bokababe
Sarajevo, 19 March (AKI) – Croat groups in Bosnia have denounced what they call the 'Islamisation' of the Muslim-Croat federation and have prepared a document demanding their own entity, local media reported on Thursday.
“Bosniacs (Muslims) are the main political problem in Bosnia-Herzegovina, because they openly strive for hegemony, counting on their majority, " Croat activist Leo Plockinic told journalists.
Plockinic said Croats had the worst deal of all of Bosnia's three main groups and were being subjected to assimilation by majority Muslims.
He is president of the 'Alternative Government' Croat association and the non-governmental organisation Croatia Libertas.
“One of the biggest problems in Bosnia is the unity of Bosniac politics and Islam which is turning Bosnia into a Sharia state,” Plockinic said.
“In Bosnia-Herzegovina and Sarajevo, Islamisation is being implemented at full speed," he added, claiming this damaged Croats and Serbs as well as the country's European integration bid.....
(Excerpt) Read more at adnkronos.com ...
I, for one, support the concept of an independent Croat republic succeeding from Bosnia.
Clinton, the UN and Democrats created this Islamification of the balkans.
A good plan—isolate the muzzies as much as possible.
Since Tudjman's death in 1999, I don't know if there is anyone in Croatia who favors absorbing the Croat-populated portions of Bosnia, and those districts may not be economically viable as an independent entity.
isolate and extinguish
The Serbs are not innocent parties in anything, and the standard FR argument that just because the Serbs are the same religion as most, DOES NOT mean they are friends of ours, as they have been allied with the Russians for many many years.
We should have supported the Croats from the beginning.
Screw the Serbs, and screw the Bosnians.
If it wasn’t Lent I’d tell you what you could do to yourself.
Correct, but neither was anyone else there.
Just because the Serbs are the same religion as most, DOES NOT mean they are friends of ours, as they have been allied with the Russians for many many years.
Interesting that you say that given that Churchill & FDR decided with Stalin to share Yugoslavia as a neutral -- not behind the iron curtain but still communist, run by a half-Croat/Half Slovene dictator.
Russian soldiers were not allowed to set foot in Yugoslavia after 1948 and had to offload at sea, to even get distressed ship fixed. Tito hated Stalin because he was just like him -- narcissistic and ambitious, although only slightly less bloody and brutal.
Serbs "not friends of ours"? Tell that to the 500 US airmen rescued by Serbs during WWII.
And "communist Yugoslavia as our enemy" on that I agree. But our US State Department sang Tito's praises for 50 years, until his death, and steamrolled anyone who didn't support him. Then they turned on a dime and acted like the state of Yugoslavia was the Big Bad Wolf.
"We should have supported the Croats from the beginning."
Ding, ding, ding! We DID support the Croats from the beginning! How do you think that Croatia won her independence? And how do you think they pulled off Operation Storm, except with US help? And most importantly, how do you think that the Bosnian Muslims got armed by Iran while the arms embargo was going on, except by Clinton & Congress turning a blind eye while Croatia received those arms in Croatian ports and GAVE them to the Bosnian Muslims?
"Screw the Serbs, and screw the Bosnians."
I was going to say that I agreed with FormerLib, that the Croats should get their own entity, but you know it's guys like you who just confirm in my mind that you Croats deserve whatever problems you've made for yourselves.
There was evil and good on all sides. However, the Serbs were the only ones fighting the islamization of the balkans and WE backed the other side...
Well, let me remind you that the catalyst for the first wave of the war was the constitution introduced by Tudjman , which stripped the Serbs in Croatia of many of their rights, refusing, amongst other things, to accept the right of the Serbian minority within Croatia - a majority in the Krajina - to self determination.
Did you read the interview with Tudjman's former Minister of Police, Croat Josip Boljkovac, last month? It's translated into English on de-construct.net:
Everywhere we turn we see the same problem. Yet even some conservatives get angry when people suggest ending Muslim immigration. It will be us or them.
How do you positively ID a person’s religion?
I recall many years ago when Rabbi Kahana was on 60 Minutes and he said something very interesting about Israel that ultimately is applicable many places.
Rabbi Kahana said, "Israel must decide whether it is to remain a Jewish nation or a democratic nation, because it cannot continue to be both Jewish AND democratic. The Arab (primarily Muslim) birthrate far exceeds the Jewish birthrate, so if things continue as they have, Jews will be outnumbered in Israel in the not too distant future and Israel will cease to be a Jewish state."He went on to say that they could shoot the messenger, but the message wouldn't change -- Israel had to choose, one or the other, because both could not continue.
What Kahana said about Israel is applicable to virtually every country in the world, including ours. It's the same choice as Israel's -- we are importing immigrants with birthrates that far exceed our own and cultures (like Islamic ones) whose values are nothing like our own. Our country cannot perpetuate this kind of immigration in these numbers and continue to be anything like the America we know. It's just not possible.
I am not sure what you are asking, Tequila.
In Bosnia, there are what are now called "Bosniaks" (Muslims), Croats (Roman Catholic), and Serbs (Serbian Orthodox). Religion determines ethnicity in this part of the world.
And yet people from all three groups are indigenous to Bosnia. The Roman Catholic and Orthodox ones were baptized into their Faiths, on the ground where they stood in Bosnia. They aren't "invaders from Serbia -- or Croatia".
And when the Muslim Turks invaded and treated Christians as dhimmi, some of the Christians (and members of a sect called Bogomils) gave in and converted to Islam. That's how Islam came to the (previously Christian) Balkans.
That is what some people do not understand. People who do not have interests anywhere near ours are using our freedoms against us. So I would rather end their freedom of coming here than them ending the freedoms of our future generations under Islam.
Precisely!
But this Islamic immigration issue could not have happened without Islamic allies in our own government and in the West in general. Just who these allies are is a whole other subject, because I am sure that all of this did not happen by accident.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.